2 |
3,493 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-15-2026, 03:37 PM)Karl12 Wrote: Ha good to see you on the thread mate and it's all extremely mindboggling - did see this input from Whitney on the construction of a 'digital feudal order' and it sounds very bad.
[Video: https://youtu.be/UDSShUszXhw]
Haven't factored in the killer robots but also looks like we'll be dealing with 'Carbon eugenics'.
It's like Black Mirror on crack lol.
"Oligarchs" is the operative term
They don't like Democracy
It's old, it's slow and I'll suited for the world they envision
They're tired of asking for permission
They feel like they shouldn't have to
Especially from a population of stupid, fat, ugly humans with thinning hair and mid teeth
The Great Experiment had 200+ years to prove itself and it failed
As soon as they gain control over the infrastructure, they'll rule as they see fit
Who's going to stop them
504 |
6,234 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-15-2026, 10:18 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: ...
The Great Experiment had 200+ years to prove itself and it failed
As soon as they gain control over the infrastructure, they'll rule as they see fit
Who's going to stop them
I disagree that it failed.... it was not allowed to succeed.
Things we see today were in many cases things we were warned about...
Monopoly powers, entanglement with foreign interests, "Banks" as monetary policy holders...
The experiment was NOT designed to allow for robber barons and their banking patrons... making political policy...
It wasn't the experiment itself that failed, and perhaps it still might have...
but the measure in who 'sold out' points to a specific direction.
What did fail was whomsoever in the service of the people it fall upon, to monitor the undertakings of the Banking regime, the five or six corporate cabals, the "councils, and committees, commissions, and lobbies".... but for some reason... it falls to others ...
215 |
2,573 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

01-16-2026, 04:12 AM
This post was last modified: 01-16-2026, 04:32 AM by Karl12. 
(01-15-2026, 09:27 PM)SteamyAmerican Wrote: And while it might be a little philosophical or even naive to ask this, it sounds like culling 7/8ths of the entire human species is well within reason for those in power and playing along.
Yes mate in their minds I suppose it is - have posted it before but NWO critters are unsuspectingly filmed here referring to everyone as ' the cannon fodder that unfortunately populates the earth' so reckon that just about sums things up.
The Rockefeller's villa in Bellagio, Italy also hosted the 'Club of Rome' back in 1968 (along with literal Nazis) and I thought there was a wonderful breakdown of all their UN bullshit from 4:10 in this vid.
Here's what the 'club' came up with - basically it's genocide on a truly unprecedented scale and Dennis can be seen virtue signalling about it below.
Quote:• "We can have 1 Billion people with freedom, or 9 Billion slaves. We’re at over 7 Billion right now, so we need to bring that down to 1 Billion. I hope that culling can be peaceful and slow and equal between rich and poor.”
Dennis Meadows - WEF member, Rockefeller Foundation member, Club of Rome member.
Depopulation Virtue Signaling
(01-15-2026, 09:27 PM)SteamyAmerican Wrote: Guess the global environment will just have to deal with boiling oceans, no fresh water, and insane assets used to feed the Grid, while AI Agents and their Terminator drone counterparts trade futures on non-existent goods, in markets not meant for you or me.
Very well said and even if one just factors in mass implementation of 'AI data centres' then it's painfully obvious these people do not give a single, solitary shit about the environment.
Don't know if you've delved deep into it but 'the Rockefellers have funded almost everything regarding climate' and have co-opted people's natural environmental concerns in order to implement all this Malthusian culling of 'human cattle'.
'Globalist elites who want to kill billions of people' - here's the Malaysian Prime Minister warning everyone about it back in 2015.
Quote:Basically, it is about having a world government. We should abolish all states, nations, and bodies but instead have only a one-world government. And that world government is to be by certain people, elites. People who are very rich, very intelligent, very powerful in many ways. They are the ones who will govern the world. There was not much talk about democracy or the choice of leaders, instead, there was to be a government by these elites who will impose their rules on everyone in this world. And for those who are unwilling to submit to them, there will be punishment,” Dr. Mahathir explained.
“And the peace that we will get from this is the peace of the graveyard because the intention also is to reduce the number of people in this world. At the time when the New World Order has annunciated, the population of this world was only 3 billion. The intention was to reduce it to 1 billion. Now the population of the world is 7 billion. There would be a need to kill many billions of people or to starve them to death or to prevent them from giving birth in order to reduce the population of this world.”
