(11-22-2025, 10:19 PM)putnam6 Wrote: What one needs to realize the government and the MIC don't want to release anything, so they will slow-play the hell out of this. 

Im of the opinion that if real, and it's been 80 years, the government knows there will be repercussions if the GP were to learn some of the truths 
of what earlier governments and corporations did.  TPTB aren't just going to ripoff the UHO/UAP band aid 



Look forward to your videos... 

the truth is out there...

Exactly. Everyone needs to realize that they didn't lie, gaslight, steal, murder over the suppression of this topic for 80 years -- just to tell us the truth all in one swoop. Which means, all they would give us is a 10% truth, mixed with a bunch of lies.




We will be running the gamut. All the outlets. I'll send links once we are up officially up and running.

(11-22-2025, 04:25 PM)putnam6 Wrote: Much more likely, I won't see it in my lifetime, which bothers me because I always thought I'd see disclosure

only personal encounters matter. What good does it do if government rep personality tells you that 'we confirm' alien life.
like, what the following reaction any consider should be?

(11-23-2025, 06:35 PM)Darkorange Wrote: only personal encounters matter. What good does it do if government rep personality tells you that 'we confirm' alien life.
like, what the following reaction any consider should be?

Come on it depends on the nature of the NHI, I suspect they are pushing disclosure nice and slow but we are stuck trying to figure out the tech.

But if there are new ideas about energy, that one aspect could be revolutionary. 

saw this elsewhere

 

Quote:Five questions on "The Age of Disclosure" documentary
Disclosure
 
I just went through “The Age of Disclosure” and tried to separate “this feels powerful” from “this is actually evidenced.” I’d love input from both believers and hard skeptics on five specific points.

1. The witness pile-up The documentary lines up around 30+ high-credential people (pilots, intel, launch officers, ex–program managers, sitting and former officials) saying UAP are real, important, and under-investigated. Even if you ignore the crash/retrieval stuff, the sheer density and continuity of those careers is hard to shrug off. Critical angle: credentials don’t make someone right; at best they raise the prior that they’re not all cranks. Question: what is the “correct” way to update our beliefs given this many serious insiders, knowing humans with great résumés are still prone to error, hype, and groupthink?
   
2. UAP around nukes and strategic assets Across decades, the film leans heavily on a pattern: UAP near carrier groups, missile fields, and nuclear sites, with stories of shutdowns, comms glitches, and even missiles allegedly entering launch mode. That clustering is intuitively compelling; it sounds like ISR on the most important toys we have. Critical angle: official reviews (recent AARO report, USAF explanations of specific incidents) say no confirmed link between UFOs and those failures; a lot is still anecdotes plus circumstantial timing. Question: how strong is this “nukes pattern” once you strip out confirmation bias and storytelling? Does anyone have hard data beyond witness memories and secondary writeups?
   
3. The 80-year “Legacy Program” crash-retrieval story The film’s biggest swing is the idea of an ultra-secret crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering program running for ~80 years, often via contractors; multiple people echo some version of “non-human craft” and “biologics.” As a narrative, it is extremely compelling; it neatly explains rumors, secrecy, and why normal oversight would miss it. Critical angle: AARO and DoD have very explicitly said they’ve found no evidence of such a program or of recovered non-human hardware, despite looking into those allegations. Question: in light of those official denials, what would you need to see (documents, leaks, physical samples, contractor whistleblowers, etc.) before treating the Legacy-Program story as more than a high-octane rumor?
   
4. The “Observables” and the physics case The “Observables” segment (hypersonic speeds, instantaneous acceleration, transmedium behavior, no obvious propulsion, etc.) is the most intellectually satisfying part of the film; it tries to turn anecdotes into a physics category. If even a fraction of those performance claims are accurate, we are looking at something outside known human tech. Critical angle: the wild numbers (e.g., tens of thousands of mph, 90-degree turns without sonic booms) depend on interpreting noisy, sometimes single-sensor data; independent analysts have argued many of those figures are artifacts or mis-models. Question: which specific “observable” do you think survives the hardest scrutiny right now, and which ones are most likely to collapse under better data and analysis?
   
