Joe Rogan saying both Harris and Trump coming on show

[Snarky412]

That’s third thread… this one being first. I have the video linked earlier.

it was exceptional interview.

i really hope he can get Kamala to stop whatever stonewalling she’s doing and actually go on JRE.

But, but, but...

She will need 3 hours of prepared questions given to her beforehand to study. 

Just saying....that seems to be her modus operandi for interviews, otherwise they are cut short. 

[pianopraze]

And when Brett Baier had asked her during his interview (what a joke she was, showing up late/leaving early/blaming Trump even tho he wasn't the one in office for the past 3.5yrs), he asked what she would do differently and she responded nothing comes to mind.

Like, seriously? She couldn't have at least tried to sound intelligent?!?

I can just hear her telling the P.M of Japan, "nothing comes to mind" or any foreign leader for that matter when asked a serious question. 

Don't u know that they (foreign leaders) will not respect her as much after watching her these past few weeks? smdh

Rogan asked all the same type question on this interview.

what did you do poorly, what would you do different. You really messed up hiring people.

Trump calmly admitted fault. Answered all the questions.

leftist claimed the questions were ambush interview to Kamala but these same questions were softballs to Trump.

*facepalm*

[Maxmars]

Rogan asked all the same type question on this interview.
what did you do poorly, what would you do different. You really messed up hiring people.
Trump calmly admitted fault. Answered all the questions.
leftist claimed the questions were ambush interview to Kamala but these same questions were softballs to Trump.
*facepalm*

Apparently the Harris party has convinced itself (and everyone else they can) that it's not really counter-intuitive to 'pretend' that their "committee-selected" candidate is somehow "oppressed" and "victimized" by being characterized as not being able to ever provide a substantive answer to any question whatsoever.  And yet, when asked, the candidate never does really answer... not even "kind of."  It's kind of "in your face" at this point.

They've run an almost totally Trump-focused campaign... and their voters aren't ever supposed to wonder why that is. 
Why not run a Harris-focused campaign?  Voters aren't "supposed" to wonder about that either.

They posture that every utterance of their opponent is a low-blow personal smear against a "woman of color", a proclamation of white supremacy, a call-back to the glory of "Hitler", and they stop short of saying "proof of the end times" only because they don't ever want to express the value of religious spirituality or tradition... 

I'm kind of sorry that someone has managed to deface and debase the process so completely, that people cannot even discuss politics anymore... but that's only because all they ever think to talk about now is political celebrities... not actual politics, or even meaningful political issues.

I wish that I could have a say in the exact wording of questions Rogan might choose when interviewing Harris...  It would be very unforgiving of the 'one-trick dance' she seems perpetually to perform when speaking publicly.  I would like to hear a single genuine unrehearsed, un-indoctrinated/scripted response form her... I pray that Rogan get his chance, and that he doesn't get tricked into the "dance" with her.   I actually respect the idea of wanting to have "conversation" with the candidates... not some bullshit 'make-believe debate' parody.

[not Network Dude]

I highly doubt that we might see either guest... certainly not unless Mr. Rogan decides formally to "endorse" one or the other.

I'm sure a Trump interview will be difficult, if not impossible to "manage," his expository style might just not be a fit for Rogan's interview style... 
And as for Harris... it would be out of character for her to ever to be allowed to speak for more than a few minutes at a time... and Rogan would have to "shepherd" her incessantly, as her persona seems incapable of actually answering a question without superfluous flummery... something that Rogan would either have to challenge or risk losing a large chunk of his audience.

"Presidential" candidates do interviews for a reason... they are always "selling" something.

I don't think that's really 'built-in' to Rogan's platform. 

But hey, I could be wrong.

Not saying you are wrong, but Trump did a good interview with Joe Rogan.  About 3 hours.  He rambled a good bit, but sounded just like Trump.  It's looking like Harris won't be doing the same.  Joe doesn't offer teleprompters.

[pianopraze]

I actually respect the idea of wanting to have "conversation" with the candidates... not some bullshit 'make-believe debate' parody.

Rogan said in air yesterday exactly this. He wants to have conversation with her and they have not said no. They’ve not said yes yet either…

Video of Rogan saying this on Twitter.

[pianopraze]

Not the bee Link

People think Google is censoring Joe Rogan's interview of Donald Trump on YouTube. Look at the search results for yourself.

I tried it and the show did not come up.

there were a lot of clips from msnbc etc saying how bad Trump did, but the show itself was not in the results.

[Lynyrd Skynyrd]

Elon Musk retweeted this issue. The full, unedited Rogan/Trump podcast won't come up.in a YouTube search. It seems that Alphabet wants to control what people can see.

[UltraBudgie]

I am just posting in this thread so the Speedo thread will not be at the top of the Most Active Thread list.

And, to contribute, I was thinking of posting here yesterday that I tried to replicate the YouTube search results assertion, but was unable to. I opened a new "private browsing" (ha!) window, went to YouTube, and searched for "Joe Rogan Donald Trump". His video interview was at the top of the list. Now, of course YouTube probably customizes its search results based on all kinds of criteria, and this "proves" nothing, but take it as you will.

Perhaps I'll actually watch the interview in a few months or years, after the election. I suspect I will find it much more edifying and substantive that way. See what's aged well and what hasn't.

[FlyersFan]

JOE ROGAN SAYS ....

According to Joe Rogan ... Trump agreed to the three hour interview and no restrictions ...  But Kamala was insisting on one hour only.   Rogan said it takes the three hour interview to get into having a conversation to get to know the person.  Kamala wanted just the one hour.  That's probably as long as her rehearsed platitudes would last.  She's avoiding the real conversation ....

[pianopraze]

I am just posting in this thread so the Speedo thread will not be at the top of the Most Active Thread list.

And, to contribute, I was thinking of posting here yesterday that I tried to replicate the YouTube search results assertion, but was unable to. I opened a new "private browsing" (ha!) window, went to YouTube, and searched for "Joe Rogan Donald Trump". His video interview was at the top of the list. Now, of course YouTube probably customizes its search results based on all kinds of criteria, and this "proves" nothing, but take it as you will.

Perhaps I'll actually watch the interview in a few months or years, after the election. I suspect I will find it much more edifying and substantive that way. See what's aged well and what hasn't.

After they got caught they added it back. Now trying to community note it was a lie. But it wasn’t. They deleted it from search until millions saw it and started laughing at google on twitter.

UPDATE;

kamala said she would due interview Tuesday but only for one hour, and she would not goto Rogans studio - he would have to fly to her.

he wisely refused but is apparently still in talks.