Greenland USA

[Oldcarpy2]

I don't do X but apparently he's just praised our UK military in Afghan so that's something, even if not an actual apology.

[andy06shake]

Thats more like it.

"The GREAT and very BRAVE soldiers of the United Kingdom will always be with the United States of America.
"In Afghanistan, 457 died, many were badly injured, and they were among the greatest of all warriors. It’s a bond too strong to ever be broken. The U.K. Military, with tremendous Heart and Soul, is second to none (except for the U.S.A.!). We love you all, and always will! President DONALD J. TRUMP."

Obviously, someone who actually knows their @rse from their elbow had a word.

The President called the soldiers "second to none" after Keir Starmer confronted him on Saturday following the "shocking and appalling" remarks

https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/trump-back...CawPkt00Qw

[Oldcarpy2]

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...e73f64.jpg]

Thats more like it.

Obviously, someone who actually knows their @rse from their elbow had a word.

https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/trump-back...CawPkt00Qw

Senile old man has been told he's been a total arsehole.

He needs telling that more.

[cherokeetroy]

This is the absurdity that I am observing 

The side that calls for Law and Order

Is the same side that thinks Trump shouldn't be inconvenienced by International Law and Order if it interferes with his ecletic negotiating style

[Vermilion]

This is the absurdity that I am observing 

The side that calls for Law and Order

Is the same side that thinks Trump shouldn't be inconvenienced by International Law and Order if it interferes with his ecletic negotiating style

Optics aside, you can’t argue with results.
As you will remember, even Lamar’s limp wristed throwing style didn’t stop him from winning.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=je7_wMfiMs...b3dpbmc%3D

[cherokeetroy]

Optics aside, you can’t argue with results.
As you will remember, even Lamar’s limp wristed throwing style didn’t stop him from winning.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=je7_wMfiMs...b3dpbmc%3D

I appreciate that you're honest enough to admit the double standard

[Harte]

That's not the "diabolical" part.

And it's not the first time he's said horrible things about soldiers, including your own. 

"Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers." about U.S. war dead at Aisne-Marne American Cemetery.

"They were suckers." referring to U.S. Marines killed at Belleau Wood. 

"You think I’m stupid? I wasn’t going to Vietnam." 

But he's still not getting Greenland, so...

TDS

People there at the time said he never said that.
I suppose you think he believes there are "fine people" among white supremacists and that he eats all the ice cream at functions.

Harte

[Harte]

It may also have to do with PAROS; if Denmark signs this (which they seem to support), would it inhibit the actions of the US Space Base on their territory, without sovereignty?

https://geneva.usmission.gov/2024/03/28/...ter-space/

Not impossible.
But I haven't heard anything about the Golden Dome having space-based weaponry.
However, the US DOES need to maintain an arsenal comparable to other superpowers, and that could be required in the future.
Maybe keep the options open.

Harte

[andy06shake]

TDS

People there at the time said he never said that.
I suppose you think he believes there are "fine people" among white supremacists and that he eats all the ice cream at functions.

Harte

It's reported he said it, so what people there at the time "said he never said that?"

Debunk all 3 comments i presented you with, please, if you can.

Because by the looks of it, there are rather conflicting opinions, and plenty of people made the claims that he said things along those lines, along with others on his side.

What about his McCain remarks?

It's kind of hard to deny those.

“He’s not a war hero… I like people that weren’t captured.”

 

“I never liked him as much after that, because I don’t like losers.”

I think Trump plays to his audience, no question about it. 

If they happen to be white supremacists, he will happily hum their tune if it gets him their votes. 

All that aside, Trump is still not getting Greenland. 

Andy.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020...ers-report
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...rs/615997/
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/penta...m-vietnam/

[andy06shake]

Not impossible.
But I haven't heard anything about the Golden Dome having space-based weaponry.
However, the US DOES need to maintain an arsenal comparable to other superpowers, and that could be required in the future.
Maybe keep the options open.

Harte

It's a missile defence system intended to detect and destroy missiles at multiple stages of flight, including the early boost phase.

Something current systems don't reliably do very well, if at all in the boost phase. 

There is speculation that possible future satellites could be armed with beam weaponry.

But that's a pipe dream, harking all the way back to Reagan's "Star Wars" program.

Plus, weaponising space is still illegal as far as im aware.

The satellites will be used for targeting and detection purposes.

Some analysts have estimated the cost to be in the range of trillions of dollars.

Options and possible beam weaponry aside, It certainly won't be cheap and apt to cost an arm and a leg.

Not that it doesn't look rather cool, but I have to ponder that there are better things to spend trillions of dollars on.