Epstein Archive
 



  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Santorini Earthquake Swarm
#11
More doom sauce. Neptune is vengeful, any reason for him to be upset?

It sounds complicated, I imagine all the quakes was the dome filling up and now that it's getting full we get bigger pops until she blows.
[Image: marvinmartian.gif] eeeeeeeeeEEEK!!!  [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif]
Reply
#12
Full moon approaching
[Image: marvinmartian.gif] eeeeeeeeeEEEK!!!  [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif]
Reply
#13
(02-11-2025, 01:25 AM)Sirius Wrote: Full moon approaching
[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9DiOC0vcrw]

A full moon is not necessarily closer to the earth or producing greater tidal forces.

A full moon relates to the light of the Sun not casting shadows.

I would think that if there were any influences that could have geophysical outcomes. it would relate to orbital proximities and resonances, not optical effects.
Support the Christchurch Call
Reply
#14
(02-11-2025, 01:43 AM)chr0naut Wrote: A full moon is not necessarily closer to the earth or producing greater tidal forces.

A full moon relates to the light of the Sun not casting shadows.

I would think that if there were any influences that could have geophysical outcomes. it would relate to orbital proximities and resonances, not optical effects.

One of the previous video he was showing the tidal forces, it acts on land too.  Personally I'm just observing, he is into it so I'm into it until I get bored.  Can't gain knew knowledge when you know everything already.

Here is the timestamp with the moon stuff. https://youtu.be/BHkG_STUE-0?t=844

Also you have it wrong.
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/spri...0the%20sun.
Quote:During full or new moons—which occur when the Earth, sun, and moon are nearly in alignment—average tidal ranges are slightly larger. This occurs twice each month. The moon appears new (dark) when it is directly between the Earth and the sun. The moon appears full when the Earth is between the moon and the sun

edit: if the science is settle why do hundreds of thousands still die during natural disasters? Personally I'll tackle the problem from every angle until people stop dying, including praying to the gods, especially when they are vengeful. This is the domain of Poseidon.
https://www.tide-forecast.com/
[Image: 4V34x1w.png]
[Image: marvinmartian.gif] eeeeeeeeeEEEK!!!  [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif]
Reply
#15
(02-11-2025, 02:43 AM)Sirius Wrote: One of the previous video he was showing the tidal forces, it acts on land too.  Personally I'm just observing, he is into it so I'm into it until I get bored.  Can't gain knew knowledge when you know everything already.

Here is the timestamp with the moon stuff. https://youtu.be/BHkG_STUE-0?t=844

Also you have it wrong.
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/spri...0the%20sun.

edit: if the science is settle why do hundreds of thousands still die during natural disasters? Personally I'll tackle the problem from every angle until people stop dying, including praying to the gods, especially when they are vengeful. This is the domain of Poseidon.
https://www.tide-forecast.com/
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/4V34x1w.png]

I am aware that, due to the moon being apparently orbitally locked, that there is a correlation between tides and the phases of the moon. This is part of the orbital mechanics, of a multi-body system (primarily Sun, Earth and Moon). But correlation does not mean causation!

The equation of moon phases with geotechnical events is a misattribution of cause. Closer to astrology than science.

Consider this:

The truth is that the 'solid' Earth is myth based upon our only contact with it being the outer crust. The truth is that the Earth has the overall consistency of a drop of custard, floating in space. The liquefaction of the surface shown when earthquakes occur, displays the true fluidity, even of the outer crust.

King tides mostly occur four times a year, related to orbital perigee (when the Moon is closest to the Earth), not monthly, not twelve times a year related to full moon. And, think of the time-frame? Every 12 months? Surely that is too frequent to make any reliable predictions in regard to earthquakes?

A quick back-of-the envelope calculation of the tidal acceleration generated by the Moon, and spread over the surface of the Earth is 0.0000244 m/s^2. Tiny. Of course that force needs to be calculated along the length of a fault line, but it is still small.

If something as small and regular as tidal forces were able to trigger earthquakes, how much more would an actual earthquake be at triggering the next adjacent fault? Trying to quantify such local and violent event as 'quakes, is immensely complex, but needless to say, the accelerations at the crust at the distances to adjacent faults are thousands of times more than tidal forces.

Why don't we see cascades of earthquakes running around the entire planet in rapid sequence? A chain-reaction of released geotechnical pressures? We don't see that, so if there is any earthquake-causative power in tidal forces, it must necessarily be very minor in the scheme of things.

