DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Big Farma Epstein and much more
#21
(09-03-2025, 08:49 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Well, excuses aside, at least we both want to know what's in those additional 284Gb.

Its a good estimate that Every minute of a video file is about 20-100mb. According to the evidence list they took they found several videos. You will never see those and that probably accounts for 75% of the data or more and the rest they will scan and drip feed when they can. I have no interest in knowing whats in any of it but I want you to know so we can go back to cool things like ghost stories and big foot and peanutbutter syrup sammiches. Also, I doubt the list will ever be a direct thing but will name people indirectly through financial disclosures to protect against defamation lawsuits and slander and things similar to that. Dont want to feed the criminals more money right?
#22
(09-03-2025, 09:00 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: Every minute of a video file is 1gb, according to the evidence list they took they found several videos. You will never see those and that probably accounts for 75% of the data or more and the rest they will scan and drip feed when they can. I have no interest in knowing whats in any of it but I want you to know so we can go back to cool things like ghost stories and big foot and peanutbutter syrup sammiches. Also, I doubt the list will ever be a direct thing but will name people indirectly through financial disclosures to protect against defamation lawsuits and slander and things similar to that. Dont want to feed the criminals more money right?

I think we both know that's not strictly "File size depends on resolution, frame rate, codec, and bitrate."

As to the additional information, safe bet enquiring minds want to know.

And again Trump did promise.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
#23
(09-03-2025, 09:04 AM)andy06shake Wrote: I think we both know that's not strictly "File size depends on resolution, frame rate, codec, and bitrate."

I misspoke, I should of said "a good estimate" instead, because thats truly a good estimate, ill edit it for you
#24
(09-03-2025, 09:06 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: I misspoke, I should of said "a good estimate" instead because thats true, ill edit it for you

Still take your point.

But people still do want to see that information.

Including a significant percentage of Trump's own base.

And they simply won't be happy until they do.

Not providing such only screams complicity imho.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
#25
(09-03-2025, 08:49 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Well, excuses aside, at least we both want to know what's in those additional 284Gb.



You chosen this hill.
You’re certainly watching the live press conference right now with these so called “survivors” right?
Where they been these past 3 decades?
Why aren’t they naming names?
Why did they not come forward sooner.
They would have saved countless other women from being abused and trafficked, right?
I guess you’ll have to do what they suggest and subscribe to their podcasts to get the inside truth.
Do you not see the carnival through the clowns?
#26
I am curious for those who have looked at these files
Do they have dates on them
I am wondering if perhaps there was a push
To find everyone with a degree of connection between Epstein and Trump
And interview them and such
Perhaps uselessly
And fill the files with that
As obfuscation

(Not that Trump doesn't likely have some skeevy stuff on him somewhere)


Edit: Oh wait no
I just realized again
I actually don't care?
#27
(09-03-2025, 09:09 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Still take your point.

But people still do want to see that information.

Including a significant percentage of Trump's own base.

And they simply won't be happy until they do.

Not providing such only screams complicity imho.

Where is a significant portion of Trump's own base gathering to talk about it? 
77,302,580 voted for trump, is there a place where 38 million people are congregating to enraged about the list? I havent seen it yet and im in America. I think the most people ive even seen talk about it are like 10, I havent gone out of my way to look for them all but I guess you found the place so hand it over  Tongue
#28
(09-03-2025, 09:14 AM)Vermilion Wrote: You chosen this hill.
You’re certainly watching the live press conference right now with these so called “survivors” right?
Where they been these past 3 decades?
Why aren’t they naming names?
Why did they not come forward sooner.
They would have saved countless other women from being abused and trafficked, right?
I guess you’ll have to do what they suggest and subscribe to their podcasts to get the inside truth.
Do you not see the carnival through the clowns?

Oh, please, classic deflection 101 as per usual. 

"Where were they for 30 years?" how about in fear, traumatised, and silenced by some very powerful people?

And suggesting survivors had a duty to prevent abuse is disgusting victim-blaming, well done, at least you are consistent as ever.   

"Why no names?" stab in the dark, because naming predators isn't as simple as pointing fingers.

It's legally risky and terrifying for a start.

And telling people to subscribe to podcasts for "truth" is just a weak attempt to gaslight and dismiss decades of documented abuse.

And calling it a "carnival."

Yuck, all you're doing is belittling the survivors while ignoring systemic abuse.

Pathetic really.

And exactly the kind of smokescreen rhetoric meant to protect the guilty and shame the victims.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
#29
(09-03-2025, 09:20 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: Where is a significant portion of Trump's own base gathering to talk about it? 
77,302,580 voted for trump, is there a place where 38 million people are congregating to enraged about the list? I havent seen it yet and im in America. I think the most people ive even seen talk about it are like 10, I havent gone out of my way to look for them all but I guess you found the place so hand it over  Tongue

Just because you don't see millions of people protesting doesn't mean they aren't upset or discussing it privately.

Outrage doesn't always show up as giant marches.

There is no doubt about the fact that some of Trump's own base definitely want the Epstein files released.

Because they see it as exposing corruption among elites.

I think there are probably quite a few Trump supporters here who wish said promises to be performed.

Considering it was sitting on Pam Bondi's desk....and then there miraculously was no list.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
#30
It is good to hear Trump warm the crowd up as RFK gets ready for his big act. Took a while to rebuild as the last administration burnt what they could on their way out. The latest top CDC nutjob getting fired is a good thing too.

On a quick first impression of the Epestein docs, starts around the Maxwell case, thick on the legalize.  Later in the drop gets into some of the situations around some of the victims, drug issues, bad boyfriends. Has been a common tactic to discredit and disregard victims as a junkie prostitute when abused by the establishment, bad in the UK.

Expect there will be a lot more in it. Downloading it, is going to take a while. As for when it comes to naming all the perpetrators that fell into the Epstein trap, are they considered victims of the Intelligence Community?



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Trump and Epstein were great buddies annonentity 1,560 71,941 05-02-2026, 05:39 AM
Last Post: andy06shake
  Epstein Eugenics? Karl12 48 3,437 03-25-2026, 01:48 PM
Last Post: Karl12
  Ghislaine Maxwell friend named in Epstein files found dead by suicide Waterglass 4 525 03-04-2026, 03:06 PM
Last Post: Byrd
  Epstein And The WEF. Karl12 19 873 02-21-2026, 05:44 AM
Last Post: Karl12
  Epstein And 911. Karl12 12 873 02-18-2026, 01:34 PM
Last Post: BeTheGoddess
  The Smoking Gun Epstein Murdered FlyersFan 8 573 02-08-2026, 01:37 PM
Last Post: UltraBudgie
  The True Coverup - Atlantis and the Epstein Files sahgwa 9 955 02-06-2026, 04:33 PM
Last Post: ARM1968
  Clintons Defy Epstein Subpoena, Blame Trump FlyersFan 106 4,898 02-03-2026, 02:55 PM
Last Post: Karl12
  Epstein files prosecutions, anything? Encia22 0 340 02-02-2026, 06:12 PM
Last Post: Encia22
  Epstein’s Membership in the CFR and Trilateral Commission Bob 9 1,321 02-02-2026, 10:21 AM
Last Post: putnam6