DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Jack Smith testifies to Congress
#51
(01-23-2026, 06:15 PM)ANNEE Wrote: I dismiss anything that comes from the Right Wing in regard to Trump.

There is no credibility without objectivity.

They have zero objectivity with anything that has to do with Trump.

Find a Centrist site that shows 2 sides -- pro and con.

By your words, or your AI's, you know little about Jack Smith AND you dismiss all these views out-of-hand due to something something Trump. And o yeah, send me a website I can dismiss out-of-hand too.
#52
(01-23-2026, 04:56 PM)ANNEE Wrote: Says some Right Wing opinion.

The Right has no credibility when it comes to Trump.

Let me know when you find a Centrist site that shows 2 sides.  Pros and Cons.


ANNEE, there is the facts and there is propaganda.

Introducing bias into a debate, ANY debate only obfuscates from the premise.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
#53
(01-23-2026, 07:27 PM)fwki Wrote: By your words, or your AI's, you know little about Jack Smith AND you dismiss all these views out-of-hand due to something something Trump. And o yeah, send me a website I can dismiss out-of-hand too.

Does no one actually pay attention -- you know -- read exactly what someone posts?

Or do you just interpret it to say/mean what you want it to say/mean?

Right leaning Trump supporters have no objectivity.  Not about Trump.  About his devotees.

Therefore -- linking (if link provided) to a Conservative Right-Wing site (such as AFPI) also has no objective credibility.

----------------------------------------------------------------

I've stated more than once - I don't know Jack Smith.  I am watching the trial and following along -- reading comments and reviews as it continues.
#54
(01-23-2026, 07:32 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: ANNEE, there is the facts and there is propaganda.

Introducing bias into a debate, ANY debate only obfuscates from the premise.

NO -- there is what you have deemed "facts" and propaganda.

Then there is authentic facts -- and propaganda from all sides and flavors.
#55
(01-23-2026, 07:50 PM)ANNEE Wrote: NO -- there is what you have deemed "facts" and propaganda.

Then there is authentic facts -- and propaganda from all sides and flavors.


No.  Facts are facts, they are objective.

Anything else is subjective.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
#56
(01-23-2026, 07:40 PM)ANNEE Wrote: Does no one actually pay attention -- you know -- read exactly what someone posts?

Or do you just interpret it to say/mean what you want it to say/mean?

Right leaning Trump supporters have no objectivity.  Not about Trump.  About his devotees.

Therefore -- linking (if link provided) to a Conservative Right-Wing site (such as AFPI) also has no objective credibility.

----------------------------------------------------------------

I've stated more than once - I don't know Jack Smith.  I am watching the trial and following along -- reading comments and reviews as it continues.

I can play that game, left wing Trump haters have no objectivity not about Trump and  his supporters.  Therefore anything they post is regurgitated garbage embedded with presumptuous lies. Now isn't that fun, who needs facts when you can label your way through any discussion.
#57
(01-23-2026, 09:21 PM)fwki Wrote: I can play that game, left wing Trump haters have no objectivity not about Trump and  his supporters.  Therefore anything they post is regurgitated garbage embedded with presumptuous lies. Now isn't that fun, who needs facts when you can label your way through any discussion.


At least I was calm and polite.

You seem to be angry and very agitated.

Not surprising.
#58
(01-23-2026, 09:40 PM)ANNEE Wrote: At least I was calm and polite.

You seem to be angry and very agitated.

Not surprising.

Hey ANNEE, who's winning. Jack? Is that why the pushback gives those vibes?
"The only journey is the one within."
#59
(01-23-2026, 07:56 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: No.  Facts are facts, they are objective.

Anything else is subjective.

Should be.
#60
(01-23-2026, 09:40 PM)ANNEE Wrote: At least I was calm and polite.

You seem to be angry and very agitated.

Not surprising.


Pffff garbage!! He was not angry or agitated. Can't you just admit when you are wrong and move on? I guarantee you, you will be wrong again in the near future and by pretending you are not, even though everyone else is pointing out the flaws in your arguments, you are doing worse for yourself. 
Take the hit, admit you are a moron, move one with the hope you will be less of a moron in future and learn from your mistakes. That's how you fix that thing you have. You are welcome  Thumbup