UK Guide To Political Wrongthink

[Oldcarpy2]

You’ve finally realized that’s what we’ve been telling you for years.
Now you want to use it on us? LoL
Cheers mate.


By the way, that wasn’t a troll, just an on topic observation.

Have any comment about the destruction of the UK and the plan as I see it?

Why, yes.  The UK is not being destroyed and there is no plan, as you see it, or otherwise.

We have our problems, as do you.

[UltraBudgie]

[Oldcarpy2]

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...c7a38a.jpg]

What?  No brown people or LBGTQ folk?

I'm offended....

[ANNEE]

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...c7a38a.jpg]

Scary 

[andy06shake]

What?  No brown people or LBGTQ folk?

I'm offended....

They must have been taking the pictures. 

[Oldcarpy2]

They must have been taking the pictures. 

Your name, vil also go in ze book...

[andy06shake]

Your name, vil also go in ze book...

Just what the world needs, more toilet paper. 

[ANNEE]

Whatever happened to talking to your kids?

We just farm them out to AI now?

[andy06shake]

Whatever happened to talking to your kids?

We just farm them out to AI now?

Problem is that in this day of age most people are forced to work just about every hour god sends to make ends meet and keep the lights on.

I have to ponder if the lack of communication is down to exhaustion or fear of getting it wrong?  

Parenting is becoming a lost art.

Simply because time is money.

And people can't do two things at once.

[UltraBudgie]

As far as I can tell, Shout Out UK is a private enterprise and not our Govt.

That said, this thing is pretty dumb.

As is calling for our nukes to be taken away.

Yes the developer is private but it is Home Office funded:

A state-funded computer game is warning teenagers that they risk being referred to a counter-terrorism programme if they question mass migration.
Pathways is an interactive game designed for 11- to 18-year-old pupils and funded by Prevent, a Home Office programme for tackling extremism.

Young players are directed to help their in-game characters – a white teenage boy and girl – to avoid being reported for “extreme Right-wing ideology” after discussing migration online.

Characters can face extremism referrals if they choose to engage with groups that spread “harmful ideological messages”, or join protests against the “erosion of British values”. Even researching online immigration statistics is portrayed negatively.

Other in-game pitfalls include sharing a video that claims Muslim men, rather than homeless veterans, are being given emergency accommodation.

An in-game meter monitors how extreme the character’s behaviour is. Those who “lose” may be given counselling to deal with “ideological thoughts” or referred to an anti-terrorism expert.

The game was developed with government backing by councils in East Yorkshire over growing concerns about immigration and tensions about migrant accommodation in their communities.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01...extremist/

Have you tried the different paths?
https://www.shoutoutuk.org/game/story.html

From a pure game-design point of view, it's poorly wrought in that the game choices you make don't line up with the character actions that unfold. Try the B-path, for example.


A tiny note that it is amusing that the British spelling of "program" is "program me".