5. The institutional story: obstruction, ideology, and contractor capture One of the film’s more grounded arcs is about bureaucracy itself: religious staffers calling UAP “demonic” and blocking work; stigma and career risk shutting people up; contractors allegedly swooping in to control evidence; Congress getting stonewalled and creating new laws/structures in response. Even if you assume every “non-human” claim is wrong, that picture of how the system behaves is pretty disturbing. Critical angle: some of this can also be explained by normal classification rules, CYA behavior, and mundane turf wars, without needing a grand cover-up. Question: what do you think is the most plausible, evidence-based explanation for why UAP work has been so fragmented and contentious inside government: actual illegal hidden programs, ordinary bureaucratic dysfunction, culture war stuff, or some mix?
   

I’m not asking “are there aliens, yes or no”; I’m asking how we, as a community, should weigh these five pillars once we factor in both the transcript and the recent AARO/DoD findings. Interested in answers that go beyond vibes and try to spell out a standard of evidence.

Drones allowed the crazies do things they never imagined they could do, and we have enabled them as a side effect of re-inventing war. It is going to get a lot worse.

I also believe the military has the capability of vaporizing them en masse, but does not want to show their hand in such a trivial matter, except that some of them are not so 'crazy' and are perhaps purposely trying to get that to happen in an attempt to expose the capability.

E.T. may come to the conclusion that Disclosure should be about how stupid we are before any kind of intelligent and meaningful revelations come out of all of this. 

Really, think about this: If you are a responsible citizen, with a good job , kids in college and planning a retirement... Would you want a formal Disclosure to be announced, when we have such evidence of the impending mayhem that a significant percentage of our population would inflict on our financial, political and social structure?   

Clearly, I do not think we are ready for that. I think that most of us know that E.T. exists, and just leave it at that until we can handle the details.

(11-23-2025, 10:34 PM)charlyv Wrote: Drones allowed the crazies do things they never imagined they could do, and we have enabled them as a side effect of re-inventing war. It is going to get a lot worse.

I also believe the military has the capability of vaporizing them en masse, but does not want to show their hand in such a trivial matter, except that some of them are not so 'crazy' and are perhaps purposely trying to get that to happen in an attempt to expose the capability.

E.T. may come to the conclusion that Disclosure should be about how stupid we are before any kind of intelligent and meaningful revelations come out of all of this. 

Really, think about this: If you are a responsible citizen, with a good job , kids in college and planning a retirement... Would you want a formal Disclosure to be announced, when we have such evidence of the impending mayhem that a significant percentage of our population would inflict on our financial, political and social structure?   

Clearly, I do not think we are ready for that. I think that most of us know that E.T. exists, and just leave it at that until we can handle the details.

Yeah, collectively, the whole world will never be ready. And thats what TPTB hide behind

Were we ready for the responsibility of atomic bombs?  

Hell, any secular country is going to have issues with some aspects of this, if not a lot.

Sometimes you have to drag some of the population kicking and screaming into the next age of enlightenment.




we should not limit private scientific research, yet we do.

Came back to post this.  Great job kk.

What a shame this documentary is 18 euro to rent on Prime...I guess money is more important than disclosure.

(10-16-2025, 04:45 PM)UltraBudgie Wrote: mfw this comes out and disclosure actually happens

[Image: https://media0.giphy.com/media/3o72F8t9T.../giphy.gif]

aliens like "we was just waiting for you to say"

Disclosures has already happened. 

We’ve had high and low ranking officials from the military, intelligence agencies and government say ‘aliens are real, we have their craft.’

I doubt we will ever have an announcement from a podium.

This documentary explains why, at least the director did on Joe Rogan:
A lot of illegal poop happened and money was put in personal accounts from the over one trillion spent on it over the years. Felonies in many categories. Oh and ‘the public can’t handle the truth, it would destroy the economy" Bush and Trump administrations decided.

It’s been done in a way that those that care to know can see the truth. Those that refuse to believe can continue to refuse. Kinda elegant, in a way. In 100 years people will look back and wonder why there was ever a question. 

So this is the only disclosure you will ever get.



edit to add: Rogan interview of director quoted (paraphrased) above.

I am interested in the opinion of anyone who watched the "Disclosure of the Ages" on Prime.   I want to know if anything new was disclosed.

I am all for a review... don't mind those at all...

But if I have to enter a contract with a provider, for one show... not gonna happen.

Perhaps some later, less prestigious release that doesn't include 'partner' overhead.