Flashback : Former Malaysian Prime Minister Warned -'Elites Want to Reduce World Population to 1 Billion' (Videos)
215 |
2,573 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-15-2026, 10:18 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: They don't like Democracy
It's old, it's slow and I'll suited for the world they envision
They're tired of asking for permission
They feel like they shouldn't have to
Especially from a population of stupid, fat, ugly humans with thinning hair and mid teeth
Yes from what I've seen these NWO goons have utter contempt for democracy (and humanity) mate - that's probably why so many of these Rockefeller, Bilderberg, Trilateral, Chatham House, CFR, WEF etc groups are so unelected and unaccountable.
Looks like the WEF found a workaround by just 'penetrating zee cabinets' and Trilaterals were calling for a curtailing of democracy as far back as 1975 (saying it was a 'crisis' because there was 'too much of it'.)
(01-15-2026, 10:18 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: As soon as they gain control over the infrastructure, they'll rule as they see fit
Reckon that's what really bothers me mate - they'll go batshit crazy and start demanding people's firstborns lol.
Some of Brzezinski's writings are PR speak but we've all heard the rumours of utterly deviant behaviour, Baal Molech worship etc.
Quote:The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values."
Thread
(01-15-2026, 10:18 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: Who's going to stop them
Really don't know but worth noting there truly is an unprecedented amount of awareness going on nowadays - even with normal everyday folk.
Hopefully everybody will get together, absolutely refuse to consent and tell them to f-ck right off.
215 |
2,573 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-15-2026, 05:18 PM)sahgwa Wrote: Then if you want to leave their group, they get angry and try to kill you or keep you in, just for control, and at its very heart, because misery loves company.
Hey mate did you catch this bankster poem?
Very apt.
From 1:00
The 1966 book 'Tragedy And Hope' is mentioned in the vid and looks like top down technocratic world government (and smart cities) were being planned even back then.
VIDEO
2 |
3,493 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-16-2026, 08:14 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Hopefully everybody will get together, absolutely refuse to consent and tell them to f-ck right off.
[Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmilies/beer.gif]
I do have hope
But without Deus Ex Machina I don't know how we win
Currently, AI/Tech is single handedly propping up US economy
Tech must be allowed to innovate
Otherwise, US economy collapses and loses AI race
But current governing systems are too slow, too restrictive
Technological innovation means innovation of governance
The cheapest way to do this is by building new states and experimenting rather than the costly process of revolutions
Either option, innovation or no innovation, the free world as we have come to recognize it, loses
Innovation requires immediate access to resources-- energy
Any human or system that competes for resources or stands in the way is seen as a hindrance
28 |
2,671 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-16-2026, 02:13 PM)Karl12 Wrote: Hey mate did you catch this bankster poem?
Very apt.
From 1:00
[Video: https://youtu.be/8jvOmkd08Mg]
The 1966 book 'Tragedy And Hope' is mentioned in the vid and looks like top down technocratic world government (and smart cities) were being planned even back then.
VIDEO
[Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmilies/beer.gif]
Very good poem that most of us here know to be true.
The other ones are fighting it out about ICE or something ;)
The real battle is a personal spiritual battle.
Oh and I saw that he had a grammar error to make it rhyme ? Shouldn't it have been BEGAN not BEGUN? But then son wouldn't rhyme.
thanks mate
I will get me an ale this weekend
gulp.
215 |
2,573 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-16-2026, 02:14 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: I do have hope
But without Deus Ex Machina I don't know how we win
Truly do appreciate the insight mate and I do accept all this is an incredibly convoluted (and geopolitically messy) conundrum.
Having said that, as the guy asks in the original video if they do manage to achieve a thriving global economy with no people in it then where's the safety net and (more importantly) what's the point?
I'll admit to not knowing much about the world of financial technopoly but I can see decades old plans coming to fruition and the anti-human agenda realising itself in real time.
Did you ever catch this documented United Nations plan to herd everyone into smart-slave cities? They've even got a 'Wildlands Project' map where 50% of land area in United States will be 'off limits' to human beings.
