In the interest of transparency, DOJ releases complete Maxwell interview...

[putnam6]

In the interest of transparency,
@TheJusticeDept
is releasing the complete transcript and audio of my proffer of Ms. Maxwell.

https://www.justice.gov/maxwell-interview

[FlyersFan]

.... and ....?
What else?
Good that they did that.
But there is so much more .....

[DBCowboy]

Before anyone starts in, if there's no evidence of Trump pedophilia, then the evil left will say that is proof of Trump pedophilia.

[Oldcarpy2]

Before anyone starts in, if there's no evidence of Trump pedophilia, then the evil left will say that is proof of Trump pedophilia.

Evil left here.....nope .


Cos Ghastly Ghislaine says no.

So that's all cleared up then.....

[DBCowboy]

Evil left here.....nope .


Cos Ghastly Ghislaine says no.

So that's all cleared up then.....

Thank you for validating my post.

 

[Unknownparadox]

.... and ....?
What else?
Good that they did that.
But there is so much more .....

If there is so much more. Why didn't we have it so much sooner? I keep hearing justice and transparency is tied to a campaign promise. But some how that concept eludes me.

[putnam6]

If there is so much more. Why didn't we have it so much sooner? I keep hearing justice and transparency is tied to a campaign promise. But some how that concept eludes me.

I get the concept of NDA's and Presidential authority... it is what it is... Im not a fan, but it is the reality.

THIS IS WHY NO administration could release them completely

https://x.com/i/grok/share/pgP3lysFv89f1FdOyPoQsg4wp

 In summary, the President lacks the direct authority to open a sealed court case or void NDAs. Any action would need to go through the courts or involve specific legal mechanisms, respecting the independence of the judiciary.

Can the President open a sealed court case with NDAs
 
 
The President of the United States does not have unilateral authority to open a sealed court case or override non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) tied to judicial proceedings. Sealed court cases and NDAs fall under the jurisdiction of the judicial branch, which operates independently of the executive branch. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Sealed Court Cases: 
   • Court cases are sealed by judges to protect sensitive information, such as national security, trade secrets, or personal privacy. The President cannot directly intervene to unseal a case, as this would violate the separation of powers outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
     
   • To unseal a case, a formal legal process is required, typically involving a motion filed with the court by an interested party with standing. The court, not the President, decides whether to unseal based on legal merits, such as public interest or changed circumstances.
     
   • In rare cases, the President could exert influence indirectly, such as by directing the Department of Justice (DOJ) to file a motion if the case involves federal interests. However, the court retains final authority.
     
2. NDAs in Court Cases:
   • NDAs are private contracts or court-ordered agreements. The President has no legal power to nullify or modify private contracts unless they conflict with federal law or national security, and even then, it would require judicial or legislative action.
     
   • If an NDA is part of a sealed case, the same judicial process for unsealing applies. The President cannot bypass this without legal justification.
     
3. Executive Powers and Limitations:
   • The President could potentially use executive authority, such as issuing an executive order or declassifying information, if the sealed case involves classified government documents. For example, if a case was sealed due to national security, the President could declassify relevant materials, which might prompt a court to reconsider the seal. However, this is context-specific and still subject to judicial review.
     
   • The President cannot override NDAs or court seals arbitrarily, as this would likely be challenged as an overreach of executive power and could be struck down by courts.
     
4. Practical Considerations:
   • Any attempt by a President to interfere with a sealed case or NDA would likely face significant legal and political scrutiny, potentially leading to lawsuits or accusations of abusing power.
     
   • If the case involves federal agencies or employees, the President might have some leverage through administrative channels, but this would not extend to private parties or state courts.
     

In summary, the President lacks the direct authority to open a sealed court case or void NDAs. Any action would need to go through the courts or involve specific legal mechanisms, respecting the independence of the judiciary. If you have a specific case or context in mind, I can search for additional details or analyze relevant information if provided!

[cherokeetroy]

Maxwell is innocent! 

She never should have been tried

I guess it's time for a pardon

[guyfriday]

Before anyone starts in, if there's no evidence of Trump pedophilia, then the evil left will say that is proof of Trump pedophilia.

since you stated this on the internet, and the internet never lies, then Trump must be impeached.

Ok back to reality, these recording are interesting in that it paints Maxwell in a way that was disputed by those who took her to court. It's going to be one of those "Since everyone took a cookie from the jar, we have to have a death-pact to not talk about it" thing. 

I mean it could be possible the Bill Clinton didn't do any naughty-naughty to any kids, but what's the definition of kids? In some states 12 year olds are able to make choices for themselves. Even RBG wanted to drop the age of consent down to 12 years old. So if Bill Clinton was knocking around a 12+ year old, Maxwell could legally say that she didn't see him do anything wrong. Weird how it's not always the words you use that matter, but instead it could be the meaning of those words that do you in.

[Unknownparadox]

I get the concept of NDA's and Presidential authority... it is what it is... Im not a fan, but it is the reality.

THIS IS WHY NO administration could release them completely

https://x.com/i/grok/share/pgP3lysFv89f1FdOyPoQsg4wp

 In summary, the President lacks the direct authority to open a sealed court case or void NDAs. Any action would need to go through the courts or involve specific legal mechanisms, respecting the independence of the judiciary.

I have no doubt that is true. I haven't seen anyone trying to get this information unlocked. The trump DOJ did request the grand jury files be released, and in light of the situation, and people possible involved. I think that would be a good idea in the name of transparency. But the judge said there no new information in the grand jury files, so he was going to keep secret what we already know.