11-17-2025, 06:41 AM
❮
❯
|
11-17-2025, 06:43 AM
(11-17-2025, 06:40 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Why would any federal or state prosecutors protect Trump for decades before even being president? Your obvious attempt at obfuscation aside. Possibly because they lacked cooperating witnesses, physical evidence, or legally solid cases to present. Your prosecutors act on provable charges. Not rumors.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
11-17-2025, 06:47 AM
(11-17-2025, 06:41 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Such as the Clintons and anyone else with ties to Epstein? Good, let them fall also. If they are guilty or implicated. The difference being that's not any sort of excuse. If Clinton turns out to be ""one of them"" so be it. Still won't shift any blame, Trump manages to accumulate down to evidence. And the buck still stops with him. Clinton's not your POTUS, and neither is Biden. Trump on the other hand...
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
11-17-2025, 06:53 AM
(11-17-2025, 06:43 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Your obvious attempt at obfuscation aside. So. What’s changed now in a justice system of innocent until proven guilty. So. All you have is character assassination and innuendo by many of the same people that pushed the false Russian Dossier and the lies concerning golden showers. Again, if past administrations and state prosecutors have been sitting on evidence where there was no reason to protect Trump, they also need to be held accountable. In your own words you want to character assassinate a person where there is arguably “lacked cooperating witnesses, physical evidence, or legally solid cases to present.”
11-17-2025, 06:55 AM
(11-17-2025, 06:20 AM)Truthhurts Wrote: I suspect that the released files will be significantly redacted under the pretext of national security. I hope that's not the case, but given it's Trump, he is likely up to something. And in doing so. People will simply see those redactions as an admission of guilt. I certainly hope the files are released unredacted, bar the victims' names. But im not holding my breath....
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
11-17-2025, 06:59 AM
(11-17-2025, 06:55 AM)andy06shake Wrote: And in doing so. It’s been addressed in other threads. Much of the evidence is Epstein kiddy porn videos. Do you understand what you really are asking?
11-17-2025, 07:01 AM
(11-17-2025, 06:53 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: So. What’s changed now in a justice system of innocent until proven guilty. So. All you have is character assassination and innuendo by many of the same people that pushed the false Russian Dossier and the lies concerning golden showers. LoL Yadda yadda yadda. It's not what i have you need to worry about. Nor is it my words that will count. Those 20,000+ pages with Trump's name all over them on the other hand.... Never mind the rest of the mounting evidence and nefarious shenanigans he's entangled and buried up to his neck regarding Epstein. Well, and once again, "fiat justitia ruat caelum"
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
11-17-2025, 07:03 AM
(11-17-2025, 06:55 AM)andy06shake Wrote: And in doing so. Something is strange here with Trump's reversal. He may release files that are unredacted but I'm suspecting not all files will be released or they will claim some files/pics/tapes never existed even when Epstein, Bannon and Wolff mentioned that they did exist. Trump will most likely then state that they had a smear campaign against him and what they have to say is a hoax. I also suspect some Israeli government officials also won't be in any of those files even after Epstein was deep in it with foreign governments.
"The only journey is the one within."
11-17-2025, 07:05 AM
(11-17-2025, 06:59 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: It’s been addressed in other threads. Much of the evidence is Epstein kiddy porn videos. Do you understand what you really are asking? That old chestnut? Nobody wants to watch it silly. Im sure there are proper authorities that will be forced to endure such torture, thus confirming what went on. Just because something is terrible and reprehensible in the extreme does not mean we should choose to ignore it exists. Do you understand how pathetic that argument actually is?
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|