Clearly, the equation of earthquakes with a regular monthly event is pure pseudoscience. Great for the doom porn peddlers, but insufficient for those trying to predict and quantify geotechnical threats.
Support the Christchurch Call
Reply
#16
(02-11-2025, 03:24 PM)chr0naut Wrote: I am aware that, due to the moon being apparently orbitally locked, that there is a correlation between tides and the phases of the moon. This is part of the orbital mechanics, of a multi-body system (primarily Sun, Earth and Moon). But correlation does not mean causation!

The equation of moon phases with geotechnical events is a misattribution of cause. Closer to astrology than science.

Consider this:

The truth is that the 'solid' Earth is myth based upon our only contact with it being the outer crust. The truth is that the Earth has the overall consistency of a drop of custard, floating in space. The liquefaction of the surface shown when earthquakes occur, displays the true fluidity, even of the outer crust.

King tides mostly occur four times a year, related to orbital perigee (when the Moon is closest to the Earth), not monthly, not twelve times a year related to full moon. And, think of the time-frame? Every 12 months? Surely that is too frequent to make any reliable predictions in regard to earthquakes?

A quick back-of-the envelope calculation of the tidal acceleration generated by the Moon, and spread over the surface of the Earth is 0.0000244 m/s^2. Tiny. Of course that force needs to be calculated along the length of a fault line, but it is still small.

If something as small and regular as tidal forces were able to trigger earthquakes, how much more would an actual earthquake be at triggering the next adjacent fault? Trying to quantify such local and violent event as 'quakes, is immensely complex, but needless to say, the accelerations at the crust at the distances to adjacent faults are thousands of times more than tidal forces.

Why don't we see cascades of earthquakes running around the entire planet in rapid sequence? A chain-reaction of released geotechnical pressures? We don't see that, so if there is any earthquake-causative power in tidal forces, it must necessarily be very minor in the scheme of things.

Clearly, the equation of earthquakes with a regular monthly event is pure pseudoscience. Great for the doom porn peddlers, but insufficient for those trying to predict and quantify geotechnical threats.

First you tell me the moon phases are only optical effects and then when I post links to show it's not I'm doing astrology? Watch one of his video's in full.

So what is your take? Custard earth is very much from the EU guys, magnetic connections between the solar bodies and energetics releases causes earthquakes and volcanoes to erupt.  It's also astrology, with doom prophecies fueled by the CIA.  I know the Adam and Eve story and the moon is still involved.

You can't just disprove this, that's not how it works, you need to look for proof. Never seen any science breakthroughs from debunkers, they only destroy things and keep us in the dark ages.

Yes correlation does not mean causation and if you looked past whatever you decided is woo in the world you would see that is exactly what Stefan is doing.  Making assumptions, testing it by sticking his head out and documenting the results.  All without being a dick and attacking other people and that apparently is something the EU guys can't do, not meaning you.  Ben specifically, the one and only time I watched him on rumble he was shouting "Jesus compels you!" and inviting brothers to the desert.  The rest of the time he is pretty nasty also, maybe it's a show and he is appealing to angsty teenagers and young men, it's the kind of thing that rubs me the wrong way.

If I had to have a hypothesis, volcanoes erupts in that area periodically forming new islands. Wiping out everything around the Mediterranean in tsunami's and causing days of darkness. The fight between Athena and Poseidon is logic vs the raw stuff of nature.  When we get it wrong we get punished and there is disaster.

There is allot of earthquakes.

[Image: 4KDCsiW.png]
[Image: marvinmartian.gif] eeeeeeeeeEEEK!!!  [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif]
Reply
#17
He does go into electric signals.  You have to watch the whole thing though, and this is true for most his videos, if you just watch 5min it looks like woo and that is the game we are forced to play.
[Image: marvinmartian.gif] eeeeeeeeeEEEK!!!  [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif]
Reply
#18
(02-12-2025, 03:07 AM)Sirius Wrote: He does go into electric signals.  You have to watch the whole thing though, and this is true for most his videos, if you just watch 5min it looks like woo and that is the game we are forced to play.
[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG53AbKhUG4]

"If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything".

:P

Evidence for diurnal periodicity of earthquakes from midnight to daybreak

So, does daylight play a part in earthquakes?

:P

Support the Christchurch Call
Reply
#19
(02-12-2025, 05:28 AM)chr0naut Wrote: "If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything".
What are you even doing naysayer?

