USA just sunk a drug boat from Venezuela

[Moon68]

More illegal drugs seized in Operation Pacific Viper.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/watch-c...viper-raid
 


Tax dollars well spent! Keep up the good work boys and girls!

A Hellfire would've been cheaper in the long run.

[PorkChop96]

A Hellfire would've been cheaper in the long run.

I still think we need to take a page out of Russia playbook and let millionaires charter boats to hunt drug cartels and pirates with M2 Brownings and Barrett's. 

What national debt?

[Vermilion]

I still think we need to take a page out of Russia playbook and let millionaires charter boats to hunt drug cartels and pirates with M2 Brownings and Barrett's. 

What national debt?

And turn it into a reality tv show.

“Hey kids come on in here! ‘Cartel’ is about to start!”

[andy06shake]

And turn it into a reality tv show.

“Hey kids come on in here! ‘Cartel’ is about to start!”

I would probably watch that. LoL

Quick question, all the same, what do you think the ""Millionaires"" would do with the drugs they capture? 

Because it's all corrupt from top to bottom.

And one man's cartel member, is another alphabet agenncies ""business partner.""

Still, it would make great TV, in a "Narcos" crossed with "The Running Man" sort of manner. 

[Moon68]

I would probably watch that. LoL

Quick question, all the same, what do you think the ""Millionaires"" would do with the drugs they capture? 

Because it's all corrupt from top to bottom.

And one man's cartel member, is another alphabet agenncies ""business partner.""

Still, it would make great TV. 

My guess? The fish in the area would be BUZZIN! Pufferfish chasing sharks with a serious case of the munchies. Morey eels all paranoid and shit.

[andy06shake]

My guess? The fish in the area would be BUZZIN! Pufferfish chasing sharks with a serious case of the munchies. Morey eels all paranoid and shit.

How about "Sharks with laser beams attached to their heads?" 

Surely that's got to be possible by now?   

[Moon68]

How about "Sharks with laser beams attached to their heads?" 

Surely that's got to be possible by now?   

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFavIUmhcE]

Herding the narco-terrorists. I like that idea!

[SurferSoul]

If they were narco-terrorists, then I'd call it a good Tuesday.

Did they manage to take out big pharma?

[IDELB2006]

I still think we need to take a page out of Russia playbook and let millionaires charter boats to hunt drug cartels and pirates with M2 Brownings and Barrett's. 

What national debt?

My thought was giving the millionaires a couple of safer options.

Maybe give them the controls of a drone from the safety of land. For more of that hand of god experience, they could take over the controls of the drone from a plane a few thousand feet above the target.

[UltraBudgie]

Retroactive immunity?

Draft Bill Would Authorize Trump to Wage Drug Trafficking War

The potential legislation would grant President Trump sweeping power to use military force if he saw a link to “narco-terrorists.”

Draft legislation is circulating at the White House and on Capitol Hill that would hand President Trump sweeping power to wage war against drug cartels he deems to be “terrorists,” as well as against any nation he says has harbored or aided them, according to people familiar with the matter.

A wide range of legal specialists have said that U.S. military attacks this month on two boats suspected of smuggling drugs in the Caribbean Sea were illegal. But Mr. Trump has claimed that the Constitution gave him the power he needed to authorize it.

It was not clear who wrote the draft congressional authorization or whether it could pass the Republican-led Congress, but the White House has been passing it around the executive branch.

The broadly worded proposal, which would grant sprawling authority to Mr. Trump for five years to use American military force in a drug trafficking war, has set off alarm bells in some quarters of the executive branch and on Capitol Hill, according to people who spoke on the condition of anonymity about sensitive internal deliberations....

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/19/us/po...ation.html