07-20-2024, 03:36 PM
(07-20-2024, 01:46 PM)VulcanWerks Wrote: Totally fair.
It does seem as though the admin has a “plan only for victory” mindset.
I appreciate the bravado it is foolish thinking to assume something is 100% going to work.
As an example, sports history is littered with people missing/failing very simple acts at pivotal times that cost them victory. Very simple mistakes.
Maybe it’s my background in risk management but IMO you always have to make contingencies. And the larger the impact, the more you need to be prepared. So that drives my thinking.
The MSM and Admin seemed caught pretty flat footed regarding what to do next after this happened.
My point above was to say they DID plan only for victory… and that victory plan likely had some other facets to it that didn’t materialize.
If you can identify those other parts of the victory plan you learn a lot about who was involved or behind this.
Well I'm just a simple thinker, but when you try to kill a presidential candidate that currently isnt in office, there's really not alot of people that would actually benefit from it happening aside from the political rival or a personal grudge. Then who would have the most means to make it happen. Just my idea.
