“VERY STRANGE”: EBOLA OUTBREAK FOLLOWS VACCINE FUNDING

[Toad of Toad Hall]

To be fair, aren’t the companies creating a vaccine for thr strain of Ebola that diesn’t have one yet? obviously an outbreak of that strain would be worse then an outbreak of a treatable strain.

[Thoughtful3]

so i just read through very quickly and haven't noticed anyone draw the conclusion that perhaps, the egg came before the chicken.

yes its true that the region has historically been the epicenter of more than one outbreak.
This lends to the idea that a vaccine has been in the works for a while.
I imagine anyone investing would want some sort of confidence and not just blindly throwing money at the issue. so there may have been some experimental vaccine already in play prior to the funding. 

Perhaps after funding, planning proceeded to further test said vaccine and this outbreak is the result? 
This based on my very small knowledge base on vaccines and their creation but don't they usually use some form of the virus to create them? (and also eggs)
Isn't this what causes most variations/mutations?

I like your thinking. I have harbored the suspicion that the virus and vaccine are developed in tandem.
After all once unleashed they wouldn't want to really catch it, would they?
From all these books it is obvious that they have been working off of a master script. The numbers are key.

I don't believe that any jury would convict any of these players based on numbers alone, although they might need to explain how I can predict the start of the 2025 Ebola outbreak to the day by using their numbers.
And then 8 months later I can predict it again.

I find this most disturbing. Melinda's first book "Moment of Lift" was published April 23, 2019 which just happens to be the 113 day of the year.
Covid plandemic was announced 3/11. Mirror.

Just to give you something to consider because it has me wondering...
Page 299 the last page in Bill Gates recent book "Source Code" -
"About a month later, I crammed what little I owned into my 911, inserted a cassette of THE WAR OF THE WORLDS [his bold]- on loan from Paul- into the tape deck, and headed north through Nevada to Silicon Valley..."

He got 3 speeding tickets along the way which ties into his obsession with #3.


This is the tweet from Billy that really bothers me. I'm still trying to figure it out.

Alien tweet-
https://x.com/BillGates/status/124031961...40/photo/1

March 18 is 7 days after the plandemic was launched.

[chr0naut]

so i just read through very quickly and haven't noticed anyone draw the conclusion that perhaps, the egg came before the chicken.

yes its true that the region has historically been the epicenter of more than one outbreak.
This lends to the idea that a vaccine has been in the works for a while.
I imagine anyone investing would want some sort of confidence and not just blindly throwing money at the issue. so there may have been some experimental vaccine already in play prior to the funding. 

Perhaps after funding, planning proceeded to further test said vaccine and this outbreak is the result? 
This based on my very small knowledge base on vaccines and their creation but don't they usually use some form of the virus to create them? (and also eggs)
Isn't this what causes most variations/mutations?

Mutations happen quite randomly, in both location and time.

The usual suspected method is from a particle or packet of radiation striking the genomic sequence and causing a break in the genomic sequence, or knocking out just an atom, or a few atoms. The molecular bonding forces are then able to pull the sequence back together again, but it now codes for something different as it is missing 'letters' from the instructions. This usually kills (makes non-viable) the pathogen, but sometimes a viable mutation appears instead.

This is the mechanism that causes sunlight exposure to kill viruses. The same sunlight can also cause mutation (an example is that people can get melanomas, a mutation of their epithelial cells, from sunburn. Normally, sunburn kills the cells and the dead skin cells dry and peel, but sometimes a cell becomes cancerous).

Sometimes, chemistry (like that used by viruses, and in genetic manipulation enzymes that are for some reason in the wrong place, at the wrong time) can also snip out or transplant sequences, with the same mutative effect.

In higher orders of life, there are genomic error detection and correction mechanisms that minimize mutation, but in viruses, they are usually too simple to have any such mechanism of their own, and so viruses are more vulnerable to mutation.

Although mutation occurs randomly in any one cell or virus, if you have vast numbers of instances in which to potentially mutate, the likelihood of a mutation rises with population load. By 'population load', I mean the load of numbers of individual viable pathogen units (individual bacteria or virions), times the number of the host organism cells that they infect.

This is why it is vital to mitigate against an epidemic spread of a disease as quickly as possible, or otherwise you will have not only the original strain in large population load to combat, but you will have mutations in large population load which are likely to act differently and may be resistant to natural immune response, immunizations and therapeutics.

As for mutations in the virus during cultivation manufacture of immunizations, it is possible, but not very likely. This is because the source pool population load during manufacture is trillions of times less than that of the source pool population load created in the situation of an epidemic spread. Also, manufactured immunizations are kept chemically pure and radiation shielded, so mutating factors are almost non-existent.

