Disclosure has begun

[BeyondKnowledge]

Great.
What do you mean 'safe'? Safe to our sanity or safe to release sensitive data?
I think, all of what they released in latest videos no one can explain....aside of NHI involved. May be in exception of a few clips.
Those videos from Pentagon are tough to digest, I understand. Although our brains need to re wire to accept what is coming and remain sain. After all, NHI can increase their presence and reveal themselves more open...Fly lower, closer, in more numbers (think of NJ/NY drones).

"Safe". As in no release of any government projects (all governments). No release of any real evidence of extra terrestrials (this includes time, deminsional, religious, etc.. beings or objects). No release of anything that will threaten government power (again, all governments). 

They just threw out the scraps they have collected through the years. Nothing meaningful if not already known. 

You know, "Safe".

[Waterglass]

But that isn’t what you said you were.

And if you really were what you said you were (or what you are now claiming you are), you wouldn't have to cut and paste from Google AI to explain it to me.

Good luck convincing someone else. You haven’t even got to first base with me.

Hi, I am back and I didn't convince you. Oh well. I still stand by my bet. Anyway I have been binge watching about the Mashafa Kidan, Garima Gospels, Exiabr and Jacques Mercier as all that would cancel out the majority of existing global religions.  As far as ET goes, IMO they are fallen angels and would be here to deceive in relation to any disclosure thereof.  

I cut and paste to make it easy for the masses as AI now rules the roost; unfortunately.

[Waterglass]

Not sure how things work in the US but I would edit your post if possible as it may include personally identifying information and enough information to violate the federal court order (if things work anything like in the UK) - My Uncle was a confidential source/intelligence asset in the UK and falsely imprisoned for years as it was illegal for him to mention the fact until a judge refused extradition to the US (who he also worked for) and exhonorated him as innocent by naming all the people involved. 

It can be seen as harmful to national security or aiding and abetting the enemy to provide details on such subjects unless a judge or intel/gov agency has formally cleared you to do so. Online/forums are often included in public media umbrella and punishment for the individual/their family can come decades afters such conditions are meant to have ended.

Thanks and I thought about it before I wrote.  I didnt mention the specific incidents like Julian A. did and look what they did to him.