3rd shooting in Minnesota.

[David64]

He was put to death, yet the right remains indifferent, celebrating murder while accusing the protesters.

Unlike the Left when it came to Charlie Kirk being murdered, no one is celebrating the man's death. He had every Right to own a gun. If it's legal in his state, he had the Right to carry it...but the second he involved himself in that situation with Federal Agents, all bets are off.

I'm tired of pointing out how stupid it was for him to be involved in that while carrying a gun, so just go back and read the posts.

[cherokeetroy]

Link

[David64]

The numbers of new entrants to the USA are only a trickle in comparison to that number and the USA, provably, has current land and production facilities able to support the ones that have already come, and no doubt, many millions more. As I estimated, based upon Great Britain's current population, when multiplied by the vastly greater land area of the USA, it could support probably 2 billion people. China, with a smaller total land footprint than the USA, currently has a population of about 1.45 billion.

Cool story.

When you going to get rid of those sheep and put in a subdivision ?  Could probably fit a lot of immigrant housing on that.

[ElitePlebeian]

Firstly, you misquoted it. It goes as follows:

"It is not Germany that will turn Bolshevist but Bolshevism that will become a sort of National Socialist. Besides, there is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once...

- Of course, there is no record of Hitler ever having issued such orders it was just him lying, as he frequently did. Anyway, the quote continues:

"The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communist always will.... Our spirit is so strong, and the power of our magnificent movement to transform souls so elemental, that men are remodeled against their will... A social revolution would lend me new, unsuspected powers. I do not fear permeation with revolutionary Communist propaganda".

So what Hitler was allegedly saying was that he believes Communists will loose their principles and will become Nazi's. He wasn't saying that Nazi's were Communists.

The alleged quote was written in Hermann Rauschningin's 1940 book "The Voice of Destruction" (beginning at the end of page 131, and continuing over the page, in its original edition).

Interestingly, Rauschningin went on to emigrate to the USA, from where he strongly denounced both Hitler and the Nazi Party.

If you had read a bit more on the subject, you would know that Hitler said many contradictory things. Where he might have appealed imploringly in one moment, he then became all hard-line and quite aggressively the opposite in the next. And I'm sure that his sycophants fully believed everything he said, even when he contradicted himself.

This is similar to the way Trump says one thing and then, later, totally denies it, even doubling down on obvious lies. Remember when he was all about "releasing the Epstein files" and prosecuting Epstein's partners in crime, and then when it became a real thing and he realized that he was closely implicated, Trump suddenly began saying that there weren't any Epstein files, and the whole thing was a Democrat fraud. Remember that?

Lying dictators are like that.


I have flicked through the book some time ago but I know insufficient about US history to verify that it has any validity. I do know that the Nazi's in Germany were right-wing extremists in ideology, and it is absurd to think that the left in the USA would abandon their ideologies and adopt their extreme opposite ideology.

The book "Liberal Fascism" is a single voice at odds with almost all other historians and political scientists. At least six scholarly reviewers of 'Liberal Fascism' have labelled the book, "poor scholarship", "propaganda", and not scholarly.

Jonah Goldberg, its author, while not retracting the statements he made in the book, has stated in 'The Dispatch'. January 5, 2022:

"there's one important claim that has been rendered utterly wrong. I argued that, contrary to generations of left-wing fearmongering and slander about the right's fascist tendencies, the modern American right was simply immune to the fascist temptation chiefly because it was too dogmatically committed to the Founders, to constitutionalism, and to classical liberalism generally. Almost 13 years to the day after publication, Donald Trump proved me wrong."

Not really a single voice, there a dozens of similar books, writers and researchers who propose information that counters the mainstream narrative that ignores all socialist characteristics to maintain their version of history. Also how do you explain away that many of the NSDAP policy program points were socialist in nature, and they actually implemented many socialist policies that were in line with that party program? Or what about his planned economy? All lies and lipservice somehow?...

[chr0naut]

Cool story.

When you going to get rid of those sheep and put in a subdivision ?  Could probably fit a lot of immigrant housing on that.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...9f0bf5.jpg]

As I explained, I was basing my calculations upon the number of people in Great Britain. I would just like to remind you that despite its population, Great Britain has wildernesses, moors, fens and forests.

13 Truly Wild Places in the UK to Visit This Summer

[Truthhurts]

Unlike the Left when it came to Charlie Kirk being murdered, no one is celebrating the man's death. He had every Right to own a gun. If it's legal in his state, he had the Right to carry it...but the second he involved himself in that situation with Federal Agents, all bets are off.

I'm tired of pointing out how stupid it was for him to be involved in that while carrying a gun, so just go back and read the posts.

He was legally permitted to carry a firearm, and at no point did he draw the gun or aim it at the ICE agents. The weapon posed no threat; in fact, it was irrelevant to the events that unfolded. He never brandished it, nor did he threaten anyone with it; it remained holstered, and an ICE agent was able to seize it without facing any danger—indeed, none of the ICE agents were at risk.

They simply executed him without justification, and if he was obstructing them, they should have handcuffed him and taken him into custody. The initial shot was unnecessary, and even more so were the subsequent nine.

[FlyersFan]

The numbers of new entrants to the USA are only a trickle in comparison to that number and the USA, provably, has current land and production facilities able to support the ones that have already come, and no doubt, many millions more. As I estimated, based upon Great Britain's current population, when multiplied by the vastly greater land area of the USA, it could support probably 2 billion people. China, with a smaller total land footprint than the USA, currently has a population of about 1.45 billion.

STOP.   We already told you we don't want to be an over crowded, polluted mess.   Your dream vision for a massively overpopulated America is disgusting.   Wanting us to be like India.   Landfills everywhere .. cars everywhere .. dwellings overtaking forests .. farmlands disappearing .... and full of foreigners who dont' speak the language and aren't educated and who are poor and suck off the working citizens.    

You'd overwhelm our electrical grid, our sewer systems, our water systems.   We already have times and places that there is water rationing and electrical brown outs.   Not to mention that there aren't jobs enough for 2 billion people here.   You'd collapse our entire system bringing us lower than India. 

We like our forests and wide open spaces and farmlands.  We like not drowning in pollution and landfills.   We like having critters run wild and free in our forests and grasslands.  We like farms growing enough food to feed us and not being bulldozed to put up cheap housing for illegals (or anyone else for that matter).

Just stop.   Just because we have an open space doesn't mean an illegal has to occupy it.  You are a foreigner and your vision for America is not only disgusting, but it goes against the grain of who we are and how we want to live.

[andy06shake]

Other sources say 10 million is a high estimate.

 

Estimates for the pre-Columbian Indigenous population of the Americas vary wildly, from 8 million to over 100 million, with a common scholarly consensus settling around 50-60 million for both continents combined. 

You really want to quibble over how many millions of people's lives were destroyed down to our arrival.

Go right ahead.

The point is, once we arrived, it did not bode well for the indigenous populations.

[andy06shake]

Well. I guess you guys in Europe and England are suppose to make up for it.

I would not know im not in England.

You do realise the UK comprises more than just one country? 

I hope so. LoL

[WallFlowerActive]

Just stop.   Just because we have an open space doesn't mean an illegal has to occupy it.  You are a foreigner and your vision for America is not only disgusting, but it goes against the grain of who we are and how we want to live.