DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Royal Nonce Thread.
#31
(02-13-2026, 09:27 AM)andy06shake Wrote: [Image: https://i.imgur.com/uNRqn1l.jpeg]

What's the old saying?

"Takes one to know one."  Thumbdown



Birds of a feather stick together
[Image: VYRH3Th.png]
#32
(02-13-2026, 12:14 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Depends on the facts and evidence.

She is not exactly popular over here.

I thought she divorced him to get him away from her daughters?
But perhaps that is speculation on my part?
#33
(02-13-2026, 07:55 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Back in the day do remember watching Prince Andrew on Jimmy Saville's TV show thinking they were both decent enough people who did a lot of work for charity.

Boy was I wrong about that.

Turns out Saville was Britain's worst pedo-nonce necrophile and Andrew has now been exposed for crimes against children in the Epstein files.

If you can stomach it there's some extensive research here about Saville and all the countless ways he was connected to the Royal family.

There's also this recent UK interview with discussion about Andrew being hauled in front of the House of Commons to answer for his crimes and talk of potential corpses on Royal estates.




[Video: https://youtu.be/-sB3COXVEm8]




Suppose pathological deviants like Saville got away with it for so long because people simply did not want to address the reality of the subject matter - hopefully things are starting to change.

Pedo-nonce connections to Epstein, Saville, Andrew etc. are all covered below - also turns out King Charles has some extremely disturbing 'affiliations' and they are directly addressed from 20:00.




[Video: https://youtu.be/5yMnJTvMrR4]

I won't draw this out and nit-pick about politics and semantics.

If it has been proven that ANYONE has been sexually involved with children, 

Then shoot them.

QED


(quod erat demonstrandum)
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
#34
(02-13-2026, 04:45 PM)angelchemuel Wrote: the Fabians/TC etc, don't want monarchy anywhere, it totally goes against their agenda.


Fair point Jane - maybe he wants it dissolved but Charles is absolutely involved at a fundamental level with long term UN/WEF agendas.

If we look at the Fabians then they have the exact same goals and even the same financial backers (IMF).

Also thought this was a really good article as it shows the Fabian's attitude towards the UN:


"For us world government is the final objective - and the United Nations the chosen instrument".


Would say King Charles 'lifelong friendship' with Dutch Royal (Nazi SS Officer) Prince Bernhard also deserves a mention as he founded Bilderberg.

Bilderberg (and the Royal Institute of International Affairs) are right at the heart of all this UN/NWO malarkey.


• To keep on thread topic funding for many of these players came from the Bauer family (Rothschild) who Epstein claimed he represented.

Beer
#35
(02-13-2026, 05:31 PM)Maxmars Wrote: I doubt you need me to say so, but I have no special regard, or antipathy for these people beyond how they manifest in the world..


They definitely seem to be doing a lot of manifesting mate and we all know about the future plans for babies under the anti-human Rockefeller and WEF groups (funnily enough Epstein held close ties with both).

Regarding Charles involvement with the WEF also looks like his father held profoundly misanthropic views.

Here's Phillip insinuating he wants to come back as a 'deadly virus' to kill people.


From 1:00


Both Phillip, Charles and Andrew were 'best mates' with Saville and (like Epstein) he also held close ties with the Pope.

Saville echoes Phillip's views here when he actually states that 'all children should be eaten at birth'.

Don't know if you've ever suffered through this documentary but (knowing what we do now) it has to be one the most truly bizarre and disturbing things ever to air on British television.
#36
(02-13-2026, 01:01 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: I don't know English law so IRe'm asking.


Regarding Royalty there's some interesting speculation below about how Charles is 'completely immune to prosecution' - also some comments about 'wealth'.





Beer
#37
(02-14-2026, 08:46 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Regarding Royalty there's some interesting speculation below about how Charles is 'completely immune to prosecution' - also some comments about 'wealth'.


[Video: https://youtu.be/4pUUSyYON2c]

Beer

Nice one, and I'll point out that if you can be forced to pay taxes on land you don't really own it, you only hold a 'deed' from the actual owner. The video claims that by Commonwealth land law the crown actually 'owns' all of Canada, Australia, etc. Similar to claiming that due to eminent domain the US government actually 'owns' the entire country. I guess that would make the National Parks a form of collateral against the debt.

But true enough though, in addition to the Crown Estates, land holding, art collections, etc., the royal family is very wealthy. And of course, power is its own currency.

As to 'above the law', well that is the very definition of sovereign. When in the form of a person, the law cannot be superior to them. The privilege of kings. Only applies to the current seat-warmer though, not the rest of the family.
#38
(02-14-2026, 09:16 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: Nice one, and I'll point out that if you can be forced to pay taxes on land you don't really own it, you only hold a 'deed' from the actual owner.


Thanks for the feedback mate and am not that clued up on 'law' - do remember the JP Morgan chief calling for 'eminent domain' seizures for 'wind farms' though - what a wanker.

Anyway regarding Britain's apparent nonce problem looks like the government is full of them.







Quote:In this video, we examine a growing pattern of sexual misconduct scandals, criminal investigations, and controversial political appointments connected to figures across UK government and party structures. From councillors and MPs facing serious allegations, to historic safeguarding failures and controversial peerage decisions, this investigation looks at the timeline, the connections, and the questions many people feel still haven’t been fully answered.

We analyse documented cases, tribunal findings, official reports, and publicly reported investigations to explore whether these scandals represent isolated incidents — or something more systemic.

Beer
#39
Starmer responsible for not prosecuting Saville.






He also didn't prosecute this one.


#40
For those wanting to keep track of 'lies' from Andrew there's a new video below.

It also covers how Epstein got 'tipped off' about the 2005 police raid on his Palm Beach mansion.

It's also rather convenient that the FBI 'lost' all the evidence from Epstein's Manhattan safe back in 2019 (see 1:00).







Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Prince Andrew Stripped of Royal Titles FlyersFan 203 8,370 11-02-2025, 08:24 AM
Last Post: angelchemuel