37 |
1,246 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-03-2025, 09:31 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Just because you don't see millions of people protesting doesn't mean they aren't upset or discussing it privately.
Outrage doesn't always show up as giant marches.
There is no doubt about the fact that some of Trump's own base definitely want the Epstein files released.
Because they see it as exposing corruption among elites.
I think there are probably quite a few Trump supporters here who wish said promises to be performed.
Considering it was sitting on Pam Bondi's desk....and then there miraculously was no list.
You said there is a significant percentage, therefore, you must have witnessed millions of people. If you were to say supporters, which you just did, the number would be even larger because he has supporters that aren't even the 77,302,000 Americans who voted for him. Im fairly certain you dont have access to millions of private conversations which you are speculating are happening where people want to see this. So is it speculation or speculation you tried to disguise as fact? What are you gaining from that? WHO DO YOU WORK FOR!?!?! Just kidding lol I love you man
Blink twice if soros got to you! We will start planning the rescue operations
37 |
1,246 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Im just giving ya a hard time now Andy i hope yall get the list you're looking for it'll be nice when people can put it behind them it looks like its causing more divide and its really not whats needed on earth ya know :( sad
97 |
5,862 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(09-03-2025, 09:44 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: You said there is a significant percentage, therefore, you must have witnessed millions of people. If you were to say supporters, which you just did, the number would be even larger because he has supporters that aren't even the 77,302,000 Americans who voted for him. Im fairly certain you dont have access to millions of private conversations which you are speculating are happening where people want to see this. So is it speculation or speculation you tried to disguise as fact? What are you gaining from that? WHO DO YOU WORK FOR!?!?! Just kidding lol I love you man
Blink twice if soros got to you! We will start planning the rescue operations
It's all speculation until Trump provides what was promised.
And just because i don't have a livestream of every MAGA uncle's group chat, nothing exists?
Come on, by that logic, Bigfoot isn't real because he hasn't texted us yet.
Millions of people don't need to be waving pitchforks on your lawn for conversations to be happening.
The reality is a hell of a lot of people want to see those files.
And at this point, im more concerned as to who Trump works for.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
97 |
5,862 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(09-03-2025, 09:46 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: Im just giving ya a hard time now Andy i hope yall get the list you're looking for it'll be nice when people can put it behind them it looks like its causing more divide and its really not whats needed on earth ya know :( sad
Divide and conquer has always been the colour of the day as far back as i can remember.
Point of fact, pretty much over the span of recorded history, if we're honest.
As you know, it's how TPTB keep us at one another's throats as opposed to their own.
As to hard times, naw, far worse people i have to converse with other than yourself.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
37 |
1,246 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-03-2025, 09:51 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Come on, by that logic, Bigfoot isn't real because he hasn't texted us yet.
If you wanted to be a part of Bigfoot's group text all you had to do was ask  you didnt have to go there man you know how sensitive Bigfoot gets
57 |
10,164 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

09-03-2025, 10:01 AM
This post was last modified: 09-03-2025, 10:22 AM by quintessentone. 
(09-03-2025, 09:25 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Oh, please, classic deflection 101 as per usual.
"Where were they for 30 years?" how about in fear, traumatised, and silenced by some very powerful people?
And suggesting survivors had a duty to prevent abuse is disgusting victim-blaming, well done, at least you are consistent as ever.
"Why no names?" stab in the dark, because naming predators isn't as simple as pointing fingers.
It's legally risky and terrifying for a start.
And telling people to subscribe to podcasts for "truth" is just a weak attempt to gaslight and dismiss decades of documented abuse.
And calling it a "carnival."
Yuck, all you're doing is belittling the survivors while ignoring systemic abuse.
Pathetic really.
And exactly the kind of smokescreen rhetoric meant to protect the guilty and shame the victims.
The survivors of the child rapists and traffickers, who held or still hold power in high places, have decided to make up their own list and with the House Oversight Committee's deeper dive investigative efforts will be matching names to bank records, travel records, bystander witness testimony, etc. etc.
The DOJ and government administration is protecting the guilty, that's for sure, as evidenced by catering to Maxwell, while she and Trump's rep laughed and laughed during their interview.
---------
As for opening the big pharma can of worms? Well, big pharma will always sing their own praises so asking them for research to prove their products are safe will always point to them 'singing their praises', which may be the case.