With mRNA and genomic methods of immunization manufacture, the chances of a mutation to the strain is even less than in the older methods of cultivation to produce immunization components.

[chr0naut]

I am very skeptical of the bat connection. Just my take on it but there was an Ebola vaccine campaign that was launched on September 14, 2025. Phoebe Gates birthday.

https://www.afro.who.int/countries/democ...blic-congo 

What if the vaccine was the method of delivery? At this point nothing would surprise me since these people are crazy. Good method to transmit imho. So how long has this been circulating and was reporting tamped down until a specific date?

May 17, 2026.
https://www.who.int/news/item/17-05-2026...al-concern

If people were injected with Ebola, they would all fall life-threateningly unwell within two to six days. It would be obvious of the source because it is a hemorrhagic disease which would visibly spread from the intramuscular injection site.

[Thoughtful3]

To be fair, aren’t the companies creating a vaccine for thr strain of Ebola that diesn’t have one yet? obviously an outbreak of that strain would be worse then an outbreak of a treatable strain.

One should proceed with caution with any mRNA jab that Moderna is intent on bringing to market. remember their stock price was tanking until this novel strain of Ebola appeared and now has had new life breathed into it.

There is something more insidious going on.

 


The WHO has recommended Remdesivir as a clinical trial drug for treating the B. Ebola, fondly known as Run Death Is Near.

Did they not learn anything from the 2014- 2016 Ebola outbreak where it was pulled because it killed more people than Ebola itself?

I've covered this before but we should look at it again.
RFK Jr's book [ heavily sourced] has a chapter about Remdesivir.
I'm going to break this down for easier reading. Of course it is going to have a real conspiracy twist to it.

[Thoughtful3]

"The Real Anthony Fauci" Page 63. Remdesivir.

Line 26- "After the Zika threat vanished, NIAID put some $6.9 million into identifying a new pandemic against which to deploy Remdesivir. In 2018, Gilead entered Remdesivir in a NIAID-funded clinical trial against Ebola in Africa." Line 26 and we just happen to have this in 2026.

69

Billy the Gates book "How to Prevent a Climate Crisis" has a line on the top of page 69 and "Source Code" has a line on the top of pages 6 & 9.

"However, 6 months into the Ebola study, the trial's Safety Review Board suddenly pulled both Remdesivir and ZMapp from the trial. Remdesivir, it turned out, was hideously dangerous."

We have Billy's calling card #28.

"Within 28 days, subjects taking remdesivir had lethal side effects including multiple organ failure, acute kidney failure, septic shock, and hypotension, and 54% of the Remdesivir group died- the highest mortality rate among the 4 experimental drugs.. Anthony Fauci's drug, ZMapp, ran up the second- highest body count at 44%."

Here's where Billy fits in.

NIAID and the CDC spent $79 million developing the drug for Gilead, and the B & M Gates foundation had a sizeable investment of $6.5 million in the company. Another great investment made by Billy, although this pales with the best investment he ever made in BioNTech- where he cashed out at the stock price high.

It certainly helped that Fauci made it the standard of care during Covid.

[Thoughtful3]

Since the NIAID, under Fauci, had sponsored the clinical trials, he was fully aware of the horrible results.

"NIAID was the primary funder of this study, and its researchers published the bad news about Remdesivir in the New England Journal of Medicine in December 2019."

Footnotes #13 & 14.
Page 111 [#13]- Sabue Mulango, "A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics, New England Journal of Medicine [December 12, 2019] https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1910993

[#14]-  Ibid at Table 2. Comparison of Death at 28 Days According to Treatment Group.

Despite knowing the results Fauci declared on February 25, 2020 that they were going to enroll hospitalized patients in a clinical trial using Remdesivir. Why that date

3 days remaining in February and 11 days until the Covid plandemic was officially launched.

[3.11] Amazing that Fauci could be so accurate, almost like he knew something. At this time there were only 14 confirmed cases of Covid in the U.S- most coming from the Diamond Princess cruise ship.

[Thoughtful3]

The burning question is why did Fauci resort to this so called therapeutic?
Albert Bourla makes it clear that all the Big Pharma reps that attended the first meeting of OWS were leaning towards therapeutics rather than jabs. The jabs strategy really didn't make sense.
Everything changed once Bourla's representative, Mikael Dolsten, attended in his place and steered the group towards vaccines. Dolsten reported to Bourla that Fauci became very excited when the vaccine topic was brought up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikael_Dolsten

According to Kennedy this was a matter of optics, they couldn't just go with vaccines because people would have questioned that.

It would not compete with vaccines because it could only be used on those that were seriously ill and had to be given by IV, plus it was expensive, very expensive- $3,000 for treatment. A bonanza for Gates and Gilead, probably the NIH who probably still had patents. It cost Gilead $10 per treatment.

