DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Today, lesbian gay and bisexual people have a new global organization
(10-13-2025, 07:36 PM)RazorV66 Wrote: Sperm=Man

Womb=Woman

I'll edit my post above to reflect that.

Yes - a physical act.

Being straight not required.
(10-13-2025, 07:30 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: Take your strawman of exclusivity out of the closet please.

So anything bisexual cant breed why?

The concept being many animals will have sex with BOTH. Both homosexual AND hetero tendencies.

Just because they like to play with the same gender, doesnt mean they can't also breed eventually.

Sometimes it might, but exclusivity seems the exception, not the rule, at least with our closest animal relatives. 

We tried to change the world to see that, to see how natural it is, but people got all snowflakey, cancel-prone, and the human species proved too pathologically repressed. So it backfired into some good old fashioned signs of evil.

But you cant stop a pendulum from giving us another chance eventually.

Woke Is Not Dead.  It just needs to get hit by a car and relieze it spent its life in denial and repression.

Like it has been stated, I don't care what or who you are.

But stating that it is "normal" is wrong because it isn't.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
(10-13-2025, 07:50 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: But stating that it is "normal" is wrong because it isn't.

Being wrong never stopped them. It's pretty simple. Normal is based on the majority of a species behavior. Such as it is not normal for bears, mountain lions, and sharks to attack people.

The majority of humans are heterosexual.
                                   
(10-13-2025, 07:55 PM)Unknownparadox Wrote: Being wrong never stopped them. It's pretty simple. Normal is based on the majority of a species behavior. Such as it is not normal for bears, mountain lions, and sharks to attack people.

The majority of humans are heterosexual.

And how quickly the discussion has become polluted with the leftist doctrine that animal behaviour shall be the baseline for human morality.

Arguing about what "normal" is: that is not normal. Don't let them pretend it is.
(10-13-2025, 08:04 PM)UltraBudgie Wrote: And how quickly the discussion has become polluted with the leftist doctrine that animal behaviour shall be the baseline for human morality.

Arguing about what "normal" is: that is not normal. Don't let them pretend it is.

Abnormal has a pejorative connotation. But that's not important to my point. Because it's technically correct (population wise).

But so is what I am about to say.

It is normal. Despite hitting this goddamn wall of god-given specialness and the anthropomorphic.

Several observed mammal species have a percentage of their population, whether it be 8% (Like wild rams), or over 90% (like some colonies of captive apes) that exhibit same sex behavior. 

Ergo the human species, god's special little animal, exhibiting a 10% or higher rate of homosexual tendencies, is NORMAL.

Because it conforms to the majority of other mammal species in t having a percentage. Thats how its normal. 

It would be abnormal if our species didnt have a certain percentage of its animals exhibiting homosexual behavior. Don't even need my "bisexual as apes" speculation. 

That argument doesnt need to pretend.

* though the song doesnt exactly track, it seemed fitting enough.
[Image: d8652277909c86508f3d24028130ce5e.jpg]
(10-13-2025, 08:04 PM)UltraBudgie Wrote: And how quickly the discussion has become polluted with the leftist doctrine that animal behaviour shall be the baseline for human morality.

Arguing about what "normal" is: that is not normal. Don't let them pretend it is.

That was debate-level thinking right there friend.

Paradigms are often misplaced and overlapped for the sake of explanation...
and then that explanation becomes new ground for bifurcation...

That's how OT begins.

Innocently, earnestly...

I think it's the conjunction of telegraphing a targeted closure in an argument (a sort of trigger fro a more refined argument - or a rage quit) ... and the surrender of intention of real dialogue... (emotional play engages)

kind of open-ended though...

since at that point you're arguing to "get the last impactful word in" (no one's fault... it's the nature of adapting to 'platformed' speech, instead of verbal dialogue which can simultaneously be more gentle, or even more violent... imagine that.

In the end, we have to admit that this is one huge open chain-letter.  It's almost miraculous how you all keep this from becoming a total wreck of a discussion... yes this is far from a perfect dialogue.... but I have always been under the impression that nothing's perfect... well... except my wife.
If those damn straight people would just quit having gay and trans kids, then the problem would be solved.
(10-13-2025, 09:20 PM)AnAlternateOpinion Wrote: If those damn straight people would just quit having gay and trans kids, then the problem would be solved.

It's not about individual will and dignity... it's about social responsibility... PARENT HARDER!
(10-13-2025, 09:30 PM)Maxmars Wrote: It's not about individual will and dignity... it's about social responsibility... PARENT HARDER!

What?

Are you saying parents are to blame for making a child gay or transgender?
(10-13-2025, 09:39 PM)ANNEE Wrote: What?

Are you saying parents are to blame for making a child gay or transgender?


Pardon my exclusion of sarcasm.... everyone wants to assign a cause to their own choices... and it's never ever them.

That's a whole OT topic... where does personal responsibility begin and consequences end.  My irony was lost...