Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

[SomeStupidName]

That's true, but we don't have a Democrat president in office atm

Which is why the focus is on Trump and his antics

That's funny when Biden was in office you were still more focused on Trump and his antics, I know for a fact we had several discussions on Trump during that four year period

[cherokeetroy]

That's funny when Biden was in office you were still more focused on Trump and his antics, I know for a fact we had several discussions on Trump during that four year period

You're lying

When Biden took office, I was still posting in the Q thread where the discussion focused on topics like

Epstein 
Corrupt Democrats 
Rhinos
a stolen election 
Covid propaganda and lies
Biden's corrupt business dealings with Burisma in Ukraine 
Leaked images from Hunter's laptop exposing illegal illicit activities 
World Economic Forum

What exactly were Trump’s antics during Biden's term?

[SomeStupidName]

You're lying

When Biden took office, I was still posting in the Q thread where the discussion focused on topics like

Epstein 
Corrupt Democrats 
Rhinos
a stolen election 
Covid propaganda and lies
Biden's corrupt business dealings with Burisma in Ukraine 
Leaked images from Hunter's laptop exposing illegal illicit activities 
World Economic Forum

What exactly were Trump’s antics during Biden's term?

Sorry, I was sure I had conversation with you before this year regarding Trump antics.

[cherokeetroy]

Sorry, I was sure I had conversation with you before this year regarding Trump antics.

It wasn't me, I voted for Trump

I didn't turn against him until this election

[Kwaka]

If Charlie was wearing body armour, then the direction of the bullet coming from the prime suspect, getting deflected, deformed and losing momentum from the armour, to then create an entry wound in the neck and lodge in his body does appears possibly reasonable. Depends on what kind of damage was sustained to the armour to take most of the hit?

Yet there is no clear evidence that Charlie was wearing armor and the above theory falls apart. This following video does explain what happened to Charlie if he was not wearing any body armour.




There was a second shooter to the right side of Charlie at an elevated position. The wound on the neck is from the bullet exit. There is a small about of blood vapor visible where the bullet entry is at the side of the head.

I have not seen the autopsy report. One description of it describe the bullet getting found under the skin with no exit wound. It does have that JFK bouncing bullet vibe with the way the investigations are going.

[WallFlowerActive]

If Charlie was 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/14/us/po...ation.html


 That’s what a bullet looks like. And it took a photo.

Your blob looks more like a bug moving just a little to fast for frame rate / shutter speed.

[Kwaka]

 
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/IMG_1176.jpeg]
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/14/us/po...ation.html

 That’s what a bullet looks like. And it took a photo.

Your blob looks more like a bug moving just a little to fast for frame rate / shutter speed.

For my interpretation of that photo, what is being seen in the trail is the vaporized skin and blood caught in the turbulence of the bullet path.

There is a slower, but similar puff of splatter in the video of Charlie on his head that does line up with the exit wound on the neck. This will point to the direction the bullet came from.

[WallFlowerActive]

This will point to the direction the bullet came from.

Or exited.  

As far as entry wombs leaking blood.  You understand the heart is a liquid pump and keeps the circulation system under pressure.  Anytime it’s compromised it’s going to dribble to squirt blood depending if a vane or artery is hit and to what degree it’s compromised.  You can bleed to death through an entry womb if an artery is hit and that’s the direction it bleeds out.  Or you could die from internal hemorrhaging.  

You remind me of some person on ATS that posted childish and ridiculous things concerning the Trump assassin attempt in Pennsylvania.  Ideas with zero evidence and credibility.

[Kwaka]

You remind me of some person on ATS that posted childish and ridiculous things concerning the Trump assassin attempt in Pennsylvania.  Ideas with zero evidence and credibility.

You did not keep up to find zero evidence. I kept an open mind, looked at many theories. Only found 1 shooter on the roof that had 1 security on the ground return a few rounds with 1 50 cal sniper on the roof finishing the job. 

If you think that is childish and ridiculous I would like to hear how?

[sahgwa]

Andrew Torba of Gab Inc. always writes good pieces, this is a selection from his recent essay on how the Progressive left is in his eyes is beyond redemption, and how this ideology leads to societal collapse:

'There are moments in history when the veil is lifted, and the true nature of an ideology is laid bare for all to see. The aftermath of the cowardly assassination of Charlie Kirk was one of those moments. While patriots across America mourned the loss of a bold voice for freedom, truth, and the future of our nation, the Left erupted in celebration.
They laughed. They cheered. They shared memes. They hailed the murderer as a hero. They desecrated the memory of a man gunned down for the simple act of speaking truth.
This is not an anomaly. This is not the work of a few bad apples. This is the logical endpoint of liberalism: a death cult that worships at the altar of destruction.
At its core, this ideology venerates death. It champions the right to end innocent life in the womb, rebranding the slaughter of the unborn as “healthcare” and a sacred right. It encourages the chemical and surgical mutilation of healthy young bodies, a grotesque parody of medicine that severs the individual from their own biological reality. It pushes policies that dissolve the fundamental bonds of family and community, leaving isolated, atomized individuals adrift in a meaningless sea of consumer choices and state dependency.
Now, they celebrate political assassinations.
This is who they are. This is what they believe in. There is no life in their ideology only decay, degradation, and death. They cannot create, so they destroy. They cannot build, so they tear down. They cannot defend truth, so they silence those who speak it.
Charlie Kirk was a threat to them not because he was violent, not because he preached hatred, but because he represented something they despise: life, vitality, courage, and a future for our people. He stood for the America they are trying to erase. In their twisted world, the murder of a young man with a family, friends, and a mission is cause for joy. In their moral vacuum, the blood of the innocent is just another tool in their war against God, nature, and order.
We see you. We see your hatred. We see your emptiness. We see the hollow, lifeless eyes of a movement that has nothing left to offer but destruction, and we will not be silenced. We will mourn Charlie. We will honor his legacy. We will continue his work. And we will remember this moment, the moment the death cult showed its true face to the world.
They think this will frighten us into submission. They are wrong. It only strengthens our resolve.
For we are the builders. We are the defenders. We are the bearers of life, faith, and hope. We will never stop fighting for the future they are so desperate to destroy.
The modern liberal worldview is a hollowed-out edifice built upon a foundation of nihilism and resentment. It is not merely misguided; it is, in its essence, a metaphysical rebellion against creation itself. Its pillars are not principles of life, order, or continuity, but glorifications of decay, fragmentation, and ultimate negation.
'