306 |
6,483 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(11-19-2025, 03:18 PM)Maxmars Wrote: Watch the fire spread... remember all those "people" who suddenly up and walked away from their careers in the 'entertainment' industry when Diddy stumbled into the public eye?
From your link (for those who are interested,)
We are going to have to realize that where the is money, there will be a percentage of graft and corruption. It's human nature...
Can still hear my Dad say, "Never trust anyone when it comes to money and sex." The older I get, the more I realize how true this is.
It doesn't mean everybody is that way, but when money and sex are involved, all bets are off, and one needs to be extra cautious
Money-Sex-Power
without those 3
where would
graft and corruption, be?
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

11-19-2025, 05:08 PM
This post was last modified: 11-19-2025, 05:10 PM by cherokeetroy. 
0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(11-19-2025, 03:39 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: Another potential perp named specifically by Trump as an Epstein island visitor is Reid Hoffman
Hoffman is connected to OpenAI through a professional relationship with CEO Sam Altman
Larry Summers joins OpenAI board
Summers has been described as an "evil man"
Altman has been described as a " sociopath"
Altman is involved with Trump's Stargate Project
He's allegedly a rival to Elon Musk
Watch all these connections to Epstein tie into the trans/post human movement
AI religious cult started in Silicon Valley
Eugenics, Accelerationists, Extinctionists, TESCREAL, Dark Enlightenment
Interesting that you didn’t mention Reid Hoffman funding fellow sociopath EJean Carroll’s lawsuit against Trump….
Reid Hoffman Is Funding E. Jean Carroll’s Lawsuit Against Donald Trump
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/04/...ffman.html
504 |
6,234 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

You know, from my point of view, it's not that the graft, corruption, and conspiracy exists...
It's that it seems the entire cabal just "rides along" pretending they don't know.
And when confronted with the facts, they "posture" and virtue signal on the
"oh so persuasive media" that "our hands are tied."
No they are not tied. They never have been.
No one dares bring up the "mea culpa" too soon...
politically toxic... when you were part of a larger "enterprise."
This has nothing to do with politics at all... sorry to pull the "example" rug
out from under you...
Now we have to ask "when were we informed of this circumstance, how long ago...?" and think about
the price some young people had top pay for 'listening to their 'press' core."
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(11-19-2025, 05:42 PM)Vermilion Wrote: Interesting that you didn’t mention Reid Hoffman funding fellow sociopath EJean Carroll’s lawsuit against Trump….
Reid Hoffman Is Funding E. Jean Carroll’s Lawsuit Against Donald Trump
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/04/...ffman.html
Why would I bring it up if it's not tied to OpenAI, Larry Summers or Epstein?
But if you were paying attention you'll notice I posted a screenshot from Sam Altman thanking Hoffman for
spending money to keep Trump from getting reelected
306 |
6,483 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(11-19-2025, 05:44 PM)Maxmars Wrote: You know, from my point of view, it's not that the graft, corruption, and conspiracy exists...
It's that it seems the entire cabal just "rides along" pretending they don't know.
And when confronted with the facts, they "posture" and virtue signal on the
"oh so persuasive media" that "our hands are tied."
No they are not tied. They never have been.
No one dares bring up the "mea culpa" too soon...
politically toxic... when you were part of a larger "enterprise."
This has nothing to do with politics at all... sorry to pull the "example" rug
out from under you...
Now we have to ask "when were we informed of this circumstance, how long ago...?" and think about
the price some young people had top pay for 'listening to their 'press' core."
ABC NewYork was going to do an expose on Epstein in 2015 right before it was to air. Somebody put the kibosh on it likely The Monarchy from which our descendants righteously immigrated away from
Quote:ABC News anchor Amy Robach conducted an extensive on-the-record interview with Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre (then Virginia Roberts). The story detailed Giuffre's allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein, including claims implicating high-profile figures like Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, and Alan Dershowitz. Despite having the material ready to air, ABC executives ultimately shelved it.
Who Put the Kibosh on It?
According to Robach's leaked hot-mic comments (captured in a 2019 video released by Project Veritas and confirmed authentic by ABC insiders), the decision was driven by pressure from multiple sources to protect access to powerful elites:- Buckingham Palace (British Royal Family): Robach stated the Palace "found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways." ABC feared losing exclusive interview access to then-Prince William and Kate Middleton, which "quashed the story." ABC and the Palace both denied direct threats, calling it a "matter for ABC," but the network prioritized royal access over airing the piece.
- Alan Dershowitz (Epstein's former lawyer): Dershowitz, whom Giuffre accused of abuse, reportedly called ABC directly to intervene. He later told NPR he aimed to prevent the network from "enhanc[ing] [Giuffre's] credibility." This pressure contributed to the story being spiked, as ABC cited insufficient corroboration for the allegations.
- Internal ABC Editorial Decisions: Executives dismissed the story early, with Robach recounting being told, "Who’s Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who that is. This is a stupid story." ABC's official response was that the reporting "did not meet our standards to air" due to lack of verified evidence, though Robach emphasized the interview itself was solid but held back for these external reasons.
ABC later clarified they "never stopped investigating" Epstein, pointing to a 2020 two-hour documentary and podcast they produced after public scrutiny intensified post-2019. However, Robach's frustration highlighted how elite connections delayed exposure of Epstein's network by years, allowing his activities to continue unchecked until his 2019 arrest.
No single individual is named as the sole "kibosh" figure—it's portrayed as a combination of institutional caution and external arm-twisting—but the Palace threats and Dershowitz's call are most directly cited as pivotal. This incident has fueled ongoing criticism of media self-censorship around powerful figures.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
6 |
1,563 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(11-19-2025, 08:31 AM)putnam6 Wrote: Of course Trump is dismissive. We are pulling evidence from cases already adjudicated and mostly hidden behind those rascally NDAs, there were NDAs for a reason. Both sides have juggled the hot potato; evidently, Trump's evidence of involvement wasnt too damaging, or it would have been used before. This seems highly plausible. But it's likely Israel/Mossad and friends, family in high places behind the NDAs Republicans, Democrats, whoever opens it up will have the stink on thier Presidency, thats was by design.
Tired of the speculation, open it, then let's move on. Felt the same about Bill and Monica after a certain point, and this is worse its been dangling for years.
Bottomline: how many FBI directors and prosecutors already know, AND didn't RELEASE IT BEFORE.
Why didnt Biden release it?
There's no new evidence for those in the know, it's only news to the GP
Nobody else wanted to deal with the shit storm
Asked and answered previously - Biden didn't release stuff about Epstein because Ghislaine Maxwell's case (as Epstein's accomplice) was still before the court. It was subjudice.
And Trump is playing a game of opening a new investigation into Epstein's (Democrat only) links because that's the only way he can block release of the files. The only caveat to prevent their release is if they are relevant to an ongoing investigation.
So, as long as there is some official investigation, Trump can prevent the release of the Epstein files. It's cynical, but true.
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

306 |
6,483 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(11-19-2025, 10:31 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: [Image: https://i.imgur.com/NHVPiZg.jpeg]
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/vRFBq5W.jpeg]
So once he signs the bill, then what?
It would be nice if our courts chimed in about the legal ramifications.
Does releasing the evidence make it easier or harder to prosecute?
Side note
Why is crypto crashing? just manipulation or something else
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

11-19-2025, 10:48 PM
This post was last modified: 11-19-2025, 10:50 PM by UltraBudgie. 
(11-19-2025, 08:31 AM)putnam6 Wrote: Tired of the speculation, open it, then let's move on. Felt the same about Bill and Monica after a certain point, and this is worse its been dangling for years.
But the truth about the blackmail plot with Bill and Monica is just starting to come out, earlier this year¹. These things take time to "go cold". Likely it will be the same with all the Epstein ties, a few decades from now. Unless reality is accelerating.
¹ https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-...r-pollard/
|