Trump and Epstein were great buddies

[FlyersFan]

What would send droves of Patriots into the arms of Antifa?

Stupidity.
Lack of personal responsibility.
Indoctrination.

[cherokeetroy]

[cherokeetroy]

62 million votes in 2016
74 million votes in 2020
77 million votes in 2024

No one is leaving. In fact, the Constitutional Movement is getting larger. It is not Trump. He just created the platform. This is them against  the Progressive Left. There is no red or blue anymore and DC has been exposed as well as multiple mayors and governors for lying and stealing from hard working Americans. 

A 40 day shutdown that embarrassed them and 'suddenly' a vague email that everyone already knew about drops in the media? 

If Trump was involved with Epstein he never would have won in 2016. 

They were friends in the same circle till Trump learned who he really was.

If there is a genuine Constitutional Movement, you'll have to abandon Trump
He's compromised

[putnam6]

No.  Perhaps a tame Badger?

No, none of your suspect cookies, please....

Do you have to tuck away your tadger....

[putnam6]

If there is a genuine Constitutional Movement, you'll have to abandon Trump
He's compromised

The weight/pressure is building; there's no doubt that if it were to reach critical mass, it's just simmering for now.

If the pachyderms don't perform well in the 2026 midterms, maybe

The Republicans won't let Trump destroy the large advantage they currently have over the Democrats. 

All that means is interim President Vance, who still looks better than anything the Democrats currently have

[UltraBudgie]

They never do.   People die, special negotiations between cabal members prevail,
("backroom deals" are mostly what detracts from what should be "honorable" service to
the citizens (as they promise most sincerely.)

When discovered in some malignant plot... rendering the discoverer inert is the first objective.

Why do you think these people live in constant fear of 'exposure?' ... it's not because they
are all innocent.  

Oh, I remember this wrinkled case...

The diplomat knew that by all rights, his own country would prosecute
if we charged him and then released him to them...
he successfully shmoozed his way into withdrawing from the situation...
In his home turf  they had a "broader influence" over the press.

Pays to have people in your corner.

Poor maid was pilloried in the foreign press... shameless...
sort of like what we do to ...
well... never mind.

Interesting bit from the emails about this.



A "great opportunity"...

[cherokeetroy]

The weight/pressure is building; there's no doubt that if it were to reach critical mass, it's just simmering for now.

If the pachyderms don't perform well in the 2026 midterms, maybe

The Republicans won't let Trump destroy the large advantage they currently have over the Democrats. 

All that means is interim President Vance, who still looks better than anything the Democrats currently have

It has to be a grassroots movement stemming directly from citizens
No one in government has incentive to put power back in the hands of the people 
They're handing it over to the technocracy

[ANNEE]

Interesting bit from the emails about this.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...030628.jpg]

A "great opportunity"...

To that I’d say “who brings the money?”  

Money — Power — Control

He didn’t seem to have a shortage of young girls — with replacements only a step away. L

[UltraBudgie]

To that I’d say “who brings the money?”  

Money — Power — Control

He didn’t seem to have a shortage of young girls — with replacements only a step away. L

Money is an epiphenomena of power, not a source. Being concerned with it is poor-people thinking; a preoccupation to dominate the lives of those who are led, not those who lead. The commonly-accepted adage "follow the money"—implanted in the public's perception as a truism by the Watergate drama—couldn't be more wrong. That only susses out sloppy middlemen. In the higher echelons of power, it's follow the owed favours, the associations, the family ties, the circles of common interest, the history. That's the currency there.

[Maxmars]

Money is an epiphenomena of power, not a source. Being concerned with it is poor-people thinking; a preoccupation to dominate the lives of those who are led, not those who lead. The commonly-accepted adage "follow the money"—implanted in the public's perception as a truism by the Watergate drama—couldn't be more wrong. That only susses out sloppy middlemen. In the higher echelons of power, it's follow the owed favours, the associations, the family ties, the circles of common interest, the history. That's the currency there.

Kudos.... "Follow the money" is for when you have no idea where to begin...
"Who wrote the check?" is what we really need to know.

Mostly, those answers exist.... they are called Bank records... OOOPS... PRIVACY...