Is Telepathy real?

[andy06shake]

I have not heard of the Camperkiller commentaries, nor do I have much interest in how a killer's mind works especially camper killers. Just lock 'em up forever.

Well, that's handy because that's not what it is at all.

Back in the day, "MrSiff" was a member at ATS, even before my time, or so im led to believe.

Camperkiller commentaries were some of his videos.

And raised some rather interesting questions. 

It's not about camping/killing unless it was on "Call of Duty".

I mean, click the link and see what you think.  

[andy06shake]

Just 
Oh crap when did you become a moderator? The world has indeed gone to hell.

btw it’s telomeres you might want to look up and evidence has been brought to the thread such as the telepathy tapes, but you refuse to look/listen.

Are they not the protective caps at the ends of our chromosomes?
 
Biologically, how do telomeres enable telepathy?
 
Do they not influence cellular aging in neurons?
 
Podcasts are not proof, SurferSoul, and by the looks of it, certainly not that one.
 

The ‘Experts’If you do a Google search for “The Telepathy Tapes” you will find that Google classifies it as a “science podcast.” Nothing could be further from the truth. It is, in fact, an explicitly anti-science podcast. The most skeptical testimonial comes from the cinematographer on the show who is described as a “huge skeptic” and a “materialist,” but by the end of episode 1, like Mickey Dolenz, he was a believer. After witnessing a psychic popsicle stick–sorting demonstration that I will describe below, he is totally on board. So much for skepticism.
The “scientists” and “experts” on the show are all people with long histories of paranormal belief.

The primary expert of the podcast, who appears in several of the episodes, is Diane Hennacy Powell, a psychiatrist and author of the 2008 book The ESP Enigma: The Scientific Case for Psychic Phenomena. The biography on her website describes her as “author, public speaker, researcher and practicing psychiatrist” but does not include a curriculum vitae or list of publications. The biography frequently describes her as a researcher, but a Google Scholar search did not turn up any published empirical studies by or coauthored by her. In addition to the book, she appears to have written three chapters in edited books and a number of book reviews in the Journal of Parapsychology and other places. Her biography also indicates that she “served as the Director of Research for the John E. Mack Institute (JEMI) after John, a former colleague at Harvard, passed in 2004.” Many readers will recall that Harvard professor of psychiatry John Mack wrote the 1994 book Abduction: Human Encounters with Aliens and was a famous believer in alien abduction.

Jeff Tarrant is a psychologist who occasionally joins the podcast to record quantitative electroencephalograms (qEEG) tests on purportedly psychic people. Although the EEG machine adds an air of science to the proceedings, nothing definitive can be learned about telepathy from looking at EEGs. Almost any pattern of brain waves can be rationalized to fit a preexisting belief, and the evidence suggests that Tarrant has such a preexisting belief. He is the author of the 2023 book Becoming Psychic: Lessons from the Minds of Mediums, Healers, and Psychics—which Diane Hennacy Powell reviewed in the Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition—and he is founder and director of the Neuromeditative Institute in Eugene, Oregon, which among other services offers psychedelic integration therapy, ketamine assisted therapy, and vibroaccoustic therapy.

Finally, Rupert Sheldrake, who holds a PhD in biochemistry from Cambridge University, is brought in to add some weight and to attack science. According to his curriculum vitae, Sheldrake worked in biology early in his career, but for several decades now he has been a proponent of psychic phenomena. He wrote the 1999 book Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home, And Other Unexplained Powers of Animals, and the 2003 book, The Sense of Being Stared At, And Other Aspects of the Extended Mind. In 2016, he published a dialogue with Michael Shermer of Skeptic magazine, Arguing Science: A Dialogue on the Future of Science and Spirit, and, more recently, he participated in a public debate with Shermer on the subject of the “Edges of Knowledge.”[sup]1[/sup] In The Telepathy Tapes, he is not shy about his view of science: “Most scientists have been brought up on materialism … The influence of this materialist dogmatism is very strong, and what they try to do is say that any educated person would agree with them. Anyone who doesn’t agree with them is stupid, uneducated, ignorant, superstitious” (episode 5).

https://bingeworthy.substack.com/p/what-...-telepathy
https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/...doscience/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Telepathy_Tapes

[imitator]

I think Telepathy is real... I believe it simply works at a quantum level.

