306 |
6,465 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-22-2025, 11:21 AM)cherokeetroy Wrote: Nuclear fusion is going to power the AI infrastructure
Trillion dollar investments
The MIT professor was working on free energy
His murder wasn’t retaliatory or jealous rage
It was a hit
Nuclear fusion is going to power the AI infrastructure... .initially atleast
Trillion dollar investments .... true nothing suspicious how the world works
The MIT professor was working on free energy .... haven't seen that posted ANYWHERE speculation unless linked
His murder wasn’t retaliatory or jealous rage...
It was a hit.... haven't seen that posted ANYWHERE speculation unless linked, if true it sounds like the movie Telefon
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-22-2025, 12:48 PM)putnam6 Wrote: Nuclear fusion is going to power the AI infrastructure....initially atleast
Trillion dollar investments .... true nothing suspicious how the world works
The MIT professor was working on free energy .... haven't seen that posted ANYWHERE speculation unless linked
His murder wasn’t retaliatory or jealous rage...
It was a hit.... haven't seen that posted ANYWHERE speculation unless linked, if true it sounds like the movie Telefon
Nope, investments with the potential of making upward trillion dollars is never suspicious
Here's discussion of some of his work
Of course believing his murder was a hit is speculative
Most conspiracy theories generally are
28 |
2,671 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Not to mention the research into the sentience of plasmas and how these things all tie into metaphysics and 'everyone is a star' , we go 'to the stars' at death etc etc
306 |
6,465 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-22-2025, 01:27 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: Nope, investments with the potential of making upward trillion dollars is never suspicious
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/AJHUWDV.jpeg]
Here's discussion of some of his work
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/MAoKQth.jpeg]
[Video: https://youtube.com/21qJSIWDTZA?si=p9dzN9ph5EPGOu6T]
Of course believing his murder was a hit is speculative
Most conspiracy theories generally are
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/Ar2pnLD.jpeg]
Yeah so what? as if AI only has nefarious applications and uses
Companies investing in AI, what will we do? when hundreds if not thousands of companies have already invested worldwide
Throughout history, industries, corporations, and companies invest in speculative and new technologies its the way of the world.
What should they invest in the buggy whip?
What if Queen Isabella didn't finance Columbus, and it pushed back the discovery and inevitable exploitation of the "New World" by 25/50/100 years?
Every country in the world is investing in AI.
As for the talented Professor Nuno, you are completely speculating that he has discovered and harnessed the secret to zero-point energy or any other world-changing discovery or innovation.
And why shoot up the innocent Brown University Republican committee VP?
Is that just to throw the scent off
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-22-2025, 02:10 PM)putnam6 Wrote: Yeah so what? as if AI only has nefarious applications and uses
Companies investing in AI, what will we do? when hundreds if not thousands of companies have already invested worldwide
Throughout history, industries, corporations, and companies invest in speculative and new technologies its the way of the world.
What should they invest in the buggy whip?
What if Queen Isabella didn't finance Columbus, and it pushed back the discovery and inevitable exploitation of the "New World" by 25/50/100 years?
Every country in the world is investing in AI.
As for the talented Professor Nuno, you are completely speculating that he has discovered and harnessed the secret to zero-point energy or any other world-changing discovery or innovation.
And why shoot up the innocent Brown University Republican committee VP?
Is that just to throw the scent off
If you have no concerns about the potential misuse or abuse of AI from those in power then good for you
Keep me on "ignore" so you can skip over my posts. No point wasting time in pointless argument
I didn't say Nuno "discovered" or "harnessed" the "secret" to "zero-point energy"
306 |
6,465 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

12-22-2025, 03:27 PM
This post was last modified: 12-22-2025, 03:30 PM by putnam6. 
(12-22-2025, 02:36 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: If you have no concerns about the potential misuse or abuse of AI from those in power then good for you
Keep me on "ignore" so you can skip over my posts. No point wasting time in pointless argument
I didn't say Nuno "discovered" or "harnessed" the "secret" to "zero-point energy"
Funny how you never remember I said I agree with much of your theories overall, the devil is in the details.
You can't just throw out quasi-connected data points and say thats solid iron-clad evidence of a government's manipulation, malfeasance, and complicity
It's circumstantial evidence at best, and it's going to get questioned.
This is what the site is for; if it didn't get questioned, it would be unusual
AGAIN
Why did he shoot up Brown University?
On the surface, it's unhinged AF and sounds juxtaposed to an efficient, well-planned governmental operation.
Its a legitimate question...
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-22-2025, 03:27 PM)putnam6 Wrote: and say thats solid iron-clad evidence of a government's manipulation, malfeasance, and complicity
Where did I say that
306 |
6,465 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-22-2025, 04:06 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: Where did I say that
You used this as an inference that Trump Social is investing in AI, Trump Social AKA Donald J Trump, OMB, the Teflon Don and current President
Quote:Nope, investments with the potential of making upward trillion dollars is never suspicious
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/AJHUWDV.jpeg]
Along with the Portuguese nuclear physicist background
Here's discussion of some of his work
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/MAoKQth.jpeg]
[Video: https://youtube.com/21qJSIWDTZA?si=p9dzN9ph5EPGOu6T]
Of course believing his murder was a hit is speculative
Most conspiracy theories generally are
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/Ar2pnLD.jpeg]
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-22-2025, 04:35 PM)putnam6 Wrote: You used this as an inference that Trump Social is investing in AI, Trump Social AKA Donald J Trump, OMB, the Teflon Don and current President
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...76eea.jpeg]
Along with the Portuguese nuclear physicist background
Here's discussion of some of his work
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/MAoKQth.jpeg]
[Video: https://youtube.com/21qJSIWDTZA?si=p9dzN9ph5EPGOu6T]
Of course believing his murder was a hit is speculative
Most conspiracy theories generally are
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/Ar2pnLD.jpeg]
Can you point out where I said I have "solid iron-clad evidence of a government's manipulation, malfeasance, and complicity"?
Because I can't find it
I do see where I admitted this is a conspiracy theory
Conspiracy theories are mostly built on speculation, conjecture and circumstantial evidence
That's why they're called theories
I could spend days even weeks on a quest for data linking the professor's relationship with the shooter, etc, etc
But anything I post is going to be circumstantial
None of it's going to be solid
Since you made the decision to dismiss circumstantial evidence and instead demand iron-clad proof
I don't see the point in wasting my time
306 |
6,465 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(12-22-2025, 05:44 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: Can you point out where I said I have "solid iron-clad evidence of a government's manipulation, malfeasance, and complicity"?
Because I can't find it
I do see where I admitted this is a conspiracy theory
Conspiracy theories are mostly built on speculation, conjecture and circumstantial evidence
That's why they're called theories
I could spend days even weeks on a quest for data linking the professor's relationship with the shooter, etc, etc
But anything I post is going to be circumstantial
None of it's going to be solid
Since you made the decision to dismiss circumstantial evidence and instead demand iron-clad proof
I don't see the point in wasting my time
Quote:cherokeetroy Wrote:
Nuclear fusion is going to power the AI infrastructure
Trillion dollar investments Declarative sentence
The MIT professor was working on free energy
His murder wasn’t retaliatory or jealous rage
It was a hit Declarative sentence
You linked these 2 statements together
One is about AI investments, and the other was about the MIT professors murder
If the murder wasn't retaliatory or jealous rage, and it was a hit, who sanctioned or sponsored the hit?
The inference is its whoever is making trillion-dollar investments otherwise why link the 2 statements
in which you later used the Truth Social AI investment tweet
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
|