Turns out if folks don't like it then 'multi-media enforcement' in the form of 20 Federal Agencies will then descend on problem communities.
' The reduction of human population by as much as two thirds to three quarters' is also being discussed.
I swear to god our forebears will be sat around in the future asking themselves how on earth did our ancestors allow this to happen.
215 |
2,573 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-16-2026, 02:52 PM)sahgwa Wrote: Very good poem that most of us here know to be true..
Ha thought you'd like that one matey - have been rummaging through the quote collection and did see this one from Rod (let's hope he's not wrong).
Quote:• "Any state, any entity, any ideology that fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of Man…that state is obsolete.
Rod Serling.
Also this one from Acton.
Quote:• "The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks".
Lord Acton.
This one from bankster James Warburg doesn't sound good though.
Quote:• "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
James Paul Warburg, whose family co-founded the Federal Reserve – while speaking before the United States Senate, February 17, 1950
In that poem the bankster boasts about 'funding the Nazis' so no surprise that James Warburgh (whose family helped create the Federal Reserve) was the brother of Max Warburg who co-founded I.G.Farben.
Here's yet another quote from the Nuremberg trials and reckon it's one of the most important statements of the last century.
Quote:• "These IG Farben criminals, not the lunatic Nazi fanatics, are the main war criminals. If the guilt of these criminals is not brought to light and if they are not punished, they will represent a much greater threat to the future peace of the world than Hitler if he were still alive.”
General Telford Taylor - Nuremberg Trials.
2 |
3,493 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

01-17-2026, 02:46 PM
This post was last modified: 01-17-2026, 03:00 PM by cherokeetroy. 
(01-17-2026, 03:51 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Truly do appreciate the insight mate and I do accept all this is an incredibly convoluted (and geopolitically messy) conundrum.
Having said that, as the guy asks in the original video if they do manage to achieve a thriving global economy with no people in it then where's the safety net and (more importantly) what's the point?
I'll admit to not knowing much about the world of financial technopoly but I can see decades old plans coming to fruition and the anti-human agenda realising itself in real time.
Did you ever catch this documented United Nations plan to herd everyone into smart-slave cities? They've even got a 'Wildlands Project' map where 50% of land area in United States will be 'off limits' to human beings.
Turns out if folks don't like it then 'multi-media enforcement' in the form of 20 Federal Agencies will then descend on problem communities.
'The reduction of human population by as much as two thirds to three quarters' is also being discussed.
[Video: https://youtu.be/JE0Zlx14PU8]
[Video: https://youtu.be/TzEEgtOFFlM]
I swear to god our forebears will be sat around in the future asking themselves how on earth did our ancestors allow this to happen.
[Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmilies/beer.gif]
I follow many of them across social media
Read their writings...attempting to understand their worldview
I don't know if they envision a future totally void of all humans
I think they envision a future void of our particular version of human
We're diseased
We've been polluted, poisoned, brainwashed and dumbed down
Not exactly the best specimen of our race
We're mutants or "mutts"
They observe current governing systems & societies and see abject failure at every level
We are leaving the Information Age and entering the Age of Intelligence
Remnants of old systems and traditions will be seen as flawed and outdated
Think tanks --obsolete
Learning from mistakes -- waste of time and resources
Trial and error -- unevolved
Every scenario will be run through hundreds or thousands of simulations to calculate precise outcomes
Humans will be augmented through robotics and bioengineering
The mission is to create a superhuman race or races
Reproduction will be handled in labs through the use of artificial wombs where they have control over the genomic blueprint
No more leaving the desired trajectory of human evolution to chance or fate
As we transition into this new era, people will become less and less essential which makes us a despensible liability
The only real value I think we'll have left is our DNA
They want a full genomic database of every living organism in order to catalog every species and microorganism
They're working on capturing that information
Speaking of smart-slave cities, I've been following this project called California Forever
A plan to develop a 15 minute city near Silicon Valley
They call it a "walkable city"
Big surprise -- Marc Andreessen is a major investor (also invested in Praxis Nation)
They've faced a lot of pushback from local communities but they are now proposing a revival of ship building as a selling feature
I think we're going to see a lot more of these cities cropping up in the near future
Start-up cities, 15 minute cities, Smart cities
And their Network Nations (kingdoms) will be centrally located
Like OZ
|