07-20-2024, 12:35 PM
A thought:
If this was an inside job, which it appears to be, then the organizers would likely have assumed chaos would follow.
Even thinking at the scale and capability of the feds, I think there would have to be some kind of next step in the plan knowing you’d more-less have a revolution on your hands. Or, if “Revolution” is too strong then you’d at least have a very high probability of societal unrest at scale.
That said, you could reasonably assume there was a “next step” to this plan. You could table-top lots of scenarios and I’d be surprised if that didn’t occur.
So, do we have any evidence of National Guard buildups or activations? Troop mobilizations? Large “exercises” in July? Increased strategic air command activity? Larger than normal activity at supply bases or guard stations? Alerts to guard members regarding activation?
Point being that, in my mind, this event would have been the start not the end of the plan.
If being “the start” is right, I suspect there is evidence to be found about who was coordinating all of that. It would have come down from on high but wouldn’t necessarily have required everyone to need to know the circumstances of why the alert was sent - and would have been planned in advance.
I can also see the angle that there was no “next step” specifically but rather a whole bunch of contingency plans - the societal response dictates the government response. Would make it seem more organic (though I think would introduce way too many variables and risk).
Any insights into other happenings around the assassination attempt?
Yes, I can search for this (and will) but I have found that people on here have better information at times.
If this was an inside job, which it appears to be, then the organizers would likely have assumed chaos would follow.
Even thinking at the scale and capability of the feds, I think there would have to be some kind of next step in the plan knowing you’d more-less have a revolution on your hands. Or, if “Revolution” is too strong then you’d at least have a very high probability of societal unrest at scale.
That said, you could reasonably assume there was a “next step” to this plan. You could table-top lots of scenarios and I’d be surprised if that didn’t occur.
So, do we have any evidence of National Guard buildups or activations? Troop mobilizations? Large “exercises” in July? Increased strategic air command activity? Larger than normal activity at supply bases or guard stations? Alerts to guard members regarding activation?
Point being that, in my mind, this event would have been the start not the end of the plan.
If being “the start” is right, I suspect there is evidence to be found about who was coordinating all of that. It would have come down from on high but wouldn’t necessarily have required everyone to need to know the circumstances of why the alert was sent - and would have been planned in advance.
I can also see the angle that there was no “next step” specifically but rather a whole bunch of contingency plans - the societal response dictates the government response. Would make it seem more organic (though I think would introduce way too many variables and risk).
Any insights into other happenings around the assassination attempt?
Yes, I can search for this (and will) but I have found that people on here have better information at times.