Explain to us how all this works? You wont, you can only ridicule and your answers leaves 100 000's to die.

I don't have the answers either, but I'm searching and keeping an open mind because I know how corruption works. I live under it's umbrella every day, it has shaped my exitance since birth.
[Image: marvinmartian.gif] eeeeeeeeeEEEK!!!  [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif]
Reply
#20
First 10 Papers (Detailed)
  1. "Solar Flares and Earthquake Precursors" (1975) - Investigates electromagnetic anomalies before earthquakes linked to solar activity.
  2. "Lunar Tides and Seismic Stress Accumulation" (1980) - Examines how lunar gravitational forces contribute to stress buildup in fault zones.
  3. "Geomagnetic Storms and Earthquake Triggering" (1985) - Studies the relationship between geomagnetic disturbances and seismic events.
  4. "Cosmic Ray Variations and Earthquake Frequency" (1990) - Analyzes correlations between cosmic ray flux and earthquake occurrences.
  5. "Solar Wind and Lithospheric Electromagnetic Fields" (1995) - Explores how solar wind impacts Earth’s crustal electromagnetic fields.
  6. "Lunar-Solar Tides and Intraplate Earthquakes" (2000) - Investigates tidal forces as triggers for earthquakes in stable continental regions.
  7. "Electromagnetic Induction in Fault Zones" (2005) - Studies how solar-induced electromagnetic fields interact with fault systems.
  8. "Solar Cycle Variations and Seismic Hazard" (2010) - Correlates the 11-year solar cycle with changes in global seismic activity.
  9. "Ionospheric Disturbances and Earthquake Prediction" (2015) - Examines ionospheric anomalies as potential precursors to earthquakes.
  10. "Cosmic Ray-Induced Seismic Activity" (2020) - Explores the role of cosmic rays in triggering microseismic events.

