Ghislaine Maxwell says Epstein client list does not exist

[BeTheGoddess]

Nothing to see here...

Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted associate of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has told US officials that a much-discussed "client list" does not exist.
The Trump administration has faced pressure to disclose information about Epstein, with whom Donald Trump was friendly before.
Maxwell was interviewed in July and, according to the released transcript, said she did not witness any inappropriate conduct by Trump or former President Bill Clinton.
She also called allegations of Prince Andrew having sexual relations with an underage girl in Maxwell's home "mind-blowingly not conceivable".

Ghislaine Maxwell interview transcripts released by US justice department - BBC News
[/quote]

[andy06shake]

Nothing to see here...

Ghislaine Maxwell interview transcripts released by US justice department - BBC News

The same person who was charged with perjury in connection with her 2016 depositions. 

Who are they going to pull out next to suggest Trump knows nothing?

Or has any connection to the convicted pedophile he was best friends with for 14 odd years, Bill Cosby ffs? 

[Unknownparadox]

Nothing to see here...

Ghislaine Maxwell interview transcripts released by US justice department - BBC News

How would she know if the government has a client list. Or if Epstein had a list, since she wasn't in on his sex scandal. But it isn't just politicians not wanting those files released. Judges aren't releasing them either.

[andy06shake]

How would she know if the government has a client list. Or if Epstein had a list, since she wasn't in on his sex scandal. But it isn't just politicians not wanting those files released. Judges aren't releasing them either.

Those files are a red herring and not what the people are predominantly after being released.  

As Trump and his administration well know, judges do so to protect victims, ongoing investigations, and due process.

If Trump wishes to release the information, he can do so with the press of a key same way Bondi or Patel could.

But they won't because he's implicated, and those people are now part of the very same system they said they would destroy. 

You can't drain the swamp if you join it.

[Unknownparadox]

Those files are a red herring and not what the people are predominantly after being released.  

As Trump and his administration well know, judges do so to protect victims, ongoing investigations, and due process.

If Trump wishes to release the information, he can do so with the press of a key same way Bondi or Patel could.

But they won't because he's implicated, and those people are now part of the very same system they said they would destroy. 

You can't drain the swamp if you join it.

I agree there is a cover up. But it's the entire government not just the politicians. It's the job of judges to make sure the government doesn't over step it's authority or out right break the law. The names of victims and the grand jury can be redacted. Although I am not a believer in accusing someone from secrecy. Since the government could easily make up a victim, and of course they need to be protected so we don't get to know who they are.

[andy06shake]

I agree there is a cover up. But it's the entire government not just the politicians. It's the job of judges to make sure the government doesn't over step it's authority or out right break the law. The names of victims and the grand jury can be redacted. Although I am not a believer in accusing someone from secrecy. Since the government could easily make up a victim, and of course they need to be protected so we don't get to know who they are.

The truth is we will never know how deep it goes unless Trump produces the goods.

Promises must be performed. 

But yes, judges act as a check on government power.

They ensure that laws are applied fairly.

And that government actions comply with the Constitution.

[BeTheGoddess]

Red herring or not, its still news on the topic, and haviing it scrutinized is why we're here?

[Unknownparadox]

The truth is we will never know how deep it goes unless Trump produces the goods.

Promises must be performed. 

But yes, judges act as a check on government power.

They ensure that laws are applied fairly.

And that government actions comply with the Constitution.

That's why they need to release what files they have, Instead of this B.S.

In his 31-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer of the Southern District of New York criticized the Department of Justice for using "demonstrably false" reasoning to justify the release of grand jury testimony.
The transcripts would "not reveal new information of any consequence" about Epstein and Maxwell's crimes, according to Judge Engelmayer, who suggested that the Trump administration's push to release documents might be an intentional "diversion."
 "Its entire premise -- that the Maxwell grand jury materials would bring to light meaningful new information about Epstein's and Maxwell's crimes, or the Government's investigation into them -- is demonstrably false," he wrote.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-rejects-...=124542685

Here this judge is telling us he is going to keep secret what we already know. If we already know what he has, then releasing it with names redacted isn't going to hurt anything. But again, I am not keen on accusing someone from secrecy, that needs to go. It reeks of dictatorship. Anyone can be tried and imprisoned with secret witnesses.

[andy06shake]

Red herring or not, its still news on the topic, and haviing it scrutinized is why we're here?

Indeed.

[ReturnofBroccoli]