Trump shot?

[ArMaP]

One thing I have noticed is that the longer after an event happens, the less reliable the information coming out is. It takes time to develop a cover story and fabricate "evidence." Initial information may be sketchy and fluid, but at least it is what people on the scene believe to be true and usually has some truth in it.

Only when things are pre-planed and go according to plan, as in those cases the cover story was already prepared along with the "evidence", so too much evidence right at the start is, to me, even more suspicious.

---

Some things I do not agree with:

2.) The shooter was not alone at the rally. No accomplices, he just wasn't at the rally by himself. He was with a group of peers. (There's proof)

The audio of a woman calling (supposedly) his name is not proof that he was not alone, is only proof (if real, it's extremely easy to add sound to a video) that someone on the rally knew him or someone else with that name.
 

5.) He had been radicalized by some group over the past couple years.

A desperate act does not mean radicalization, and the US history is full of cases of people that decide to kill someone (or many people) because of some personal idea, like "I don't like Mondays".