The 'Laughable' WEF.

[Karl12]

Bit of a classic in case you missed it - Heritage Foundation President Dr. Kevin Roberts goes full scorched earth at the WEF.

Laughable’: Heritage Foundation Leader Bashes World Economic Forum During Davos Event


Heritage Foundation President Dr. Kevin Roberts bashed the World Economic Forum (WEF) for its “global elite” agenda while speaking at the forum, itself, on Thursday.

Roberts spoke alongside a panel of experts at a conference event in Davos, Switzerland, regarding what the future may hold under a future Republican administration.

Roberts criticized the WEF for being “a part of the problem” in pushing a global elitist agenda on the American population despite not being elected to do so, and called on the next Republican administration to reject all WEF proposals “wholesale.”


“I will be candid … the agenda that every single person member of the [future Republican] administration needs to have, is to compile a list of everything that’s ever been proposed at the [WEF], and object all of them wholesale,” Roberts told the WEF panel host during the conference. “Anyone not prepared to do that, and take away this power of the unelected bureaucrats and give it back to the American people, is unprepared to be a part of the next conservative administration.”

Rejecting all WEF agendas wholesale lol - should be an interesting new year

Will also be interesting to see the revelations of upcoming investigations into the FDA/CDC involving the WHO and wholesale big pharma corruption - especially regarding vested interests of specific families like the Rockefellers who play a huge 'behind the scenes' role in both.

Friendly reminder: The CDC is a vaccine company. The WHO is owned by the Rockefellers. The CDC also happen to own dozens of patents for vaccines which make them and the board members respective companies billions of dollars. This is a blatant conflict of interest making everything the CDC has to tell you very questionable at any time.

Regarding alarmism about 'climate change' also interesting to note that the Rockefellers have funded the vast majority of it (over 990 institutions, foundations and activist groups) - apparently they see it as their 'current opportunity'.





The Rockefellers created 990 "Climate Change" institutions, foundations, and activist groups





All this from a family who were actively funding the Nazis during WW2 (whilst Nazis were patronising the WEF) amidst claims the WEF leader's father was helping build atomic bombs for Hitler.

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

So I guess Trump isn't going to return to Davos for a third keynote speech? He gave one in 2018 and 2020.

F* The Heritage Foundation. A bunch of moonbat zealots that would turn our country to a disgusting theocracy where IVF is outlawed, women get chained to the kitchen to shoot out babies, and Christianity is compulsory. In so much hyperbolic wording.

I thought Project 2025 didn't matter, WITH NO affiliation to Trump, or relevance in the coming administration? Or America's governance. People said at length they are extremists with no influence. And I was crazy for thinking they'd play a role. Trump comfirmed it multiple times. So why should people care what fire and brimstone this wacko rants at his pervasive WEF boogeyman about?

I'd rather live under the "global elites" if The Heritage Foundation is any kind of savior to this world or wants to assume influence.

This is all The Heritage Foundation truly cares about, retaining their panophobic theocratic safespace because transgender people make them uncomfortable. And then screw over women...

The Family Agenda. The Secretary’s antidiscrimination policy statements should never conflate sex with gender identity or sexual orientation. Rather, the Secretary should proudly state that men and women are biological realities that are crucial to the advancement of life sciences and medical care and that married men and women are the ideal, natural family structure because all children have a right to be raised by the men and women who conceived them.

But what about the hyopthetical retiring military service member that plans on marrying her wife when her 20 years of service is complete so they can unfreeze 34 year old eggs and start an evil same sex family? And hope to have the legal spousal benefits still available. What say you, Heritage Foundation?

* Sorry to jump to my own paranoid conclusions, but the Heritage Foundation disturbs me. This rant is at them. I want as much separation between them and Trump and influence over my life as possible, like everyone said would happen.

[UltraBudgie]

The Rockefellers created 990 "Climate Change" institutions, foundations, and activist groups

So I expected this to be a wingnutty rant, but it turned out to be very coherent and detailed. Worth a read, if you haven't researched it before. Made me do a bit of a dive into the author, Elizabeth Nickson. She kind of seems like the real deal:

Elizabeth Nickson is a writer and journalist who has been published widely for the past twenty-five years. She was European Bureau Chief of Life Magazine in the late 80's and early 90's. During this time, she arranged photo stories and interviewed Nelson Mandela, Margaret Thatcher, the Dalai Lama, and dozens of other leaders, film and pop stars, politicians, and royalty, as well as torture victims, political prisoners and criminals. She initiated and co-ordinated the acquisition of Nelson Mandela's autobiography for Little Brown. Prior to her appointment at Life, she was a reporter at Time Magazine.

Nickson has also written for The (London) Sunday Times Magazine, The Guardian, The Observer, The Independent, Tatler, The Sunday Telegraph, Vogue, Saturday Night, Chatelaine, and Harper's Magazine. In 1994 Bloomsbury UK and Knopf Canada published her novel, The Monkey Puzzle Tree, which tells the story of the CIA mind control program in Montreal in the 50's and 60's.

In 1999, Elizabeth returned to Canada, and began writing for the Globe and Mail, as a contributing reviewer for the Books section. She then became a weekly columnist for the Globe, moving to the Comment Page of the National Post in 2000.

In 2005, she subdivided her forest property on Salt Spring Island, and built a carbon-neutral house.