Oh look...  Musk failed to trademark: 'Telepathy' and 'Telekinesis'
 

Elon Musk’s neural implant startup Neuralink has been trying to trademark two product names: Telepathy and Telekinesis. Musk has previously claimed that his company will be able to give people “superpowers,” so the desire to take ownership over these special abilities makes sense. Unfortunately for Neuralink, patent applications for Telepathy and Telekinesis have already been filed by a different business.

However, it turned out that another company... Prophetic... had already secured those names.

Founded by computer scientist Wesley Berry,
Prophetic's mission is to "pioneer a radical transformation of the human experience."

WTF lol... I don't think anyone should be able to trademark common words like telepathy or telekinesis. 

[Sirius]

Dr. Julia Mosbridge and uh Professor
7:20
Diane Hennessy Pal have demonstrated you
7:23
will soon see in due course in a
7:25
peer-reviewed journal hopefully papers
7:28
basically demonstrating that they have
7:30
been able to confirm telepathy that
7:34
telepathy is real. This is mindblowing
7:38
and I I think a lot of people have
7:39
actually missed the implications of our
7:41
interview with Kai Dickens and Dr. Julia
7:45
Mosbridge. The implications are immense.
7:49
It suggests that these nonverbal
7:52
autistic children are doing something
7:55
that has long been speculate about
7:57
speculated about but never proven. And
8:00
if you believe what Dr. Julia Mossbridge
8:03
told us along with Kai Dickens in the
8:05
interview that you can find on our
8:06
reality check archive. You will see that
8:09
they are saying that very soon Kai will
8:12
be broadcasting on her forthcoming
8:14
documentary sometime in 2026 

[Sirius]

One white crow and western civilization crumbles

[Sirius]

That's kind of because just like with all prophecy, it's rather vague and inconsistent at best.

Suffice to say, Atlantis did not rise once again from the sea, and that is true today as it was in the 1960s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Cayce

Telepathy claims mind-to-mind communication.

And a thought is an internal process in the brain.

That can't be transferred directly between people without language or other sensory input. 

As far as i can establish, that's not the same thing, and telepathy remains unproven.

People wish telepathy to be true because it would represent the ultimate shortcut to human connection and empathy.

But that's not how people understand things or form deep connections in the first place.

.


.


.


.
check this thread, just fun speculation https://denyignorance.com/Thread-Magnetoreception

[SurferSoul]

Are they not the protective caps at the ends of our chromosomes?
 
Biologically, how do telomeres enable telepathy?
 
Do they not influence cellular aging in neurons?
 
Podcasts are not proof, SurferSoul, and by the looks of it, certainly not that one.
 

https://bingeworthy.substack.com/p/what-...-telepathy
https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/...doscience/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Telepathy_Tapes

Ahh I should have checked that before posting, I was thinking if microtubules, telomeres are something else I found interesting and something else entirely. Microtubules are thought to be the key to qauntum tunnelling in the brain and could be the mechanism that enables consciousness. 

Speaking of consciousness is this not still a mystery to science? According to science or rather certain scientists there is no mechanism to explain it, therefore it doesn’t exist. I believe Neil Degrass Tyson said as much. It’s known as the hard problem of consciousness. Now just because science can’t really explain it, does that mean it’s not real? I’ve asked you before in this thread do you believe consciousness isn’t real? 

As for the review you posted of the Telepathy tapes, I’ll address that in another post, but who does he think he is having digs at Rupert and Jack? There’s healthy scepticism and then there’s wanton denial.

[andy06shake]

Ahh I should have checked that before posting, I was thinking if microtubules, telomeres are something else I found interesting and something else entirely. Microtubules are thought to be the key to qauntum tunnelling in the brain and could be the mechanism that enables consciousness. 

Speaking of consciousness is this not still a mystery to science? According to science or rather certain scientists there is no mechanism to explain it, therefore it doesn’t exist. I believe Neil Degrass Tyson said as much. It’s known as the hard problem of consciousness. Now just because science can’t really explain it, does that mean it’s not real? I’ve asked you before in this thread do you believe consciousness isn’t real? 

