+- Deny Ignorance (https://denyignorance.com)
+-- Forum: Current Events (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Current-Events)
+--- Forum: Current Events (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Current-Events--20)
+--- Thread: At current rates of migration (/Thread-At-current-rates-of-migration)
RE: At current rates of migration - CoyoteAngels - 01-22-2024
(01-20-2024, 01:49 PM)putnam6 Wrote: The problem with aid America already sends lots of aid to Central and South America, but it no doubt gets siphoned off sold on the black market, and is poorly distributed. These countries don't care if the migrants leave either.
Yes we shouldn't have to pay to keep them there, but it's better than paying for and keeping them here undocumented, little chance to succeed and a strain on our economy.
It's why we need a waypoint in between, hell anything to take some of the pressure off at the border. You build a camp for 25,000-50,000 and see how it goes. Has to be better than what is happening now.
25-50k will fill up in a few weeks. What is better is deport in mass and the rest quit coming. They don't leave unless they believe they will be successful. They will call others on their cell phones and say 'dont come!'
Why is this a difficult proposition to understand.
RE: At current rates of migration - worldstarcountry - 01-22-2024
(01-10-2024, 02:27 PM)putnam6 Wrote:That is a noble concept, but they will just settle in Pre-America and it will become a Gaza or basically like every slum outside of foreign major metro areas.
I prefer a no man's land where no human is authorized to enter. It will consist of every square mile between legal ports of entry.
RE: At current rates of migration - putnam6 - 01-23-2024
(01-22-2024, 07:20 PM)CoyoteAngels Wrote: 25-50k will fill up in a few weeks. What is better is deport in mass and the rest quit coming. They don't leave unless they believe they will be successful. They will call others on their cell phones and say 'dont come!'
Why is this a difficult proposition to understand.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/11/26/3-times-previous-presidents-closed-the-southern-border/
Because in the 59 years of my life, the border has been shut down 3 times and even then it was only a few weeks and months. I'd love to win the lottery but that ain't likely to happen either, so the next best thing try and stem the flood, create and alternative. Come up with a compromise because these half measures bull---- isn't working
(01-22-2024, 11:51 PM)worldstarcountry Wrote: That is a noble concept, but they will just settle in Pre-America and it will become a Gaza or basically like every slum outside of foreign major metro areas.
I prefer a no man's land where no human is authorized to enter. It will consist of every square mile between legal ports of entry.
Well #1 If and when it does thats when you tell the azzhats this is why you don't let them in the country in the first place
as for you no man's plan that shit would be unenforceable, incredibly expensive, LOL a mile around every port of entry. You know how much population lives within a mile of the border.
https://www.southernborder.org/border_lens_southern_border_region_at_a_glance
Quote:About 19 million people live along the southern border with Mexico, according to the U.S. Census Data. And an estimated 11 million people in Mexico live along the border with the U.S., according to the latest INEGI data (see map below). The communities that make up the southern border region are growing, diverse and vibrant. This demographic and economic profile paints a picture of communities in California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-14/mapping-who-lives-in-border-patrol-s-100-mile-zone
