Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

[ANNEE]

For those who think Charlie Kirk is a racist.
 
Watch this...unless you're afraid of the truth:
https://rumble.com/v6yvwcq-morons-who-th...c_v1_upp_a

It really loses any credibility when you use a strongly biased site.

"Overall, we rate The Liberty Daily Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, the use of sources who routinely fail fact checks, and a complete lack of transparency regarding who is behind the website. (D. Van Zandt 8/30/2019) Updated (01/31/2023)"

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-liberty-daily/

[Vermilion]

It really loses any credibility when you use a strongly biased site.

"Overall, we rate The Liberty Daily Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, the use of sources who routinely fail fact checks, and a complete lack of transparency regarding who is behind the website. (D. Van Zandt 8/30/2019) Updated (01/31/2023)"

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-liberty-daily/

If you didn’t watch that well spoken black man tell his story about how he met Charlie, and what Charlie then did for him, then just say so.

[KKLoco]

Neighbor and acquaintance of the shooter confirms. It's worth the 3 minute watch.

[JefeFeesh]

I never condoned those riots or the killing of poor George by the Police for that matter. 

And i think you know that, so.....

As I said, indifference. It's been your style. 

Fiery, but mostly peaceful...

Maxine Waters said "If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere.'

My original point was that you have a track record of being two-faced, like wallflower pointed out. Your words hold no weight because there are numerous examples where the left does celebrate when bad things happen to their "enemies(the right)." 

You then exemplified my point by your facetious reply.

Maybe you should use a different account if your going to be biased. 

No, I don't want a civil war. I want the problems and to be addressed at the root, but the morons start name calling when exposed, and then they cry "it's time we all come together." I'm disgusted by the hypocrisy.

[andy06shake]

As I said, indifference. It's been your style. 

Fiery, but mostly peaceful...

Maxine Waters said "If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere.'

My original point was that you have a track record of being two-faced, like wallflower pointed out. Your words hold no weight because there are numerous examples where the left does celebrate when bad things happen to their "enemies(the right)." 

You then exemplified my point by your facetious reply.

Maybe you should use a different account if your going to be biased. 

No, I don't want a civil war. I want the problems and to be addressed at the root, but the morons start name calling when exposed, and then they cry "it's time we all come together." I'm disgusted by the hypocrisy.

I'm not the topic of the thread.

And you seem to be looking for a childish argument with your passive-aggressive nonsense.

I suggest you lose the weird fascination and stay on topic.

Everyone's opinion is welcome, whether or not you think it holds weight or not. 

As for hypocrisy, well, you seem to be the one doing the name-calling.

I would also point out that we are only allowed one account each here at "Deny Ignorance", so encouraging a mod, or anyone, to create a duplicate is against the Terms of Service.

I suggest you edit that and stop being so silly.

[cherokeetroy]

If a 22 yo gaming "furry" can plan and execute a successful assassination within a 9 day period, why wouldn't special operations be able to do the same

Link

[ANNEE]

If you didn’t watch that well spoken black man tell his story about how he met Charlie, and what Charlie then did for him, then just say so.

Which proves what?  What one person's opinion is?

I'm sure there are well spoken black men that have opposing opinions.

I'm sure there are many people who are not fans of Charlie that have done wonderful things for someone.

When you present anything from a strongly biased one-sided site -- it loses credibility.

[KKLoco]

Holy Shit! There is a serious plot here. George Zinn, the old man they originally arrested.  Check this out. Go to the 11:15 mark in this video.

[JefeFeesh]

I'm not the topic of the thread.

And you seem to be looking for a childish argument with your passive-aggressive nonsense.

I suggest you lose the weird fascination and stay on topic.

Everyone's opinion is welcome, whether or not you think it holds weight or not. 

As for hypocrisy, well, you seem to be the one doing the name-calling.

I would also point out that we are only allowed one account each here at "Deny Ignorance", so encouraging a mod, or anyone, to create a duplicate is against the Terms of Service.

I suggest you edit that and stop being so silly.

Again, follow the thread. You suggested the right is out of line and pushing for a conflict. You also suggested that the joyous reactions by those of the left are very limited and shouldn't be a concern... it's an exaggeration, similar to the "Antifa is just an idea" rhetoric the left stood behind.

Again, "useful idiot" is acceptable, but moron is name calling... I also didn't advocate for a duplicate account, regardless that isn't a rule. 

There isn't an argument to be had. I, as another member did, pointed out the hypocrisy in your posts, and I mentioned I remember these types of responses from you on a different forum. I gave you a couple of examples where the left was just as dismissive to a critical event, which is the same attitude you are engaged in.

That is why this atrocity took place. The left teaches it's okay to throw a fit when you don't have your ideas acknowledged, and when that fit hurts a republican, it is justified. When that kind of response is trivialized, it will repeat, stronger.

The only editing I would do would be to change "your" to "you're."

[andy06shake]

Again, follow the thread. You suggested the right is out of line and pushing for a conflict. You also suggested that the joyous reactions by those of the left are very limited and shouldn't be a concern... it's an exaggeration, similar to the "Antifa is just an idea" rhetoric the left stood behind.

Again, "useful idiot" is acceptable, but moron is name calling... I also didn't advocate for a duplicate account, regardless that isn't a rule. 

There isn't an argument to be had. I, as another member did, pointed out the hypocrisy in your posts, and I mentioned I remember these types of responses from you on a different forum. I gave you a couple of examples where the left was just as dismissive to a critical event, which is the same attitude you are engaged in.

That is why this atrocity took place. The left teaches it's okay to throw a fit when you don't have your ideas acknowledged, and when that fit hurts a republican, it is justified. When that kind of response is trivialized, it will repeat, stronger.

The only editing I would do would be to change "your" to "you're."

You sound rather angry.

Anybody pushing for conflict is out of line.

which stands to reason. 

Have a nice day.