As for the review you posted of the Telepathy tapes, I’ll address that in another post, but who does he think he is having digs at Rupert and Jack? There’s healthy scepticism and then there’s wanton denial.

That's ok.

As far as i know, consciousness is the ultimate mystery.

As to reality, being real, i don't know, it feels real for all intents and purposes. 




Mr Siff did a half-decent short video on that topic also, if memory serves.

[imitator]

.
[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43vuOpJY46s]
.
check this thread, just fun speculation https://denyignorance.com/Thread-Magnetoreception

Penrose practically aligns with Bohm's... the idea that mind arises from a deeper quantum order is shared.

Here is Dr Paavo Pylkkänen on Physics and Consciousness
I like the Wi-Fi analogy in this vid... 




That mind and consciousness aren’t just by products of brain cells firing. Instead, they might grow out of a deeper layer of reality... a quantum order beneath the physical world.

Thus, I believe the future of quantum theory will eventually recognize Bohm’s pilot-wave theory as the way... 

The Wi-Fi Analogy in the video...
They describe Bohm’s pilot wave as more like "information" than a force.

Think of it like Wi-Fi:

Your phone is the hardware, but the real coordination comes from invisible signals carrying meaning.

Likewise, neurons may be the brain’s hardware, but consciousness could involve a field of information guiding their activity.

This "informational field" could be part of the fabric of physics itself. Nonlocality without breaking physics...

Here’s where people often get confused. Bohm’s pilot wave is nonlocal... it instantly covers the whole system, no matter how far apart the parts are. It sounds like faster-than-light communication… but it isn’t.

Why? Because the quantum potential is like a background Wi-Fi signal that cannot be tuned or hacked to send messages. You can’t use it to beam Morse code across the galaxy. It guides particles (perhaps thoughts) holistically, but it doesn’t transmit signals that break relativity’s speed limit.

So there’s no violation of Einstein’s rule... just a deeper level of connection.

If telepathy is real, which I think it is, then Bohm’s view makes sense...

Telepathy wouldn’t be one brain sending out thoughts like radio waves. Instead, minds could be unfolding from the same deeper field of information... like laptops all connected to the same invisible Wi-Fi network.

Occasionally, thoughts might line up because they both draw from that hidden wholeness. in Bohm’s sense, that would  mean the deeper implicate order he described, where everything is already enfolded together. 

Just as entangled particles instantly match up without sending signals, two minds could sometimes resonate in the same way... not by transmitting thoughts, but by both drawing from the same hidden order of reality.

So telepathy might just be deeper information links that are always present, flickering into our minds for a moment. Maybe the way to tap into this more deeply is by expanding our consciousness... like realizing we’re already connected to an invisible Wi-Fi network. In this sense, the brain is the hardware, the informational field (the quantum potential) is the guiding signal, consciousness is the antenna, and the implicate order is the ultimate source of the information itself. And when I say consciousness is like an antenna, I don’t mean it’s catching a broadcast... it’s about being sensitive to a field that’s already present everywhere.
 

• Brain = hardware
  
• Informational field / quantum potential = Wi-Fi guiding signal
  
• Consciousness = antenna (sensitive to the field)
  
• Implicate order = deeper source of information (expressed through the pilot wave)
  

[imitator]

Gonna throw this here...

Near Telepathic' Wearable Lets You Communicate Silently With Devices:




Link: AlterEgo

Boston startup AlterEgo unveiled a wearable built on MIT research that converts silent muscle signals into speech, aiming to reshape how we communicate with machines. 
 

AlterEgo is a  non-invasive, wearable, peripheral neural interface that allows humans to converse in natural language with machines, artificial intelligence assistants, services, and other people without any voice—without opening their mouth, and without externally observable movements—simply by articulating words internally.  The feedback to the user is given through audio, via bone conduction,  without disrupting the user's usual auditory perception, and making the interface closed-loop. This enables a human-computer interaction that is subjectively experienced as completely internal to the human user—like speaking to one's self.