Gerrymander based on ideology instead of race

[quintessentone]

Equity is not equality.

And it only benefits those who can't succeed on merit.

I am not discussing equality with you, I am discussing racial equity. Obviously you don't get it and have a mantra playing in your head that makes you feel safe and cozy.

[DBCowboy]

I am not discussing equality with you, I am discussing racial equity. Obviously you don't get it and have a mantra playing in your head that makes you feel safe and cozy.

Racial equity is RACIST.

Gods!

Can you have a discussion without tossing in skin color?

Jeez!

[quintessentone]

Racial equity is RACIST.

Gods!

Can you have a discussion without tossing in skin color?

Jeez!

Racial equity was a racist concept for the whites back in the day. Today racial equity is breaking down racism still within society systems there. See the diff.?

[DBCowboy]

Racial equity was a racist concept for the whites back in the day. Today racial equity is breaking down racism still within society systems there. See the diff.?

No.

You're still focused on skin color.

Get over it Karen.  Its 2026.

People don't care anymore.

Except racists.

[quintessentone]

No.

You're still focused on skin color.

Get over it Karen.  Its 2026.

People don't care anymore.

Except racists.

You aren't living in 2026, you are still living in the '50s definitely not into the 60s, but I don't hold out much hope you will ever get it.

[DBCowboy]

You aren't living in 2026, you are still living in the '50s hopefully not into the 60s, but I don't hold out much hope.

I'm the only one of the two of us not focused on the melanin content of someone's skin for Christs sake!

[quintessentone]

I'm the only one of the two of us not focused on the melanin content of someone's skin for Christs sake!

You are ignoring history, racial equity regarding economics for certain demographics...that is where you fail to understand.

[DBCowboy]

You are ignoring history, racial equity regarding economics for certain demographics...that is where you fail to understand.

Oh ffs

I had an Irish ancestor.

Where's my reparations?

I've had an African ancenstor, where are my reparations?

I know history.  I don't bastardize it like the left does.

History is in the past and that's where you are stuck.

Try looking to the future without being racist.

[chr0naut]

A finding of unconstitutional does not imply a law was broken.
It implies a law is counter to the Constitution and is therefore invalid.
I could list thousands of cases where, according to you, various Presidents (and Congress itself) can be considered to be "lawbreakers" under this weird view of yours.

Harte

If the President has continued to enact his edict despite his edict being declared unconstitutional, he has broken the law.

If a President implements a new law and proceeds without ratification of that law by the Congress, that is contrary to the clear process defined in the Constitution, and therefore automatically unconstitutional, and the President has broken the law.

If a President falsely declares a state of emergency, when all the evidence of need is contrary, so that they can bypass normal Constitutional limitations, then they have broken the law.

Trump has done all of these three.

[quintessentone]

Oh ffs

I had an Irish ancestor.

Where's my reparations?

I've had an African ancenstor, where are my reparations?

I know history.  I don't bastardize it like the left does.

History is in the past and that's where you are stuck.

Try looking to the future without being racist.

​​​​​​​ ​​​​​​​

We all had African ancestors.

The last time I looked Irish people were and are still white, right? Did I miss something?