1 |
6 |
| JOINED: |
May 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(05-29-2026, 06:17 PM)Encounter Wrote: i think it is a wrong way of putting things of what people want. And some of us here on DI or else are not stupid as you suggest. It is more complicated then meets your eye.
What is 'disclosure' to you? Question to all here on DI.
UFO files release was and is a huge reinforcement of my long time believes if you ask me. I do not need a disclosure personally. Those videos are good enough at this point in time.
Disclosure to me is getting real proof about aliens and their vehicles.
What is getting released to the public now is just to give the government/agencies a safety net for when secret tech is being spotted in the wild.
None of what is released today indicates that we are being visited by aliens.
9 |
1,169 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(05-30-2026, 11:21 AM)iAlrakis Wrote: Disclosure to me is getting real proof about aliens and their vehicles.
What is getting released to the public now is just to give the government/agencies a safety net for when secret tech is being spotted in the wild.
None of what is released today indicates that we are being visited by aliens.
Exactly. Misdirection for the masses.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
9 |
1,169 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(05-29-2026, 06:17 PM)Encounter Wrote: i think it is a wrong way of putting things of what people want. And some of us here on DI or else are not stupid as you suggest. It is more complicated then meets your eye.
What is 'disclosure' to you? Question to all here on DI.
UFO files release was and is a huge reinforcement of my long time believes if you ask me. I do not need a disclosure personally. Those videos are good enough at this point in time.
Good. Then you won't mind when several "disclosures* are debunked as nothing special, just thrown in to confuse things. No one said you are stupid but people in general are.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
0 |
10 |
| JOINED: |
May 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(05-30-2026, 11:21 AM)iAlrakis Wrote: Disclosure to me is getting real proof about aliens and their vehicles.
What would that proof be? To show you a real craft? Then some still won't believe. It is a mental dissonance that one has to overcome, in my opinion.
17 |
1,462 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(05-29-2026, 06:17 PM)Encounter Wrote: What is 'disclosure' to you? Question to all here on DI.
In the UFO context, I don't think there's anything to disclose, as I don't think anyone knows more than we all know.
And when I say know I mean really know, supported with verifiable data.
1 |
6 |
| JOINED: |
May 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(05-30-2026, 03:09 PM)Encounter Wrote: What would that proof be? To show you a real craft? Then some still won't believe. It is a mental dissonance that one has to overcome, in my opinion.
That some still wouldn't believe is the least of my worries. The most important point here is that if you want you convince people of something you need irrefutable proof. If some still don't believe it that's another topic.
1 |
6 |
| JOINED: |
May 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(05-30-2026, 02:08 PM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: Good. Then you won't mind when several "disclosures* are debunked as nothing special, just thrown in to confuse things. No one said you are stupid but people in general are.
This! 
0 |
10 |
| JOINED: |
May 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(05-30-2026, 03:31 PM)ArMaP Wrote: In the UFO context, I don't think there's anything to disclose, as I don't think anyone knows more than we all know.
I think so too.
9 |
1,169 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(05-30-2026, 04:45 PM)Encounter Wrote: I think so too.
I think they are "disclosing" what they know is safe. Misidentifications, fake reports, hoaxes, old experimental project sightings.
They may know there are a few reports that they can't explain because they really don't know what they are. Those will not be released.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
0 |
10 |
| JOINED: |
May 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
05-31-2026, 05:26 PM
This post was last modified: 05-31-2026, 05:30 PM by Encounter.
(05-30-2026, 11:29 PM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: I think they are "disclosing" what they know is safe. Misidentifications, fake reports, hoaxes, old experimental project sightings.
They may know there are a few reports that they can't explain because they really don't know what they are. Those will not be released.
Great.
What do you mean 'safe'? Safe to our sanity or safe to release sensitive data?
I think, all of what they released in latest videos no one can explain....aside of NHI involved. May be in exception of a few clips.
Those videos from Pentagon are tough to digest, I understand. Although our brains need to re wire to accept what is coming and remain sain. After all, NHI can increase their presence and reveal themselves more open...Fly lower, closer, in more numbers (think of NJ/NY drones).
|
