06-06-2024, 04:38 PM
(06-06-2024, 11:56 AM)Maxmars Wrote: Fauci, and a handful of others, were repeatedly alerted to how dangerous others in their industry deemed their then "plans" to engage in this effort to "see what would happen in they made an animal virus more infectious to humans." The email exchanges, and discussions about the idea circulated before 2015. Some researchers were adamant, this is too tricky to be screwing around with. Anything that could go wrong would go wrong spectacularly and people could end up suffering all over the world.
Interestingly, when your in charge of "doling out research grant money" you get to "shush" people up...
You know who desperately focused on this gain of function-"like" research... stuck to it like a bulldog with a toy... wouldn't ever "let it go?" Fauci. With his wife manning the bioethics arm of the organization... he was in like Flynt. Insert the O'Jays... "Money money money."
A trillion dollars shifted later, economies crushed, global dominion over everyone at the precipice, lives shattered and dreams murdered... hooray for Big Pharma and the Bank Cartel!... they "succeeded" /sarc
Speaking of Fauci, and even though it's off topic, it's a very good idea to see what other scientists had to say about him and his research back in the 80s in the AIDS era. Prominent scientists like Dr Peter Duesberg and Dr Karry Mullis who was awarded the Novel Prize for the discovery of PCR, had very different ideas about what science is and whether Fauci should be in the position he was even back then. The same position he hold forever.
Dr Duesberg is very famous for discovering I think the first oncogene. Both him and Mullis were under attacks by the system because they couldn't agree with 'the science' back in the 80s and the official narratives.