"By granting EUA, regulators could force private insurers, Medicare, and Medicaid to fork over $3,000 per treatment..."

This is weird-
Fauci paid Ralph Baric, the gain-of-function guru, $6 million to accelerate Remdesivir as a Coronavirus remedy at Wuhan in 2017. 

Early March 2020, the Gates foundation bankrolled $125 million of tax deducatable grants to support drug makers to develop coronavirus treatments. Gates and/ or his foundation had large equity stakes in many of the pharmaceutical companies that received these funds- including gilead."

"April 24, 2020, Gilead's voluntary spokesman Bill Gates declared: "for the novel coronavirus, the leading drug candidate in this category is Remdesivir from Gilead."

His dates always have meaning. I'm checking my "All things April chart"-

https://www.who.int/news/item/24-04-2026...ccinations

[Thoughtful3]

Page 65-

"Fauci's researchers used no placebo in the more severely ailing patients  and gave the remaining patients an active comparator containing the same treatment protocol agents as used in the Remdesivir arm except for substituting sulfobutyl for Remdesivir as the test agent."

"Utilization of so-called "toxic" or "spiked" placebos- also known as "Fauxcebos"- is a fraudulent gimmick that Fauci and his drug researchers have pioneered over 40 years to conceal to conceal adverse side effects of toxic drugs for which they seek approval."

All of this is so messedup-
Thee was no way that they could demonstrate that Remdesivir had any positive benefit.
"wile fewer patients receiving Remdesivir died, those receiving it were also a lot less sick than the placebo subjects when they entered the trial."

If we think this is bad-
"Cliff Lane, Fauci's deputy chaired the NIH Treatment Guidelines panel but he also personally oversaw the Remdesivir trials in China, and stood, potentially, to share in patent rewards and royalties for the drug." Page 66.

Big problems with China. Here they were observing the devastating effect of Remdesivir on Covid ill patients. 
"Fauci learned that the Lancet had just published a placebo-controlled Chinese study that showed Remdesivir utterly ineffective at keeping hospitalized patients alive OR  reducing the duration of hospitalization.

Even more importantly, Remdesivir did not reduce the presence of the virus in the blood. Worst of all, the Chinese study confirmed Remdesivir's deadly toxicity. The Chinese regulators and researchers shuttered the that trial because of potentially lethal side effects. Remdesivir caused serious injury in 12% of the patients, compared to 5% of patients in the placebo group."

Fauci just glossed over this and while with Trump he made the absurd claim that it reduced the median time of hospitalization to 11 days and 15 days for the placebo group.


May 1 the FDA gave EUA.
"Fauci sponsored the clinical trial whose detailed results were not subject to peer review he demanded for drugs like he regarded as rivals, like hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin." [Vera Sharav].

Interesting comment by Billy "Sadly the trials in the U.S. have been so chaotic that the actual proven effect is kind  of small. Potentially the effect is much larger than that. It's insane how confused the trials here in the U.S. have been."

October 19, 2020 The WHO [ 3 days before Remdesivir's approval] released the results of their massive study-  "Remdesivir failed to reduce mortality, and failed to reduce the need for ventilation OR the length of hospital stays. WHO researchers found no detectable benefits from Remdesivir and recommended against its use in Covid-19 patients. WHO published its devastating indictment of Remdesivir 1 month after the FDA issued the Remdesivir EUA for children less than 12 years of age. Fauci and the FDA knew about the WHO study before the FDA issued the EUA for Remedesivir..." 

"How many of these American were Remdesivir deaths?"

There was only one other country that used Remdesivir- Brazil- and it had the second highest death rate after the U.s.

[Thoughtful3]

If people were injected with Ebola, they would all fall life-threateningly unwell within two to six days. It would be obvious of the source because it is a hemorrhagic disease which would visibly spread from the intramuscular injection site.

Just my observation but there were different lots of Covid-19 vaccines. Some were hot and some were in the middle and some were just saline. Obviously if one is going to cause harm one wouldn't want it happening all at the same time. One would want to slow roll it out to an unsuspecting public.

The Dr Congo does not have a strong health system, no thanks to Bill Gates and friends, and I suspect that the data collection on illness and death attributed to Ebola is inaccurate at best. Who knows where they pull the numbers from. In fact they aren't really certain when the first cases occured.

And those that control the data control the narrative. 

https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/...A98-/A98.4

All the same players again.


https://www.devex.com/news/eu-singapore-...eak-112536



https://x.com/CEPIvaccines/status/206038...gr%5Etweet

9:25 A.M May 29, 2026. Probably just a wild coincidence that 9/26 was the last confirmed Ebola case in 2025.

https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-...025-DON589