Israel Ministers sanctioned by UK, AU, CA, NZ

[andy06shake]

Really.  Because I can across a BBC article from oct 2023 that claimed they would continue the investigation.  What happened there
 
Your sources remind me of 9/11 truthers.  When there was clear evidence there wan no explosives, then they shifted to thermite.  Because you with confirmation bias can in your mind make an oversized square peg fit in a round hole doesn’t mean “evidence”.

from wiki 

Quite the spectrum of opinions based on obvious lack of evidence.  But your source magically produced “evidence”.  Maybe you need to edit the wiki and see how long it lasts?  The page is protected from vandalism.  I’m guessing your source isn’t as solid as you think, and is more speculation than fact.

[email protected] sound more like a vandal than me, mate.
A wee swig of your own medicine might be in order, methinks.
Take your own advice. I’m sure you could edit a page or three and show us all on the doll where the bad Palestinian touched you.

[WallFlowerActive]

If you actually choose to read them, 

I would like to have a dime for every time a flat earther or a 9/11 truther posted the exact same thing.

I followed the event in 2023.  It basically came down to being no signature of an airstrike.  Media tried to pin the attack on an Israeli platform, they came up short on actual evidence and weapons system.  No correlating radar data to back up empty accusations.  With little evidence or no evidence.

[andy06shake]

I would like to have a dime for every time a flat earther or a 9/11 truther posted the exact same thing.

I followed the event in 2023.  It basically came down to being no signature of an airstrike.  Media tried to pin the attack on an Israeli platform, they came up short on actual evidence and weapons system.  No correlating radar data to back up empty accusations.  With little evidence or no evidence.

 That's just code for you didn't bother your arse.

"The media tried to pin the attack" — what a load of crap. There is direct evidence and witness accounts from multiple different sources, which you would notice if you had bothered to read them.

So what's the point?

It's clear how you see those people, and you refuse to answer the questions, and silence speaks volumes.

[WallFlowerActive]

 That's just code for you didn't bother your arse.

How many experts with how many guesses on why AI-171 crashed?  And how many have been proven right?

Expert in this day and age seems anyone pandering to an audience?  

It's clear how you see those people, and you refuse to answer the questions, and silence speaks volumes.

like what?

While you ignore there is little evidence the Oct 2023 convey was attacked by an air strike?

What’s the radar data?

What Israeli assets were in range with what weapons platforms?

How many weapons deployed / explosions, does it match the load capability of the Israeli platforms in range?  

if it was antipersonnel rockets / missiles, the explosion would be more like an air burst down with  large area of shrapnel.  There would not be much of a crater, damage should be down to ground.

You seem to think an antitank weapon was used.  The weapon still would come down into the target and explode.

To me, no signature of an airstrike means at least two different things.  No aircraft verified to be in range.  The damage was more ground up, not above downward.

[SurferSoul]

 

Do you also think any Palestinian over the age of 8 should be treated as an enemy combatant by Israel? 
When do you think the objective will be achieved by Israel? When is enough, enough?

[andy06shake]

Do you also think any Palestinian over the age of 8 should be treated as an enemy combatant by Israel? 
When do you think the objective will be achieved by Israel? When is enough, enough?

What he thinks is pretty clear, he just can't say it.

And that screams louder than any answer.

[andy06shake]

How many experts with how many guesses on why AI-171 crashed?  And how many have been proven right?

Expert in this day and age seems anyone pandering to an audience?  

like what?

While you ignore there is little evidence the Oct 2023 convey was attacked by an air strike?

What’s the radar data?

What Israeli assets were in range with what weapons platforms?

How many weapons deployed / explosions, does it match the load capability of the Israeli platforms in range?  

if it was antipersonnel rockets / missiles, the explosion would be more like an air burst down with  large area of shrapnel.  There would not be much of a crater, damage should be down to ground.

You seem to think an antitank weapon was used.  The weapon still would come down into the target and explode.

To me, no signature of an airstrike means at least two different things.  No aircraft verified to be in range.  The damage was more ground up, not above downward.

You're misunderstanding how modern air-to-surface munitions work, on purpose, i may add.

Not all Israeli strikes involve jets dropping bombs from altitude.

Many are drone-fired or precision-guided missiles with low radar signatures and no need for nearby aircraft.

Israel extensively uses Hermes 450 and 900 drones, both capable of launching Spike missiles, which can strike from distance with pinpoint accuracy.

And the "no crater" argument ignores the nature of these munitions.

They’re often designed to kill people, not demolish infrastructure or target vehicles alone. 

Which means less blast, and more shrapnel.

But the exact type of munition used in that strike hasn’t been officially confirmed.

Videos and forensic analysis from the Salah al-Din Road strike show bodies torn apart, not crushed by ground-level IEDs or tank shells.

The civilians were killed while following Israeli orders to evacuate.

That’s the core issue, not whether the strike came from above or sideways.

You’re not looking for truth, you’re evading it.

[WallFlowerActive]

You're misunderstanding how modern air-to-surface munitions work, on purpose, i may add.

I’m being honest.

Do you understand the difference between a rocket that is an antitank round, a mortar, and a airstrike.

[WallFlowerActive]

https://thepublicsource.org/israeli-resp...din-street
h

One of your sources.

Salah al-Din Street: Israeli Airstrikes on Convoy of Displaced People

Also from your source.

Probable AmmunitionThe video published by journalist Al-Zanoon on his Instagram account, taken a day after the incident, shows burned cars. At 0:09”, ammunition remnants can be seen on the ground, relatively similar to the rear propellers of mortar shells. They are small in size and may belong to 81 mm or 82 mm mortar shells.

https://thepublicsource.org/israeli-resp...din-street

A Mortar is not an “air strike”.  

A mortar is not a Spike antitank missile.

A mortar is a ground based weapon.  A rage of 6,000 meters. 

The mortar fragment in the report looks like the tail piece of an Iranian 81 or 82 mm mortar shell.
 
Iran provides or sells mortars and shells to Hamas.

[putnam6]

Every thread sooner or later needs some