New reporting from Michael Shellenberger cites a senior advisor to Rubio stating: “We’re headed toward massive disclosure.”

Quote:Post by Marik vR on X:

Quote:BREAKING: New reporting from @shellenberger cites a senior advisor to Rubio stating:

Quote:“We’re headed toward massive disclosure.”

Quote:Rubio is not alone. Schumer, Rounds, Gillibrand, McConnell (37-year veteran SASC/SSCI staffer), etc. have all suggested that UAP have been retrieved.

Post by ShellenbergerPosted by Shellenberger on X:

Quote:Marco Rubio is the most powerful Secretary of State since Kissinger. As such, it is significant that he believes the US has recovered alien tech and given it to private military contractors. A senior Rubio advisor says, “We’re headed toward massive disclosure.”

More info by ShellenbergerPosted on X:

Quote:[...] As such, it is significant that Rubio believes that elements within the US government have recovered technology from a nonhuman intelligence, reverse-engineered it, and let private military contractors take control of it in ways that could be undermining national security and result in a Pearl Harbor-like event.

Quote:“The real risk in transferring technology that is not useful to us today to a corporate entity over decades,” says Rubio, “is that the corporate entity comes to basically possess and control access to it for their own purposes, not for the purposes of national security.”

Quote:Nick Pope, who investigated Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) for the UK Ministry of Defence, said, “It’s hard to overstate the significance of [Rubio’s] statement. Rubio’s remarks are so forthright that one could speculate they’re officially-authorized prelude to Disclosure, to test the waters ahead of an official, Presidential announcement [...]”

Is it true?The full post also has a link that seems to be behind a paywall. In there is probably the actual info about Rubios senior advisor.
Since i didnt read what's behind the paywall, i keep open the possibility that this is an exaggeration or unfounded rumor. But Shellenberger has done very thorough investigative reporting in the past so he is not some random chap with an X account saying this



Update: Shellenbergers articlehttps://www.public.news/p/secretary-of-s...o-believes
No paywall. It doesn't say who the advisor is

Upvote914Downvote315Go to comments[Image: https://i.redd.it/snoovatar/snoo_assets/...avo_40.png]1

LOL Massive disclosure but not complete transparent disclosure. Got it.

Quote:[Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/185...normal.jpg]
Michael Shellenberger

[Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/164...bigger.jpg]
@shellenberger
·
5h




Since May of this year, Marco Rubio has served in a dual role as President Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor and Secretary of State. The National Security Advisor is the President’s principal in-house advisor on all national security matters, chairs the National Security Council, coordinates the interagency process across the government, and briefs the President daily. As Secretary of State, Rubio negotiates treaties, appoints and directs ambassadors, controls the $84 billion State Department and USAID budget, oversees 80,000 employees at more than 270 diplomatic posts worldwide, and has direct authority over diplomatic security, intelligence sharing, sanctions enforcement, and emergency evacuations of U.S. citizens abroad. The last official to hold both such positions was Henry Kissinger from 1973 to 1975. For Rubio, who was also the former ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and vice-chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, to play both roles reflects President Trump’s high confidence in him. As such, it is significant that Rubio believes that elements within the US government have recovered technology from a nonhuman intelligence, reverse-engineered it, and let private military contractors take control of it in ways that could be undermining national security and result in a Pearl Harbor-like event. “The real risk in transferring technology that is not useful to us today to a corporate entity over decades,” says Rubio, “is that the corporate entity comes to basically possess and control access to it for their own purposes, not for the purposes of national security.” Nick Pope, who investigated Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) for the UK Ministry of Defence, said, “It’s hard to overstate the significance of [Rubio’s] statement. Rubio’s remarks are so forthright that one could speculate they’re officially-authorized prelude to Disclosure, to test the waters ahead of an official, Presidential announcement.” The State Department declined to provide an on-the-record comment to Public for this story. A spokesperson for the Department of War said it had no “verifiable information to substantiate claims that any U.S. government or private company programs regarding the possession or reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial materials and technology have existed in the past or exist currently...." Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism and to read the full article! https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1995904410166460537?s=20…
Michael Shellenberger

[Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/164...bigger.jpg]
@shellenberger
·Any true skeptic of this issue should want significantly more government transparency and disclosure on UAP. Anyone arguing against greater transparency and disclosure is telling you that they want to continue the cover-up. If you belive that this is all a dangerous delusion and social contagion resulting from years of government disinfo to cover up secret weapons programs, which has now infected the highest levels of government, then you should be the loudest advocate for UAP transparency and disclosure in the world. The secrecy has gone on for too long. It is destablizing for our highest security, defense, and intelligence officials say one thing to journalists and filmmakers and for the DOD to say something completely different. The State Department, CIA, ODNI, and White House all declined to comment publicly for my piece. We need our government officials to be honest about what is going on. There is no security justification for this level of secrecy. We are free people governed by a constitution that protects us against unaccountable government actors. We must fight to maintain that status.
 

 

Quote: 
[Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/196...normal.jpg]
TxGalAV
@TXGalav

38s

Replying to
@BadMouth7160
@ShadowofEzra


It’s understandable to be frustrated but these criminals have gotten away with it for DECADES.

I’m pretty pleased with the disclosure and movement I’m seeing. I’ll reassess in 12 months lol.

Quote: 

MKULTRA_Escapee
•40m ago
 Top 1% Commenter
Democrats have been involved since the Obama administration, well before the current disclosure push. You'll need the history to get the full picture, and I'll try to make this chronological, but current Democrats pushing for UFO disclosure include Chuck Schumer, Robert Garcia, and Jared Moskowitz.
2007: Democrat Senator Harry Reid (Senate Majority Leader 2007 to 2015) is the actual politician who spearheaded this modern push for transparency. Everyone else came later. The whole story starts there in 2007, then Democrat Chuck Schumer (Senate Minority Leader 2017 to 2021, Senate Majority Leader 2021 to 2025) carried on Reid's legacy spearheading disclosure attempts with new legislation, etc, but between those two, a lot was going on.

