11-06-2025, 11:38 AM
(11-06-2025, 11:31 AM)Vermilion Wrote: Shitty lawyers would.
They ignore evidence.
That’s what makes them shitty.
You mean like Pam Bondi?
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
(11-06-2025, 11:36 AM)Kurokage Wrote: And you do!?!? Yes. And Andrew Mountbatten Windsor (as he now is) paid her £12,000,000.00 because he'd never met her etc. The laughs keep on coming....
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
11-06-2025, 11:59 AM
(11-06-2025, 11:36 AM)Kurokage Wrote: And you do!?!? The difference between you and I, is that I can prove you wrong 99.9% of the time and I don’t say things that are patently false. You’re getting confused. I never said anyone was making up the accusations against Epstein. If you’d actually apply some reading comprehension you’d know this. Weinstein was a known POS. I worked in the film industry in Hollywood for many years, you hear things others don’t. I knew about him before it ever came out.
Apparently I’m in cult now, someone here told me so.
11-06-2025, 12:01 PM
(11-06-2025, 11:59 AM)KrustyKrab Wrote: The difference between you and I, is that I can prove you wrong 99.9% of the time and I don’t say things that are patently false. "Reading comprehension" is it? That's just so lame.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
11-06-2025, 12:05 PM
(11-06-2025, 11:43 AM)cherokeetroy Wrote: [Image: https://i.imgur.com/qaaWaAT.jpeg] "They would be sued into homelessness for naming names, but [Georgia] Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and I are willing to name names in the House of Representatives under Constitutional 'speech or debate' immunity," Massie, from Kentucky, wrote on X on Wednesday night. Members of Congress are protected by the Constitution's "speech or debate clause," which means they cannot face civil or criminal penalties for remarks made in speeches on the House or Senate floors. It means Massie and Greene can read names or make allegations on the House floor without legal consequences. At a news conference on Wednesday, Greene said it is "a scary thing to name names. But I will tell you, I'm not afraid to name names." She added: "If they want to give me a list, I will walk in that Capitol on the House floor and I'll say every damn name that abused these women." https://www.newsweek.com/epstein-list-co...ne-2124273 This was on September 3rd. Where are those names? Why haven’t they named them on the floor like they said they would? Do you feel like they’re taking you on a ride yet?
11-06-2025, 12:32 PM
(11-06-2025, 12:05 PM)Vermilion Wrote: "They would be sued into homelessness for naming names, but [Georgia] Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and I are willing to name names in the House of Representatives under Constitutional 'speech or debate' immunity," Massie, from Kentucky, wrote on X on Wednesday night.
(11-06-2025, 11:59 AM)KrustyKrab Wrote: The difference between you and I, is that I can prove you wrong 99.9% of the time and I don’t say things that are patently false. Keep patting yourself on the back, after enough time you'll believe any old bullshit. Look, some innocent party goers!! ![]()
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
11-06-2025, 01:32 PM
(11-06-2025, 01:18 PM)Kurokage Wrote: Keep patting yourself on the back, after enough time you'll believe any old bullshit. What are those medals?
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
11-06-2025, 01:35 PM
(11-06-2025, 01:18 PM)Kurokage Wrote: Keep patting yourself on the back, after enough time you'll believe any old bullshit.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|