This provided a window into the changes wrought by the environmental movement in land use and development. She drove 20,000 miles through rural America, documenting the very real disasters visited on rural dwellers by the environmental movement, conservation bureaucrats and once-great American foundations. Much of their work has caused unintended consequences which not only damage rural culture, the rural economy, but the ranges, forests, waterways and fields of America. The research became a book, published by Harper Collins in New York called "Eco-Fascists: How Radical Conservationists are Destroying Our Natural Heritage."

The work archived on Academia.edu is the policy-oriented version of Eco-Fascists, examining the Canadian iteration of this massive, and too often destructive, change.

https://independent.academia.edu/ElizabethNickson

Any opinions on her? There's links to some of her other articles there, too. I think I may I have read The Monkey Puzzle Tree back in the pre-9/11 world; the name seems familiar. Maybe its just that one of my neighbours has a monkey puzzle tree. They're weird.


On the subject of the WEF, I think it's important to think about them not as a policy generator themselves, but a place where the different wheels of power meet and mesh. They attempt to provide coherent expressions of policy that serve multiple agendas. So if the WEF is disregarded, that doesn't do a damn thing about the circles of influence it represents. They'd just find another way of representing themselves. It's an expression of the system, not the instigator.

[Sirius]

It's an expression of the system, not the instigator.

Institutions, foundations, and activist groups...like emergent complexity? You add those plus some kind of ingredient and out pops...rolls dice..."rockefellers"?

[UltraBudgie]

Institutions, foundations, and activist groups...like emergent complexity? You add those plus some kind of ingredient and out pops...rolls dice..."rockefellers"?

Sure. And Carnegie, Milner, Rhodes, Rothschild, whoever and whatever rabbit holes you want to dive down into -- there's so many branches you could look to, that's just one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_philanthropists

Here's a great Sunday read:

Special Committee to Investigate Tax Exempt Foundations | Reece Committee (1954)



Warning: It's over 2000 pages. Tip of the iceberg.

[Sirius]

Dang, had to go google what WEF is now. I regret everything

[Maxmars]

I once told my wife, much to her amusement my theory about everything "human society has evolved."

It speaks of simple observation, which fits perfectly for the exemplar in the WEF:

"[The WEF] is a simple thing...

6 guys in a room."

There's a lot more to it... but that's the hypothesis in it's purest form.

[Karl12]

So I expected this to be a wingnutty rant, but it turned out to be very coherent and detailed.

Worth a read, if you haven't researched it before.

Certainly interesting times and thanks for addressing the actual content (and links).

990 - what are the odds?

Lots more dodgy backstage climate shenanigans out there and really would recommend this VHS video where Rockefeller stooge Maurice Strong is openly discussing the WEF and the 'controlled demolition of first world economies'.

Also thought some extremely valid points were being raised in this full interview regarding the 1992 U.N. Rio Conference and wasn't that surprised to learn that the term 'sustainable development' (AKA 'the 'monopolization of the world's resources') was first popularized by author Gro Harlem Brundtland who wrote it as economic policy for Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission (of which she was a member).

Around 37:00 the author also explains how Podesta singlehandedly delivered (and implemented) the whole agenda package to America - pretty insane stuff.

Anyway when it comes to these fanatical, unaccountable and unelected groups like the WEF one of the most entertaining summations I've seen comes from Neil Oliver.













It really does boggle the mind how groups like the WEF (and the WHO) are permitted 'diplomatic immunity' from the Swiss Government - especially considering they are mostly privately financed, pay no taxes and are quite clearly 'subversive to the order of the Swiss Constitution'.

[Karl12]

Institutions, foundations, and activist groups...like emergent complexity? You add those plus some kind of ingredient and out pops...rolls dice..."rockefellers"?

Yes mate looks like the family are also at the roots of Nazi eugenics and some of the new proposals coming out of the Rockefeller's 'Hastings Centre' (and 'WEF Future of Health Care Committee') are truly insane, inhuman and horrific.

The Institute received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next several years. Leading the Institute, once again, was Hitler's medical henchman Ernst Rüdin. Rüdin's organization became a prime director and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on Jews, Gypsies and others.

The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics

(Scroll Down)

Not to go on about it but looks like many folks have been ringing the alarm bells about this family for decades - here's an example from a U.S. Congressman back in the 1970's.

• "The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

U.S. Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets.

Also this warning from the Mayor of New York back in 1922.

• "The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business".

New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922.

[Karl12]

Dang, had to go google what WEF is now. I regret everything

Yes we've all been there mate.

Looks like the WEF's 'great reset' was actually first launched by King Charles and there's a good video about the chap here.

Also turns out the World Economic Forum (originally known as the 'European Management Forum') held their 1973 Davos manifesto meeting directly under the patronage of.. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands who was a card carrying Nazi.



34:30



Anyway looks like a lot of people are waking up to these jokers and 'The Grand Refusal' to 'the great reset' is becoming a major thing.

From the Mises Institute's recent event in Birmingham, Alabama, dedicated to the global threat of "The Great Reset". Recorded on April 22, 2023.

In recent years, Americans have suffered from the horrors of covid tyranny, government-directed corporate censorship, and now our current banking crisis. The global elite have never been more obvious in their intentions for the greater control over society. Their aim is further consolidation of power and wealth into the hands of radical ideologues and to transform almost every aspect of human society.

They are not subtle in their ambition. They call it The Great Reset.