06-13-2024, 04:25 AM
(06-12-2024, 11:51 PM)jaded Wrote: The IC community has to be thrilled beyond belief!!
If their job on this current op was to gradually promote disinfo, mistrust, confusion and apathy then yes I'm sure they're well chuffed.
Countless CIA operatives (including MKUltra) involved in the TTSA/AARO fiasco; mockingbird media saturation and Non-Official Covers acting as controlled opposition - classic stuff.
Don't usually have any time for Bragalia but thought he made a good point here about Kirkpatrick (as did Rennenkampff on Kirkpatrick's absolute dishonesty on the largest scientific UFO study ever conducted).
It's almost as if these people are physically unable to tell the truth lol.
Quote:It also notes that Kirkpatrick was a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) asset from 2005-2010.
Kirkpatrick likely holds the highest security clearances obtainable. He began his career in Defense and Intelligence-related science and technology immediately out of graduate school. He is the very definition of a “science spook”. He is a technical intelligence operative that is schooled in disinformation, misinformation, and misdirection. He has cultivated an air of dismissiveness about UFOs/UAPs. This is shown in the AARO public report on the phenomena issued under Kirkpatrick that was roundly criticized for its misrepresentations and omissions of data, cases, and sightings. These misrepresentations are no doubt purposeful, and Kirkpatrick, given his background, is skilled at shaping information.
As noted in a March 15 piece by Marik von Rennenkampff on “The Hill” website, speaking about the March 8th congressionally-mandated AARO historical review of US government involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (and specifically about Kirkpatrick’s assessment of the Battelle UFO study results):
“AARO’s review misrepresents the most exhaustive, comprehensive historical analysis of UFO incidents, conducted on behalf of the Air Force by the Battelle Memorial Institute in the early 1950s. According to AARO, the resulting report found that “all cases that had enough data were resolved and explainable. But this is not what Battelle’s analysis found at all, and AARO’s misrepresentation of its conclusions speaks volumes. According to the Battelle analysis, as the quality of UFO reports improved, so too did the number with “unknown” explanations. Of the UFO cases considered “Excellent” and with sufficient data to draw a conclusion, 33 percent were categorized as having “unknown” origin.”
Kirkpatrick is at best being disingenuous when characterizing the Battelle study. At worst, he is purposely lying about the meaning of the results in order to minimize their importance and for other ulterior reasons.
