03-16-2025, 05:36 AM
This post was last modified 03-16-2025, 06:35 AM by putnam6. Edited 5 times in total. 
What the hell does that even mean ? "Ukraine peacekeeper deployment is now operational"
Let's hope this works... somehow
It all sounds a bit fractured, sounds like we will just slip the tip in?
"insisted on US involvement"
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/POql6zsXZbmcE/giphy.gif)
it should have been announced as a solid coalition of British, French, Turkey, etc. peacekeepers. Even with this small group, Putin will no doubt be having discussions in the back channels.
Likely picking them off one by one diplomatically
But we will see
Geopoliti?
@DalioTroy
·
16h
British PM Starmer announced Ukraine peacekeeper deployment is now operational. He slammed Putin’s ceasefire as inadequate and insisted on US involvement. European military leaders will meet in Britain Thursday. Critics warn this risks pushing Europe toward WW3.
Honestly I can’t wait to see the first guys getting deployed in Ukraine… Putin's response to ceasefire 'not good enough'. Military chiefs to meet in Britain on Thursday: plans to send peacekeepers to Ukraine move into 'operational phase' - British PM Starmer.
Emmanuel Macron said Russia will have no say over whether foreign troops will be sent to Ukraine to guarantee an eventual ceasefire.
“If Ukraine asks allied forces to be on its territory, it is not up to Russia to accept or not,” the French president told local press last night before another aerial attacks between Russia and Ukraine.
France and Britain, as well as other Nato countries including Turkey, have said they are willing to send peacekeeping troops to a post-war Ukraine.
Moscow has repeatedly said it will reject any proposals for foreign troops to be stationed in Ukraine.
It comes after Keir Starmer hosted a virtual meeting of the “coalition of the willing” on Saturday, which involved 26 nations, including Ukraine, to rally support behind Kyiv and discuss steps to end the war.
![[Image: GmFfG_gX0AAJemu?format=jpg&name=small]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GmFfG_gX0AAJemu?format=jpg&name=small)
Then we get the plethora of comments here's the link to the thread
https://x.com/Zlatti_71/status/1900905097300779099
max bucket
@maxbucket
This feels more like 1939 BEF than 1944 D-Day
matt
@matt20910978653
Correct. Only the UN can sanction peacekeepers and Russia has a veto on that. Even if there's a ceasefire, a precondition would be no peacekeepers too. Macron and starmer just trying to raise their dismal ratings.
![[Image: O6ODbkWc_normal.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1786143108293357568/O6ODbkWc_normal.jpg)
We are living in dangerous times. God and Country
@b94311827
Will America fight if UK gets a pounding inside Ukraine by the Russians? Treaty obligations say 100% they will. How does Trump avoid it?.
TommyBomberdill
@t_bomberdill
These world leadersbin europe are the dumbest in history! The war started to prevent nato military in ukraine, so the solution is to put nato troops in ukraine? Beyind stupid. These globalists are determined to have ww3
Brig V Mahalingam
@BrigMahalingam
What does Starmer mean by saying “plans to send peacekeepers to Ukraine move into 'operational phase' “ He is trying to confuse the world. Let me make a clear statement: Britain’s economy is not in a state either to take up arms in support of Ukraine or support Ukraine
2.7K
Rarely Tolerable.
@RarelyTolerated
Zelensky says he needs nuclear weapons or Nato membership to keep Russia from attacking the west. Would you support giving nuclear weapons back to Ukraine?
Let's hope this works... somehow
It all sounds a bit fractured, sounds like we will just slip the tip in?
"insisted on US involvement"
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/POql6zsXZbmcE/giphy.gif)
it should have been announced as a solid coalition of British, French, Turkey, etc. peacekeepers. Even with this small group, Putin will no doubt be having discussions in the back channels.
Likely picking them off one by one diplomatically
But we will see
Geopoliti?
@DalioTroy
·
16h
British PM Starmer announced Ukraine peacekeeper deployment is now operational. He slammed Putin’s ceasefire as inadequate and insisted on US involvement. European military leaders will meet in Britain Thursday. Critics warn this risks pushing Europe toward WW3.
Honestly I can’t wait to see the first guys getting deployed in Ukraine… Putin's response to ceasefire 'not good enough'. Military chiefs to meet in Britain on Thursday: plans to send peacekeepers to Ukraine move into 'operational phase' - British PM Starmer.
Emmanuel Macron said Russia will have no say over whether foreign troops will be sent to Ukraine to guarantee an eventual ceasefire.
“If Ukraine asks allied forces to be on its territory, it is not up to Russia to accept or not,” the French president told local press last night before another aerial attacks between Russia and Ukraine.
France and Britain, as well as other Nato countries including Turkey, have said they are willing to send peacekeeping troops to a post-war Ukraine.
Moscow has repeatedly said it will reject any proposals for foreign troops to be stationed in Ukraine.
It comes after Keir Starmer hosted a virtual meeting of the “coalition of the willing” on Saturday, which involved 26 nations, including Ukraine, to rally support behind Kyiv and discuss steps to end the war.
Then we get the plethora of comments here's the link to the thread
https://x.com/Zlatti_71/status/1900905097300779099
max bucket
@maxbucket
This feels more like 1939 BEF than 1944 D-Day
matt
@matt20910978653
Correct. Only the UN can sanction peacekeepers and Russia has a veto on that. Even if there's a ceasefire, a precondition would be no peacekeepers too. Macron and starmer just trying to raise their dismal ratings.
![[Image: O6ODbkWc_normal.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1786143108293357568/O6ODbkWc_normal.jpg)
We are living in dangerous times. God and Country
@b94311827
Will America fight if UK gets a pounding inside Ukraine by the Russians? Treaty obligations say 100% they will. How does Trump avoid it?.
TommyBomberdill
@t_bomberdill
These world leadersbin europe are the dumbest in history! The war started to prevent nato military in ukraine, so the solution is to put nato troops in ukraine? Beyind stupid. These globalists are determined to have ww3
![[Image: hIb71v7y_normal.jpeg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/509178194675523584/hIb71v7y_normal.jpeg)
@BrigMahalingam
What does Starmer mean by saying “plans to send peacekeepers to Ukraine move into 'operational phase' “ He is trying to confuse the world. Let me make a clear statement: Britain’s economy is not in a state either to take up arms in support of Ukraine or support Ukraine
2.7K
![[Image: qtKxoyVt_normal.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1892316685845078016/qtKxoyVt_normal.jpg)
@RarelyTolerated
Zelensky says he needs nuclear weapons or Nato membership to keep Russia from attacking the west. Would you support giving nuclear weapons back to Ukraine?
- Yes
30.1%
- No
69.9%
His mind was not for rent to any god or government, always hopeful yet discontent. Knows changes aren't permanent, but change is ....
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart