Trump and Epstein were great buddies

[WallFlowerActive]

Something is strange here with Trump's reversal.

Got tired of time being wasted.  Probably didn’t want years to get wasted like with the fake Russian dossier and fake allegations of golden showers.  Probably going to be another nothing burger.  

Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.

[andy06shake]

How about presenting actual evidence of crimes involving Trump instead of false assurances.

How about not tampering with the evidence and/or redacting your name?
 
It's all coming out in the wash now.
 
Even your beloved Trump says to lay the cards on the table.
 
I'm sure it will be presented for all to see soon enough.
 
And if he has nothing to worry about, he will be cleared and exonerated.  

[quintessentone]

How about presenting actual evidence of crimes involving Trump instead of false assurances.

They say "you are the company you keep". So of course Trump is being scrutinized because of his long friendship with Epstein and Trump called him a 'terrific guy', when Epstein was of use to him. It's warranted.

What Epstein said about Trump:
 

• Jeffrey Epstein reportedly called Donald Trump "dangerous" and described him as having "not one decent cell in his body" in an email sent in 2017
  
• The message was one of many email exchanges between Epstein and others released by the House Oversight committee earlier this week
  
• Trump's relationship with Epstein — who mentioned the president multiple times in messages over the years — has fallen under renewed scrutiny since the release of the emails
  

[WallFlowerActive]

It's all coming out in the wash now.

What’s coming out.  The reason you stated why the Biden administration didn’t act?

Possibly because they lacked cooperating witnesses, physical evidence, or legally solid cases to present.

Again.  Why for decades would state and federal prosecutors protect Trump before even being president.

[andy06shake]

What’s coming out.  The reason you stated why the Biden administration didn’t act?



Again.  Why for decades would state and federal prosecutors protect Trump before even being president.

You're the one mentioning Biden, Clinton, in an attempt to obfuscate away the fact that your POTUS was best friends with a convicted pedophile.

Again, the buck stops with Trump.

And it's not Biden that's running for the hills.

And its not Biden's name mentioned in the files 1000s of times either. 

Or tampering with the truth in an attempt to hide his part in it all, so....

[WallFlowerActive]

 

• Trump's relationship with Epstein — who mentioned the president multiple times in messages over the years — has fallen under renewed scrutiny since the release of the emails
  

The emails that people hid that Giuffe worked for Trump and Giuffe never made accusations concerning Trump.

As far as Trump being dangerous.  Like people claiming his first term he was going to start WW III, and this term he was going to collapse the economy.  Hasn’t happened yet despite the preexisting national deficit.  The deficit everyone seems to ignore.

[WallFlowerActive]

Again, the buck stops with Trump.

No.  If you think there is a conspiracy to hide criminal activity.  The accountability goes to decades of federal and state prosecutors that participated in that conspiracy to hide those crimes.

Again.  Why would decades of state and federal prosecutors protect Trump years before he would become president.

[quintessentone]

The emails that people hid that Giuffe worked for Trump and Giuffe never made accusations concerning Trump.

As far as Trump being dangerous.  Like people claiming his first term he was going to start WW III, and this term he was going to collapse the economy.  Hasn’t happened yet despite the preexisting national deficit.  The deficit everyone seems to ignore.

It's early days as to starting wars or what can be looked at as wars already in place by some, other than you.

How is he doing at reducing your national debt?

Trump's reversal in many areas shows he really doesn't know what he's doing.

[andy06shake]

No.  If you think there is a conspiracy to hide criminal activity.  The accountability goes to decades of federal and state prosecutors that participated in that conspiracy to hide those crimes.

Again.  Why would decades of state and federal prosecutors protect Trump years before he would become president.

No what?

The buck stops with Trump.

Deal with the facts.

As to the rest of that nonsense and attempt at obvious distraction. 

You have already had an answer.

Legal action depends on evidence and witness cooperation.

Many of the allegations surfaced later, and Epstein's operations were secretive.

Lack of charges before his presidency reflects insufficient evidence, not intentional shielding.

And legal delays aren't proof of personal protection.

[matafuchyou]

So when he calls on them to release the information....he is still worried? 

In a post on Truth Social, Trump said that he cares more about having Republicans “get BACK ON POINT” and focus on what the his administration has accomplished, such as securing the southern border, deporting criminal illegal aliens, and protecting women’s sports from transgender-identifying biological males.
 
“As I said on Friday night aboard Air Force One to the Fake News Media, House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files, because we have nothing to hide, and it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the
Great Success of the Republican Party, including our recent Victory on the Democrat ‘Shutdown,'” Trump said in his post.

The 'hoax' is that he was involved not that it did not happen.