3rd shooting in Minnesota.

[IDELB2006]

Looks like some republicans in Washington are calling for an investigation into the shooting.

 A growing number of Republicans are pressing for a deeper investigation into federal immigration tactics in Minnesota after a U.S. Border Patrol agent fatally shot a man in Minneapolis, a sign that the Trump administration’s accounting of events may face bipartisan scrutiny.
House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Andrew Garbarino sought testimony from leaders at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, saying “my top priority remains keeping Americans safe.”

Between the congressional republicans, Republican governors, and the Minnesota businesses, calling for investigations, and calm, hopefully things begin to settle down.

Link

[Solvedit]

50 million of them or thereabouts when Europe arrived...

Other sources say 10 million is a high estimate.

[Solvedit]

The National Socialist German Workers' Party and the Italian Fascist Party were both far right wing. The left wing parties of the day identified as Communist parties, which were considered by both right-wing parties to be their direct and ideologically opposite parties.

Thank you.

"There is more that unites us to Bolshevism than unites us to it.....I have always made allowances for this, and given orders that former communists are to be admitted to the party at once.  The bourgeois social democrat, the trade unionist will never make a National Socialist, but the communist always will." -Adolf Hitler, 1934.

The left points to the Nazi cooperation with existing corporations but never take into account that most of their profit was confiscated by the state and their output and practices were strictly controlled by regulations and the forced inclusion of a Nazi party representative onto the board of directors.  Just mention corporations and it's the only word some people hear.

Consider reading Liberal Fascism by Goldberg.  Many aspects of their program are definitely from the playbook of the left.

[Vermilion]

“Peaceful protests are part of our democracy, but the key word in that is peaceful. We welcome peaceful protesters. You have every right to express your views.

Let me be very clear about that. If you resist lawful orders, you’re going to jail. If you block an intersection or a roadway, in Brevard County, you’re going to jail.

If you hit one of us, you’re going to the hospital and jail, and most likely get bitten by one of our big, beautiful dogs that we have here.

If you throw a brick, a firebomb, or point a gun at one of our deputies, we will be notifying your family where to collect your remains… because we will kill you, graveyard dead. We’re not going to play.” - Sheriff Wayne Ivey

This is how Florida does it.
Maybe Minnesota should think about it.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QTpculZtm6...FyZCBkZWFk

[quintessentone]

[Sky727]

[ElitePlebeian]

Thank you.

"There is more that unites us to Bolshevism than unites us to it.....I have always made allowances for this, and given orders that former communists are to be admitted to the party at once.  The bourgeois social democrat, the trade unionist will never make a National Socialist, but the communist always will." -Adolf Hitler, 1934.

The left points to the Nazi cooperation with existing corporations but never take into account that most of their profit was confiscated by the state and their output and practices were strictly controlled by regulations and the forced inclusion of a Nazi party representative onto the board of directors.  Just mention corporations and it's the only word some people hear.

Consider reading Liberal Fascism by Goldberg.  Many aspects of their program are definitely from the playbook of the left.

Yes people cant admit they were actually National Socialists, not just in name. I would like to make a thread about it, because there is so much concrete proof of this and still people think they are an example of extreme right politics. And the subject keeps returning.

[Truthhurts]

He was put to death, yet the right remains indifferent, celebrating murder while accusing the protesters. At no time has a protester assaulted any cowardly ICE agent with a weapon, nor have they attempted to kill one. Those on the right who CHERISH the 2nd amendment are happily claiming that this lawful gun owner should not have possessed a firearm; essentially, they believe that only the cowardly right-wing men deserve to be armed,

This website is now overwhelmed with right-wing falsehoods, echo chambers, and repugnant rhetoric, just like ATS was. Well, it was enjoyable while it lasted.

[ElitePlebeian]

[chr0naut]

Thank you.

"There is more that unites us to Bolshevism than unites us to it.....I have always made allowances for this, and given orders that former socialists are to be admitted to the party at once.  The bourgeois social democrat, the trade unionist will never make a National Socialist, but the communist always will." -Adolf Hitler, 1934.

Firstly, you misquoted it. It goes as follows:

"It is not Germany that will turn Bolshevist but Bolshevism that will become a sort of National Socialist. Besides, there is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once...

- Of course, there is no record of Hitler ever having issued such orders it was just him lying, as he frequently did. Anyway, the quote continues:

"The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communist always will.... Our spirit is so strong, and the power of our magnificent movement to transform souls so elemental, that men are remodeled against their will... A social revolution would lend me new, unsuspected powers. I do not fear permeation with revolutionary Communist propaganda".

So what Hitler was allegedly saying was that he believes Communists will loose their principles and will become Nazi's. He wasn't saying that Nazi's were Communists.

The alleged quote was written in Hermann Rauschningin's 1940 book "The Voice of Destruction" (beginning at the end of page 131, and continuing over the page, in its original edition).

Interestingly, Rauschningin went on to emigrate to the USA, from where he strongly denounced both Hitler and the Nazi Party.

If you had read a bit more on the subject, you would know that Hitler said many contradictory things. Where he might have appealed imploringly in one moment, he then became all hard-line and quite aggressively the opposite in the next. And I'm sure that his sycophants fully believed everything he said, even when he contradicted himself.

This is similar to the way Trump says one thing and then, later, totally denies it, even doubling down on obvious lies. Remember when he was all about "releasing the Epstein files" and prosecuting Epstein's partners in crime, and then when it became a real thing and he realized that he was closely implicated, Trump suddenly began saying that there weren't any Epstein files, and the whole thing was a Democrat fraud. Remember that?

Lying dictators are like that.

The left points to the Nazi cooperation with existing corporations but never take into account that most of their profit was confiscated by the state and their output and practices were strictly controlled by regulations and the forced inclusion of a Nazi party representative onto the board of directors.  Just mention corporations and it's the only word some people hear.

Consider reading Liberal Fascism by Goldberg.  Many aspects of their program are definitely from the playbook of the left.

I have flicked through the book some time ago but I know insufficient about US history to verify that it has any validity. I do know that the Nazi's in Germany were right-wing extremists in ideology, and it is absurd to think that the left in the USA would abandon their ideologies and adopt their extreme opposite ideology.

The book "Liberal Fascism" is a single voice at odds with almost all other historians and political scientists. At least six scholarly reviewers of 'Liberal Fascism' have labelled the book, "poor scholarship", "propaganda", and not scholarly.

Jonah Goldberg, its author, while not retracting the statements he made in the book, has stated in 'The Dispatch'. January 5, 2022:

"there's one important claim that has been rendered utterly wrong. I argued that, contrary to generations of left-wing fearmongering and slander about the right's fascist tendencies, the modern American right was simply immune to the fascist temptation chiefly because it was too dogmatically committed to the Founders, to constitutionalism, and to classical liberalism generally. Almost 13 years to the day after publication, Donald Trump proved me wrong."