Second 'Secret City' Found Beneath Giza Pyramids?

[Harte]

From the article:

"It’s widely accepted that the only way to prove the existence of the pillars is for targeted digs to take place underneath the pyramids.'

They don't need to do any digs. There are tons of access points that the Egyptian antiquities have blocked off. They know what's. down there. They don't want it to be known as it would change history and many peoples world view.

No access has been blocked at all.
They don't let crowds go down there and discard their HoHo wrappers though, and you have to pre-arrange for a tour.
There are multiple videos on Youtube featuring tourists who did exactly that.
You can't blame Egypt for your own ignorance.

Harte

[BeyondKnowledge]

They are using that same seismic radar tomogrophy which uses nothing but seismic vibrations to paint blurry pictures based on vibrational densities.  I think the same way the first 'find' was too vague to be confirmed as a structure, let alone a city, also paints this in a very poor light.

The technology is not made for finding solid structures underground.

 
RADAR was never made to find things in the ground until it was. SONAR was never made to look at the organs in a person's body until it was. Man was not ment to fly until they did. The Internet was not built for sharing cat videos until it was.

Much like all technologies, the early stages are not clear because they haven't learned how to fully apply  them yet. Could be a breakthrough or could be a glitch in the software. It is very much worth looking into proving one way or another though.

[KKLoco]

No access has been blocked at all.
They don't let crowds go down there and discard their HoHo wrappers though, and you have to pre-arrange for a tour.
There are multiple videos on Youtube featuring tourists who did exactly that.
You can't blame Egypt for your own ignorance.

Harte

The access points to the labyrinth have been blocked. Are you aware of the Giza Plateau's original name? It was called 'Rostau'. Which means 'Mouth of the passages', or 'Doorway to the underworld'. 

I'm not saying what these researches are saying is down there, is true. I AM saying that there is a labyrinth down there. And there is no doubt the Egyptian government has blocked it from public view.

[sahgwa]

 
RADAR was never made to find things in the ground until it was. SONAR was never made to look at the organs in a person's body until it was. Man was not ment to fly until they did. The Internet was not built for sharing cat videos until it was.

Much like all technologies, the early stages are not clear because they haven't learned how to fully apply  them yet. Could be a breakthrough or could be a glitch in the software. It is very much worth looking into proving one way or another though.

Oh I agree 100% that it is worth looking into.

But I don't agree at all with these grandiose claims and fantastic images that have been created on the basis of smudgy pings.

[Harte]

The access points to the labyrinth have been blocked. Are you aware of the Giza Plateau's original name? It was called 'Rostau'. Which means 'Mouth of the passages', or 'Doorway to the underworld'. 

I'm not saying what these researches are saying is down there, is true. I AM saying that there is a labyrinth down there. And there is no doubt the Egyptian government has blocked it from public view.

The supposed labyrinth is nowhere near Giza. Why do you change the subject?
Besides, the "labyrinth" has never been excavated. Do you think Egypt is hiding something by not allowing Billy Bob and his pals to go there with shovels and gunny sacks?

Harte

[Harte]

The access points to the labyrinth have been blocked. Are you aware of the Giza Plateau's original name? It was called 'Rostau'. Which means 'Mouth of the passages', or 'Doorway to the underworld'. 

You are SEVERELY misinformed.
Rostau was a particular region of the afterlife. Giza, being a gigantic cemetery, it's not surprising to have it referred to as the entrance to the underworld. I mean, that's the point of a cemetery, isn't it.

Harte

[Wild Bill]

21 years ago I was reading about these underground cities in Nexus magazine 

https://www.scribd.com/document/84315576...azine-2004

http://www.ancient-wisdom.com/gizaunderground.htm

30 metres from the north face of the GP is Campbell tomb ( map room )   , I recall thinking how I would get so many meters of abseiling rope for the 3 drops 700 ft ? .

round and round we go

[Byrd]

From MSN source on page 1.

"Filippo Biondi, co-author of the research, told MailOnline their data shows a 90% probability that the Menkaure shares the same pillars as Khafre. "

So, Biondi is not an archaeologist:

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/author/37085368207

And what exactly is this 'special' algorithm he uses to read his data (?)

I think we need Biondi and his colleagues to have a debate with archaeologists.

I think the likely scenario is that his algorithm is flawed, and this proves it.  

Moreover, I would bet that his methods can't find Kentucky's Mammoth Cave... or any of the other larger known limestone cave structures in the world.  I chose limestone because the Giza plateau is limestone.  If the algorithm were valid, then it should be able to map out most of Mammoth Cave (which has huge underground rooms) and Carlsbad Caverns (ditto) and many other caves, including areas that are known to be there but are a bit too small for someone to enter.

I don't think he can do that.

Seriously.  That would be the quickest way to prove his algorithm.

[pianopraze]

I think the likely scenario is that his algorithm is flawed, and this proves it.  

Moreover, I would bet that his methods can't find Kentucky's Mammoth Cave... or any of the other larger known limestone cave structures in the world.  I chose limestone because the Giza plateau is limestone.  If the algorithm were valid, then it should be able to map out most of Mammoth Cave (which has huge underground rooms) and Carlsbad Caverns (ditto) and many other caves, including areas that are known to be there but are a bit too small for someone to enter.

I don't think he can do that.

Seriously.  That would be the quickest way to prove his algorithm.

Interesting theory, would like to see this tried 100%.

But the cave is a void, not a structure, so can the technology sense voids? I think there is tech for that. Not sure it is the tech they are using.

I think they are claiming to see structures presumably different material from native soil?

so that would make it apples to oranges? Maybe better would be to test this on known underground structures, preferably through same material… sand in this case. Are there known underground structures they could scan? Especially in Egypt? Would love to see the data from that.

too many questions not enough answers.

[Byrd]

Interesting theory, would like to see this tried 100%.

But the cave is a void, not a structure, so can the technology sense voids? I think there is tech for that. Not sure it is the tech they are using.

I think they are claiming to see structures presumably different material from native soil?

so that would make it apples to oranges? Maybe better would be to test this on known underground structures, preferably through same material… sand in this case. Are there known underground structures they could scan? Especially in Egypt? Would love to see the data from that.

too many questions not enough answers.

The tunnels are voids.

He's saying he can detect spaces (voids) up to 5km underground (according to some things I've seen).  He supposedly showed an underground lab that's known...but I had some questions about the image, and I'm not sure he really did see this.

It really is apples to apples.