Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

[DBCowboy]

That is factually untrue.

Statistically, more people are killed by those who lean Right.

Prove it.

[DBCowboy]

Are you asking which side utilizes their 1st amendment rights granted to them written by the Constitution delegation in 1787?

Might want to ask Charlie Kirk that quest-. . . . . wait, what?

[AnAlternateOpinion]

Now, which side more often and more publicly celebrates the killing of ones on the other side? 

Get real. You can’t tell me if Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, George Soros, Bill Gates, Rosie O’Donnell, Whoopi Goldberg, AOC, Nancy Pelosi and so on were killed or died that “the right” wouldn’t be beside themselves with joy.

[Vermilion]

I suppose none of you lefties heard about that nutter shooting up an ABC building.
You guessed it…..
Another lefty shooter.

Arrest made after shots fired at ABC affiliate in Sacramento

Video from the scene showed a window with at least three bullet holes.
The gunfire comes as the station reported that protesters had gathered outside Thursday to decry ABC's decision to pull Jimmy Kimmel's late-night show from air over comments about Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna232548

[ANNEE]

Prove it.

quintessentone

Has multiple times.

[DBCowboy]

quintessentone

Has multiple times.

That also is not true.

[UltraBudgie]

That also is not true.

The study was still available on the Justice Department website last week, but a researcher on extremism posted on social media that it had been removed in the days after the killing of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.

“The number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism,” the study says.

“Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives,” the study states.

“In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.”

The removal of the study was first reported Tuesday by 404 Media, which credited Daniel Malmer, a Ph.D. student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who is studying extremism, with first noticing the removal of the study Sept. 13.

In a post on social media, Malmer said the study had been visible the day before.

The Justice Department did not respond to request for comment on the removal of the study, but the page now says the department is “reviewing its websites … in accordance with recent Executive Orders.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/administrat...ism-study/

Still available (for now) via archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/202509111651...306123.pdf (13 page PDF)

[RazorV66]

Get real. You can’t tell me if Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, George Soros, Bill Gates, Rosie O’Donnell, Whoopi Goldberg, AOC, Nancy Pelosi and so on were killed or died that “the right” wouldn’t be beside themselves with joy.

I don't play that shit.

I've lost too many people in my life, good and bad, to never celebrate anyone's death.

End of story.

[DBCowboy]

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...-01-52.png]

https://thehill.com/homenews/administrat...ism-study/

Still available (for now) via archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/202509111651...306123.pdf (13 page PDF)

If you're going to count racists as far right, then add racist attacks on people by the left.

[UltraBudgie]

If you're going to count racists as far right, then add racist attacks on people by the left.

If you're going to count anarchists as far left, then add anti-government attacks by people on right.

The point is there's nuance:

Diversity in Beliefs

Although it is not uncommon for a particular ideology to dominate the public discourse around extremism, the PIRUS and BIAS data indicate that U.S. extremists and individuals who commit hate crimes routinely come from across the ideological spectrum, including far-right, far-left, Islamist, or single-issue ideologies.

These ideologies break down into particular movements, or sub-ideologies. For instance, in 2018, the PIRUS data identified extremists associated with several anti-government movements, Second Amendment militias, the sovereign citizen movement, white supremacy, ecoterrorism, anarchism, the anti-abortion movement, the QAnon conspiracy theory, and others.10 The prevalence of particular movements can ebb and flow over time depending on political climate and law enforcement priorities, but at no point in recent U.S. history has one set of beliefs completely dominated extremism or hate crime activity.11 Furthermore, the PIRUS and BIAS data reveal that U.S. extremists and individuals who commit hate crimes are often motivated by overlapping views.

For instance, it is common for individuals from the anti-government militia movement to adopt views of white supremacy or for those from the extremist environmental movement to take part in anarchist violence. Nearly 17% of the individuals in PIRUS were affiliated with more than one extremist group or sub-ideological movement, and nearly 15% of the individuals in BIAS selected the victims of their hate crimes because of multiple identity characteristics, such as race and sexual orientation.

And racist attacks generally have much more far-right overlap. Unless you're considering any anarchist attack on establishment power-structures as being "anti-white"?