TH2UD

[Hanslune]

 

[Hanslune]

Hey Harte do you remember in 1996 when you and I snuck into the World Archaeological Council Joint Operations Bureau's session where they were thinking about moving Menkaure's pyramid so that Bauval's idea wouldn't seem so important?

We had dressed all in black and Harte and I took in a stone tablet with a copy of The Hanslune-Harte Ultimate Dumb chart or TH2UD index for evaluating ideas about the Ancient Egyptian civilization. Version .045. It was rejected of course but we tried again in Detroit in 1998, the WACJOBs fourth conference I believe.

[Heiden]

 

[Zaphod58]

***Attention***

The next person to throw an insult will be post banned. 

Do not reply to this post.

[chr0naut]

And 1 billion points for continuing to parrot the main stream narrative. 

The best part of it all -- you look dumb, in an attempt to make us look dumb. 

While you're at it, please explain to us how this was built. I'm waiting.....

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/KPcq7fM.jpeg]

The individual stones were compounded and poured into moulds built upon the last ones.

Once the 'stones' had set sufficiently, the outer scaffold and mouldings could be disassembled and reused, due to limited availability of wooden sheeting. This is why it was done as a block-by-block pour, rather than a relatively continuous wall, such as is evident in modern dam concreted walls.

[Harte]

The individual stones were compounded and poured into moulds built upon the last ones.

Once the 'stones' had set sufficiently, the outer scaffold and mouldings could be disassembled and reused, due to limited availability of wooden sheeting. This is why it was done as a block-by-block pour, rather than a relatively continuous wall, such as is evident in modern dam concreted walls.

That doesn't explain this:



Harte

[Hanslune]

The individual stones were compounded and poured into moulds built upon the last ones.

Once the 'stones' had set sufficiently, the outer scaffold and mouldings could be disassembled and reused, due to limited availability of wooden sheeting. This is why it was done as a block-by-block pour, rather than a relatively continuous wall, such as is evident in modern dam concreted walls.

Ah but the problem with that for the pyramids is that the stones are irregular, show tool tool marks on them and contain intact fossils within, and the quarries show they were bashed out in blocks too. https://i.imgur.com/zOdtWg1.jpg, https://i.imgur.com/u6iTd6A.jpg, https://i.imgur.com/RMTkLMf.jpg. Now the same applies to the Inca except for being bashed out, their quarry/rubble site shows stones were cut out or just removed whole, which accounts for the very irregular style, and yes the limestone also contains fossils too. A problem toowith the Inca, is the Spanish used them as masons - and noted their expertise - in standard masonry and no sight of 'pouring'. None of the chroniclers of Inca lore mentioned it either - but did mention their skill at masonry.

[Keymaster]

Egyptology isn't deeply concerned about Incan Archaeology....

Egyptology isn't concerned with ANY archeology.

Not that it matters, since archeology isn't science, it's philosophy.

How about you explain in detail how the great pyramid was built in 20 years, according to Herodotus?

First start with how a block (with the average weight of 2.5 tons) can be cut, transported, and placed every 15 minutes without the aid of machinery, 24 hours a day for the full 20 years.
There isn't an engineer on the planet that will even venture to tell you how that would be possible, but I bet you know, right...lmao.

It wouldn't be possible to do it using Styrofoam blocks two girls could carry, but go ahead and tell us how they managed it.

And I'll do my best not to call you and everyone pushing that narrative, a liar.
Or you can just insult me and wait for the garbage tier moderation to take affect and remove any post that disagrees with you.

[Keymaster]

Hey Harte do you remember in 1996 when you and I snuck into the World Archaeological Council Joint Operations Bureau's session where they were thinking about moving Menkaure's pyramid so that Bauval's idea wouldn't seem so important?

We had dressed all in black and Harte and I took in a stone tablet with a copy of The Hanslune-Harte Ultimate Dumb chart or TH2UD index for evaluating ideas about the Ancient Egyptian civilization. Version .045. It was rejected of course but we tried again in Detroit in 1998, the WACJOBs fourth conference I believe.

The only whack jobs walking around are mainstream egyptologists.
The explanations this clownshow gives for obvious anomalous evidence is laughable at best, utter lies at the worst.

[Hanslune]

Egyptology isn't concerned with ANY archeology.

Not that it matters, since archeology isn't science, it's philosophy.

How about you explain in detail how the great pyramid was built in 20 years, according to Herodotus?

First start with how a block (with the average weight of 2.5 tons) can be cut, transported, and placed every 15 minutes without the aid of machinery, 24 hours a day for the full 20 years.
There isn't an engineer on the planet that will even venture to tell you how that would be possible, but I bet you know, right...lmao.

It wouldn't be possible to do it using Styrofoam blocks two girls could carry, but go ahead and tell us how they managed it.

And I'll do my best not to call you and everyone pushing that narrative, a liar.
Or you can just insult me and wait for the garbage tier moderation to take affect and remove any post that disagrees with you.

A bunch of strawmen arguments - I don't follow any of those parameters  - which you would have known if you asked me. Rather foolish of you isn't it? Question what evidence do you have as to WHEN they started building it?