DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Trump and Epstein were great buddies
(11-12-2025, 02:22 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Vermilion wrote:

"Well they wanted people to think there’s a new victim, that’s why.The truth is it was Virginia Guiffre’s name they redacted. LoL".

Firstly, sex trafficking is not funny.

Secondly, that is a rather desperate stretch.

Trump is in the Epstein thing up to his eyeballs.

The shit has hit the fan.

PS.  Actually it's clear now that the victim who Trump spent "hours" with was VG.

I suppose they were just playing Monopoly or something?



These Epstein/Maxwell emails reference Virginia Giuffre.

Giuffre's testimony contradicts them:

She never saw Trump and Epstein together.

Trump never acted inappropriately towards her (no sex and no flirting).

She was never at Epstein's house with Trump.

Read them for yourself here, if you dare..
https://x.com/Techno_Fog/status/1988631109140136078

The funny part is your batting average is .000
(11-12-2025, 02:28 PM)UltraBudgie Wrote: "You are watching a movie" - Q

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/singdo.jpg]

"Do wah diddy, diddy, dum diddy do..."



Nah.  We are watching a train wreck.

"Send lawyers guns and money, the shit has hit the fan".

- Warren Zevon.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
(11-12-2025, 02:27 PM)andy06shake Wrote: [Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgh0tazGAX4]
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c2dr3z9egljt


Interesting Trump is described as...

"dog that did not bark, the [Lit.] A phrase from Arthur Conan *Doyle's Sherlock *Holmes story ‘Silver Blaze’ (1892). Holmes refers to ‘the curious incident of the dog in the night-time’, namely that a watchdog did not bark during the theft of a racehorse from a stable, suggesting that the dog probably knew the thief.... ..."

------

Trump was just another bystander who looked the other way. 

"Evil continues when good men do nothing".

VG has always denied trump had anything to do with her abuse.
"The only journey is the one within."
(11-12-2025, 02:31 PM)Vermilion Wrote: These Epstein/Maxwell emails reference Virginia Giuffre.

Giuffre's testimony contradicts them:

She never saw Trump and Epstein together.

Trump never acted inappropriately towards her (no sex and no flirting).

She was never at Epstein's house with Trump.

Read them for yourself here, if you dare..
https://x.com/Techno_Fog/status/1988631109140136078

The funny part is your batting average is .000


Sure.  I'm not batting but keep up the personal stuff.

There is nothing funny about Epstein's crimes.

But you seem to think so.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
(11-12-2025, 02:09 PM)Maxmars Wrote: I've tried to stay away from this thread, because sometimes, I feel like responding to every post... must be some form of compulsive mental illness...  

But just to offer something which seems to be echoing around for a while now...

Have you noticed how the process of "releasing" all this information is like watching two surgeons with tweezers, plucking out grains of sand from a wound...

and how... people keep referring to the privacy of a theoretically involved person as a "shield."

I want to point out that, at least in the US, once criminal charges are brought... the accused forfeits their "privacy" to an extent normally considered egregiously intrusive.  The law doesn't "grant" privacy, the Constitution seems to only imply it's existence, never mandating a right to it.

Once the names are evident, the crime MUST be investigated and accounted for.

So why is it so hard to just... let the data go?

We can't be so stupid and naive to think this is actually about "dignity" and "rights."
(We have, surrendered the victim... by pretending it is just incidental to privacy.

What this "conspiracy" is about, is a million other things... some downright frightening, and the stuff of Hollywood horror, others are just basely criminal.

"They" have "privacy?"   What the hell does that mean?
If someone finds you in a dark alley and kills you... will their "privacy" protect them?  No.

I can't believe that my friend went to prison for having a few ounces of marijuana in his car,
yet these people, have industrialized the consumption of children... to the tune of billions...
which insane and probably complicit "elite officials" actually piggybacked their B/S onto....


Screw all of them utterly.
Let it be a bloodbath of shame and persecution.

Even if it "hurts" the country (meaning there will be retaliation) at least we can stop pretending that there is no huge cabal of "people eaters," gleefully pretending they are 'virtuous' and 'trustworthy' leaders of the world.

I'm honestly shocked the Democrats are moving ahead full steam which makes me think they must feel pretty confident they have full control over their particular spin

I just want to see the whole thing blow up in all their faces. If it gains momentum beyond their grasp, it has the potential to unravel so, so much
[Image: ZwoMlbL.jpeg]

Link
MAGA Jesus says:
 
"If ye findeth grass in the infield, thou shalt play ball."
 
Donald "the dog that didn't bark" Trump, Epstein, and every fake xtian (MAGA, republican or democrat) on Earth obeyed!

Release the files! All of them! If it means Billy and Hilly Clinton, Bill Gates, Biden, Trump or the Pope himself are cell neighbours, so be it.

Pedophiles should not be enabled or protected. They should be tarred and feathered for all to see. Messing with a child is the most despicable act.

Let the chips fall where they may!
There is one rule that I know of, babies. God damn it, you've got to be kind.
If the evil left had ANYTHING on Trump, we'd have seen it by now.

Oh for F sakes!

*rolls eyes*
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
(11-12-2025, 08:52 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: If the evil left had ANYTHING on Trump, we'd have seen it by now.

Oh for F sakes!

*rolls eyes*

Who is actually dumb enough to believe the Democrats wouldn't have used this to stop Trump in 2016 and 2024?

They loathe Trump because he has humiliated them for 10 years straight and exposed them for the con artists that they really are.

You can't make this shit up.
(11-12-2025, 09:18 PM)RazorV66 Wrote: Who is actually dumb enough to believe the Democrats wouldn't have used this to stop Trump in 2016 and 2024?

They loathe Trump because he has humiliated them for 10 years straight and exposed them for the con artists that they really are.

You can't make this shit up.

This is Russian Hooker Pee V2.0

 Lol Lol Lol
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Epstein Eugenics? Karl12 48 3,631 03-25-2026, 01:48 PM
Last Post: Karl12
  BREAKING: Goldman Unveils Unredacted File That 'Disputes Everything' Trump Has Said LightAngel 1 350 03-19-2026, 03:00 PM
Last Post: Maxmars
  Ghislaine Maxwell friend named in Epstein files found dead by suicide Waterglass 4 550 03-04-2026, 03:06 PM
Last Post: Byrd
  Epstein And The WEF. Karl12 19 949 02-21-2026, 05:44 AM
Last Post: Karl12
  Epstein And 911. Karl12 12 899 02-18-2026, 01:34 PM
Last Post: BeTheGoddess
  The Smoking Gun Epstein Murdered FlyersFan 8 727 02-08-2026, 01:37 PM
Last Post: UltraBudgie
  The True Coverup - Atlantis and the Epstein Files sahgwa 9 995 02-06-2026, 04:33 PM
Last Post: ARM1968
  Clintons Defy Epstein Subpoena, Blame Trump FlyersFan 106 5,043 02-03-2026, 02:55 PM
Last Post: Karl12
  Epstein files prosecutions, anything? Encia22 0 354 02-02-2026, 06:12 PM
Last Post: Encia22
  Epstein’s Membership in the CFR and Trilateral Commission Bob 9 1,386 02-02-2026, 10:21 AM
Last Post: putnam6