Quote:Initiated by then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada)[9] as the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP) to study unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP) at the urging of Reid's friend, Nevada billionaire and governmental contractor Robert Bigelow,[10] and with support from the late senators Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) and Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), the program began in the DIA in 2007 and was budgeted $22 million over its five years of operation.[3][4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_A...on_Program

2013: The 2013 Citizen's Hearing on UFO Disclosure was a mock hearing with former politicians who might have sway in DC. This was the best they could do at the time. Then-current politicians were not risking their reputations for such a thing at that time, so they used former politicians instead. These included former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel (D-Alaska), and former Representatives Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (D-Michigan), Roscoe Bartlett (R-Maryland), Merrill Cook (R-Utah), Darlene Hooley (D-Oregon), and Lynn Woolsey (D-California). Four Democrats and two Republicans. 2013 Citizen Hearing playlist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=249RG52U...j0VA6ZH0_p
2016: A lot of people expected Hillary Clinton to win in 2016. She campaigned on UFO transparency, as well as her Campaign Chief and former chief of staff to Bill Clinton, John Podesta. Podesta also wrote the forward to Leslie Kean's 2011 seminal book on UFOs and was working behind the scenes on UFO transparency during Clinton's 2016 campaign as we found out in wikileaks leaked emails.
2020-2021: The Obama Administration made what I'll call a belated UFO announcement. I think the data they obtained from AAWSAP/AATIP was briefed to high level officials during the Obama admin. Obama, his former CIA Director, former Deputy CIA Director, and former Director of National Intelligence all came out in late 2020 and 2021 with interesting comments on UFOs: https://np.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/zu...came_into/ It certainly looked orchestrated, but only his Deputy CIA Director was still in office at the time, then as Biden's DNI, and the rest were former, which is why I'm calling it belated.
Also see: Jacques Vallee reveals the true origins of UFO Disclosure (the Obama Administration) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8QJ3hXynMA

---

To sum up: You've got Democrat majority leader Harry Reid in 2007 initiating the whole thing, AAWSAP begins and lasts 2 years, Obama gets inaugurated 2009, AATIP begins. I think Obama bigwigs get briefed during that administration, then Hillary campaigns on UFO transparency and everyone expected she'd win the 2016 election. Her campaign chief was working behind the scenes with Tom Delonge, a Lockheed bigwig, a General, and others. Trump gets in somehow instead, but they go forward with the 2017 NYTimes article, then several years later Democrat Majority leader Chuck Schumer sponsors the UAP Disclosure act, and the rest you probably know.
The fact that republicans are involved is only because there is no connection between UFOs and partisan politics. It would actually be strange if no republicans were involved at all. They are going to be interested in weird objects in the sky, too.

Marco Rubio

@marcorubio


Unidentified objects intruding on U.S. airspace isn’t about space aliens and it isn’t new I have been warning about this problem for years
 

Quote: 
r/UFOs•2 days ago
87LucasOliveira
[Image: https://i.redd.it/gqujlodqi3yd1.png] Top 1% Poster

Bret Baier reports on secret Government UAP program allegations — interviews Karl Nell, Tim Gallaudet, Peter Skafish & Senator Mark Kelly - “This is going to change the arc of human history. We’re not alone in the universe and higher order non-human intelligences are visiting us.”

I hope disclosure is coming! 
I watched the age of disclosure, and although it was stuff I already had heard. I had not seen it all in one place with High ranking Gov Officials chiming in. It was very good, and you can tell that there is ALOT of pressure on Trump to Disclose the truth. It would give him the Presidential Legacy he so badly wants.

He just needs to say it. We are not alone, we have proof and contact.

Just get it over with already so the world can do whatever we are going to do after.

There is a lot of possibilities with disclosure, not all good, but we have a right to know, no matter what.

(12-02-2025, 08:07 PM)Darkblade Wrote: I hope disclosure is coming! 
I watched the age of disclosure, and although it was stuff I already had heard. I had not seen it all in one place with High ranking Gov Officials chiming in. It was very good, and you can tell that there is ALOT of pressure on Trump to Disclose the truth. It would give him the Presidential Legacy he so badly wants.

He just needs to say it. We are not alone, we have proof and contact.

Just get it over with already so the world can do whatever we are going to do after.

There is a lot of possibilities with disclosure, not all good, but we have a right to know, no matter what.

                                 
It's not what was said, it was who was saying it


Im realistic; sure, it could all be bullshit, but how often does a Secretary of State/ National Security Advisor speak so candidly about the subject?

Besides, it's all we have till when and if TPTB decide if we can hear the rest of the story
 

Quote: 
Go to UFOs
r/UFOs•1 hr. ago
OnceReturned

Rubio walks back Age of Disclosure claims on Hannity tonight
DisclosureJust watched. It was a very brief part of their interview. I will post a clip soon when one is available.
His comments were very discouraging. He basically said, "My remarks in the film were taken out of context. I can't verify any of this stuff and I don't want to call the other people making these claims liars."

(12-02-2025, 05:36 PM)putnam6 Wrote: New reporting from Michael Shellenberger cites a senior advisor to Rubio stating: “We’re headed toward massive disclosure.”

So they can tell us about aliens but not all the Epstein info?

How very ""convenient"".

Look here, look here, don't look over there, else you'll see what my hands don't want you to see. 

(12-02-2025, 05:37 PM)quintessentone Wrote: LOL Massive disclosure but not complete transparent disclosure. Got it.

Because obviously there are actual national security risks... Come on this site is called Deny ignorance not Reddit.