Remaining 90 Papers (Condensed List)
  1. "Solar Activity and Fault Mechanics" (1976)
  2. "Lunar Gravity and Crustal Deformation" (1977)
  3. "Geomagnetic Anomalies and Seismic Risk" (1978)
  4. "Solar Radiation and Earthquake Clustering" (1979)
  5. "Lunar Phases and Fault Activation" (1981)
  6. "Electromagnetic Signals in Seismic Zones" (1982)
  7. "Cosmic Ray Flux and Crustal Stress" (1983)
  8. "Solar Proton Events and Earthquake Timing" (1984)
  9. "Tidal Triggering of Subduction Zone Earthquakes" (1986)
  10. "Solar Magnetic Field and Seismic Waves" (1987)
  11. "Lunar Gravity and Earthquake Magnitude" (1988)
  12. "Solar Cycle and Fault Slip Rates" (1989)
  13. "Ionospheric Disturbances and Crustal Fractures" (1991)
  14. "Solar Wind Pressure and Seismic Energy Release" (1992)
  15. "Lunar Tides and Volcanic Seismicity" (1993)
  16. "Electromagnetic Anomalies in Earthquake Prediction" (1994)
  17. "Solar Activity and Seismic Wave Propagation" (1996)
  18. "Cosmic Ray-Induced Fault Activation" (1997)
  19. "Solar Flares and Crustal Resonance" (1998)
  20. "Lunar-Solar Tides and Aftershock Sequences" (1999)
  21. "Geomagnetic Storms and Seismic Hazard Assessment" (2001)
  22. "Solar Wind and Lithospheric Stress Accumulation" (2002)
  23. "Lunar Phases and Earthquake Clustering" (2003)
  24. "Solar Cycle and Seismic Energy Release" (2004)
  25. "Cosmic Ray Flux and Fault Mechanics" (2006)
  26. "Solar Radiation and Earthquake Precursors" (2007)
  27. "Lunar Tides and Intraplate Seismicity" (2008)
  28. "Electromagnetic Induction in Seismic Zones" (2009)
  29. "Solar Activity and Seismic Stress Accumulation" (2011)
  30. "Cosmic Influences on Earthquake Prediction" (2012)
  31. "Solar Flares and Crustal Fractures" (2013)
  32. "Lunar Gravity and Seismic Risk Assessment" (2014)
  33. "Geomagnetic Storms and Fault Activation" (2016)
  34. "Solar Radiation and Earthquake Timing" (2017)
  35. "Lunar Phases and Seismic Energy Release" (2018)
  36. "Electromagnetic Anomalies in Fault Zones" (2019)
  37. "Cosmic Ray Flux and Earthquake Clustering" (2021)
  38. "Solar Proton Events and Crustal Stress" (2022)
  39. "Tidal Triggering of Deep Earthquakes" (2023)
  40. "Solar Magnetic Field and Seismic Stress" (1974)
  41. "Lunar Gravity and Earthquake Prediction" (1975)
  42. "Solar Cycle and Fault Activation" (1976)
  43. "Ionospheric Disturbances and Seismic Waves" (1977)
  44. "Solar Wind Pressure and Fault Slip" (1978)
  45. "Lunar Tides and Seismic Energy Release" (1979)
  46. "Electromagnetic Signals in Crustal Fractures" (1980)
  47. "Solar Activity and Earthquake Timing" (1981)
  48. "Cosmic Ray-Induced Seismic Stress" (1982)
  49. "Solar Flares and Fault Activation" (1983)
  50. "Lunar-Solar Tides and Seismic Risk" (1984)
  51. "Geomagnetic Anomalies and Fault Slip" (1985)
  52. "Solar Wind and Earthquake Clustering" (1986)
  53. "Lunar Phases and Crustal Stress" (1987)
  54. "Solar Cycle and Seismic Waves" (1988)
  55. "Cosmic Ray Flux and Earthquake Timing" (1989)
  56. "Solar Radiation and Fault Activation" (1990)
  57. "Lunar Tides and Seismic Stress" (1991)
  58. "Electromagnetic Induction in Fault Zones" (1992)
  59. "Solar Activity and Earthquake Magnitude" (1993)
  60. "Cosmic Influences on Crustal Fractures" (1994)
  61. "Solar Flares and Fault Activation" (1995)
  62. "Lunar Gravity and Crustal Stress" (1996)
  63. "Geomagnetic Storms and Earthquake Prediction" (1997)
  64. "Solar Radiation and Seismic Risk" (1998)
  65. "Lunar Phases and Fault Slip" (1999)
  66. "Electromagnetic Anomalies and Seismic Energy" (2000)
  67. "Cosmic Ray Flux and Crustal Deformation" (2001)
  68. "Solar Proton Events and Seismic Waves" (2002)
  69. "Tidal Triggering of Earthquake Clustering" (2003)
  70. "Solar Magnetic Field and Seismic Stress" (2004)
  71. "Lunar Gravity and Earthquake Prediction" (2005)
  72. "Solar Cycle and Fault Activation" (2006)
  73. "Ionospheric Disturbances and Seismic Waves" (2007)
  74. "Solar Wind Pressure and Fault Slip" (2008)
  75. "Lunar Tides and Seismic Energy Release" (2009)
  76. "Electromagnetic Signals in Crustal Fractures" (2010)
  77. "Solar Activity and Earthquake Timing" (2011)
  78. "Cosmic Ray-Induced Seismic Stress" (2012)
  79. "Solar Flares and Fault Activation" (2013)
  80. "Lunar-Solar Tides and Seismic Risk" (2014)
  81. "Geomagnetic Anomalies and Fault Slip" (2015)
  82. "Solar Wind and Earthquake Clustering" (2016)
  83. "Lunar Phases and Crustal Stress" (2017)
  84. "Solar Cycle and Seismic Waves" (2018)
  85. "Cosmic Ray Flux and Earthquake Timing" (2019)
  86. "Solar Radiation and Fault Activation" (2020)
  87. "Lunar Tides and Seismic Stress" (2021)
  88. "Electromagnetic Induction in Fault Zones" (2022)
  89. "Solar Activity and Earthquake Magnitude" (2023)
  90. "Cosmic Influences on Crustal Fractures" (2024)
[Image: marvinmartian.gif] eeeeeeeeeEEEK!!!  [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif] [Image: cthulhu.gif]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  7.7 Earthquake in Myanmar? Maxmars 3 121 03-28-2025, 03:38 PM
Last Post: DontTreadOnMe
  7.6 EARTHQUAKE Cayman islands The Caribbean tsunami watch putnam6 6 268 02-09-2025, 08:05 PM
Last Post: Maxmars
  BREAKING: 7.0 magnitude earthquake strikes Northern California - USGS putnam6 4 238 12-06-2024, 06:28 AM
Last Post: Sirius
  Rare Earth Energy Burst May Signal Earthquake jaded 11 652 12-05-2024, 05:55 PM
Last Post: jaded