Royal Nonce Thread.

[Karl12]

Back in the day do remember watching Prince Andrew on Jimmy Saville's TV show thinking they were both decent enough people who did a lot of work for charity.

Boy was I wrong about that.

Turns out Saville was Britain's worst pedo-nonce necrophile and Andrew has now been exposed for crimes against children in the Epstein files.

If you can stomach it there's some extensive research here about Saville and all the countless ways he was connected to the Royal family.

There's also this recent UK interview with discussion about Andrew being hauled in front of the House of Commons to answer for his crimes and talk of potential corpses on Royal estates.










Suppose pathological deviants like Saville got away with it for so long because people simply did not want to address the reality of the subject matter - hopefully things are starting to change.

Pedo-nonce connections to Epstein, Saville, Andrew etc. are all covered below - also turns out King Charles has some extremely disturbing 'affiliations' and they are directly addressed from 20:00.

Now that Randy Andy has been exposed as an Epstein-associated degenerate, even the most dyed-in-the-wool defenders of the British royal family are starting to question their fealty to the House of Windsor.

But do you know just how many pedophiles have personally mentored and advised King Charles himself? Strap in, because you're about to learn just how deep the royal rabbit hole really goes.

Extra Link

[andy06shake]

What's the old saying?

"Takes one to know one." 

[Kurokage]

Andrew's titles and 'privilege' have been removed, it's now time for the police to investigate and possibly prosecute him. 

Anyone named (globally) as a co-conspirator and found to have abused any of Epstein's trafficked girls should face prison time. Then go after those that enabled him to commit these crimes.

[quintessentone]

Andrew's titles and 'privilege' have been removed, it's now time for the police to investigate and prosecute him.

Anyone named (globally) as a co-conspirator and found to have abused any of Epstein's trafficked girls should face prison time. Then go after those that enabled him to commit these crimes.

It's the old story, prosecute/blame the sex worker/victim (whether coerced, trafficked or not), the traffickers, but never the 'John' even though buying sex is illegal.

"In short, the legal system often prioritizes the trafficker and victim, while the John remains hidden due to lack of resources, societal stigma, and a legal framework that fails to treat demand as a serious criminal issue." (LLM)

https://www.bangordailynews.com/2012/10/...ostitutes/

Without the demand there would be no sex trafficking.

"Sex buyers are the primary catalyst, fueling the entire system.  Research shows that while only about six percent of men purchase sex annually, a small subset of frequent buyers accounts for nearly 75 percent of transactions. This concentrated demand incentivizes traffickers to recruit and exploit victims, often targeting those with histories of abuse, poverty, or homelessness. The demand also shapes the nature of exploitation—increasingly, buyers seek younger victims, leading to a rise in child sex trafficking." (LLM)

https://tatnonprofit.org/addressing-demand/

It seems as if they want to give the 'Johns' a slap on the wrist.

[bastion]

Back in the day do remember watching Prince Andrew on Jimmy Saville's TV show thinking they were both decent enough people who did a lot of work for charity.

Boy was I wrong about that.

I don't see what all the fuss is about. When I was five Jim fixed it for me to milk a cow blindfolded.

Press/public have known Andy was pretty dodgy for a few years but the revelations of using lolita express to  traffick a kid to Buckingham Palace are beyond worst nightmares plius seems the dirt is getting worse by the hour.

He's also quilty of major national security breaches/treason by leaking MI6 'five year plan' intel reports on Afghanistan and other countries (all countries including UK conduct industrial expionage and home sec grants access to the files to major employers/universities as a strong economy is on par with defence to maintain national security).

[Karl12]

What's the old saying?

Also 'birds of a feather flock together' and one of the most consistent factors (especially with Saville) seems to be 'charity work'.

Suppose children's charities are a wonderful smokescreen for nonces and there's some info below about Andrew and the NSPCC.







Other Epstein pals like Bill Clinton and Peter Madelson also pop up in that NSPCC video.

[UltraBudgie]

It's the old story, prosecute/blame the sex worker/victim (whether coerced, trafficked or not), the traffickers, but never the 'John' even though buying sex is illegal.

"In short, the legal system often prioritizes the trafficker and victim, while the John remains hidden due to lack of resources, societal stigma, and a legal framework that fails to treat demand as a serious criminal issue." (LLM)

https://www.bangordailynews.com/2012/10/...ostitutes/

Without the demand there would be no sex trafficking.

"Sex buyers are the primary catalyst, fueling the entire system.  Research shows that while only about six percent of men purchase sex annually, a small subset of frequent buyers accounts for nearly 75 percent of transactions. This concentrated demand incentivizes traffickers to recruit and exploit victims, often targeting those with histories of abuse, poverty, or homelessness. The demand also shapes the nature of exploitation—increasingly, buyers seek younger victims, leading to a rise in child sex trafficking." (LLM)

https://tatnonprofit.org/addressing-demand/

It seems as if they want to give the 'Johns' a slap on the wrist.

Where are you hallucinating this outrage from? No one is saying go after the supply and not the demand. Unless I missed something?

Usually when people call whores "sex workers" they're about to say something stupid, but I agree with you here. A slave who is forced into whoring is a victim, not a criminal. Obviously. And both prostitution and solicitation of prostitution are crimes.

I get that you want to tilt against the patriarchal windmill and champion some bizarre form of third-wave feminism, but it really is stretching a bit off-topic, isn't it? Unless you'd care to elaborate more (which I'm pretty sure you do).

[andy06shake]

Also 'birds of a feather flock together' and one of the most consistent factors (especially with Saville) seems to be 'charity work'.

Suppose children's charities are a wonderful smokescreen for nonces and there's some info below about Andrew and the NSPCC.


[Video: https://youtu.be/OMAlDQH_4AU]



Other Epstein pals like Bill Clinton and Peter Madelson also pop up in that NSPCC video.

Sickening.

All they do is close ranks behind the curtain Karl12.

[quintessentone]

Where are you hallucinating this outrage from? No one is saying go after the supply and not the demand. Unless I missed something?

Usually when people call whores "sex workers" they're about to say something stupid, but I agree with you here. A slave who is forced into whoring is a victim, not a criminal. Obviously. And both prostitution and solicitation of prostitution are crimes.

I get that you want to tilt against the patriarchal windmill and champion some bizarre form of third-wave feminism, but it really is stretching a bit off-topic, isn't it? Unless you'd care to elaborate more (which I'm pretty sure you do).

Who is the U.S. that is named by the survivors as being named as being complicit in child rape is being investigated? Why is there no outrage coming from where it should be coming from certain members here on DI?

[UltraBudgie]

Who is the U.S. that is named by the survivors as being named as being complicit in child rape is being investigated? Why is there no outrage coming from where it should be coming from certain members here on DI?

Dunno. I'm still outraged about the Franklin Affair and the Finders. It's sort of become a baseline now. Even with Pizzagate I was like "yeah, that figures".