Asking Pfizer and/or other mRNA Covid vax companies to prove it's effectiveness, will be fruitless unless the government understands what it is and how it works, which they do not, IMO.
Meanwhile, other pharma companies are progressing with the RNA technology.
"Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals has partnered with Novartis to advance ARO-SNCA, a preclinical RNA interference (RNAi) therapy designed to silence the SNCA gene responsible for producing alpha-synuclein—a pathogenic protein central to Parkinson’s disease and other synucleinopathies. The therapy leverages Arrowhead’s TRiM platform for subcutaneous delivery to the central nervous system, aiming to achieve durable knockdown of alpha-synuclein in deep brain regions."
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals and Novartis Enter into a Global License and Collaboration Agreement - Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-------------
"Here are the key differences between RNA and mRNA: - Definition: RNA (Ribonucleic Acid) is a molecule essential for coding, decoding, and expression of genes, while mRNA (messenger RNA) is a specific type of RNA that carries genetic information from DNA to the ribosome for protein synthesis.
- Function: mRNA serves as the template for protein synthesis, delivering the instructions from the DNA to the ribosomes where proteins are assembled.
- Types: RNA includes several subtypes, such as mRNA, tRNA (transfer RNA), and rRNA (ribosomal RNA), each playing distinct roles in the process of protein synthesis.
- Processing: mRNA is the processed form of RNA that undergoes modifications after transcription, making it ready for translation into proteins.
- Role in Gene Expression: Both RNA and mRNA are crucial in gene expression, but mRNA specifically acts as the messenger that conveys the genetic code necessary for protein production."
----------------
Looks like this gene expression/modification technology works, clinically on animals.
-----------------
"To date, only approximately 15% of human proteins, out of around 20,000 human proteins, are deemed druggable. [sup]6[/sup] Data suggest that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved only about 700 small-molecule drugs targeting human proteins, [sup]7[/sup] underscoring the vast potential for the development of novel drugs independent of traditionally “druggable targets.” Since 2018, nearly 30% of FDA-approved drugs have been biologics, [sup]8[/sup][sup],[/sup] [sup]9[/sup] with a subset based on nucleic acid, including antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), aptamers, messenger RNAs (mRNAs), siRNAs, and miRNAs. [sup]10[/sup][sup],[/sup] [sup]11[/sup][sup],[/sup] [sup]12[/sup][sup],[/sup] [sup]13[/sup][sup],[/sup] [sup]14[/sup][sup],[/sup] [sup]15[/sup] This marks the emergence of a new era in RNA-based therapeutics. The consecutive FDA approvals of siRNA drugs, Patisiran and Givosiran, have translated the promise of siRNA into clinical reality. [sup]16[/sup] With numerous siRNA and mRNA-based therapeutics in the pipeline, the clinical translation of RNA therapeutics has transitioned from mere “hype” to a tangible “hope.”"
Advancements in clinical RNA therapeutics: Present developments and prospective outlooks - PMC
Understanding the Difference Between RNA and mRNA: Essential Roles in Genetic Processes
"The only journey is the one within."
97 |
5,862 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(09-03-2025, 09:59 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: If you wanted to be a part of Bigfoot's group text all you had to do was ask you didnt have to go there man you know how sensitive Bigfoot gets
He's got me on speed dial.
Where do you think the big hairy b@stards get their premo adrenochrom from to power their cloaking device?
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
306 |
6,461 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

So does Bigfoot have the Epstein list or not...
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
37 |
1,246 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-03-2025, 10:06 AM)putnam6 Wrote: [Image: https://media0.giphy.com/media/gjHuIwidi.../giphy.gif]
So does Bigfoot have the Epstein list or not...
Just dingleberries and matted fur here
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-03-2025, 07:29 AM)andy06shake Wrote: I dont expect anything from you Vermilion, not much point.
And are these 33,295 pages of Epstein-related records new and unredacted?
Or is it more rinse and repeat nonsense we have already seen?
Is Trump's name all over the files like Pam Bondi told him, or redacted?
And have you read the files in their entirety?
I think not, so....
Good luck telling other people what to do.
Let us know how that one works out for you. 
It's just more of the same bullshit
They released these files because they're being panicans (lol) about Thomas Massie's petition
The WH has been threatening members not to sign it
|