57 |
626 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-08-2026, 11:08 AM)Truthhurts Wrote: Can you explain why your side consistently brings up Biden while Trump is in office? Biden sucked but he is gone, move on.
Dont lecture me on moving on as the question is valid. We hear nothing for four years and now ja boom? I want transparancy too but enough of the spin cycle.
CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO THE WORLD WHY YOU NEVER WROTE ABOUT THIS DURING THE JOE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION?
Inquiring minds want to know. The truth hurts doesnt it.
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-08-2026, 10:55 AM)Waterglass Wrote: CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO THE WORLD WHY YOU NEVER WROTE ABOUT THIS DURING THE JOE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION.
Some of us did write about this during Joe Biden's administration
And we wrote about it during Trump's first term
And we're going to keep writing about it
62 |
2,166 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-08-2026, 10:55 AM)Waterglass Wrote: CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO THE WORLD WHY YOU NEVER WROTE ABOUT THIS DURING THE JOE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION.
Maybe because Sleepy Joe didn't use it in his campaign where as Dozzy Don promised that he'd "release the Files" as a campaign promise.
Also the Administration passed the Epstein Transparency Act...
Quote: The Epstein Files Transparency Act is a law passed by the 119th United States Congress and signed by President Donald Trump on November 19, 2025. It requires the United States attorney general to "make publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format" all files pertaining to the prosecution of the deceased child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein (if needed, declassifying them to the extent possible) within 30 days of passage,
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
57 |
626 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

01-08-2026, 11:36 AM
This post was last modified: 01-08-2026, 11:37 AM by Waterglass. 
(12-20-2025, 05:45 AM)andy06shake Wrote: The completely over-the-top redactions and refusal to release the information on time speak volumes.
And when it all finally does come out in the wash.
These pathetic attempts to obfuscate and hide the truth will be like a boat anchor wrapped around the neck.
"These pathetic attempts to obfuscate and hide the truth"
You along with my federal Special Agent contact "handler" are urinating in your trousers over this. Hes a hard core lifetime Democrat who ignores other specific historical facts. Number one being that NOTHING was released during the Biden Administration as Bidens DOJ Supreme Court requests to release the files were denied in Federal court. So, Trump just could not release what he promised otherwise he could go to jail. We all know hes a blowhard dont we? So here we are today. Almost to a point of release. They stated they are redating to remove the victims.
Yet, for some reason after fours years of silence your now on the bandwagon with shaking pom poms stating pathetic attempts to obfuscate
Brainwashed
504 |
6,234 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Just a note...
It occurs to me that ... out there in the 'real' world... no one mentions and draws any lines or observations about the "new cycle" which seems to "inform" us what to be obsessed about and when something else needs public attention.
I want to point out that almost every "news" production narrative (particularly political stories) is delivered as if by "Captain Hindsight."
At some point anyone can ask of almost every news story.... "Why didn't this get reported earlier?... since they seem to have "figured out" how to tell the news story in that manner..."
... I would suggest that it shows that the story details were "given to them" all at once... (you might then ask, "by who?"... and so on...)
Any appropriate response seems only to deflect.
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

What's peculiar (to me)
Is that during Trump's 1st term and during Biden's term
It was Conservatives and MAGA pushing for Epstein transparency
Liberals/Democrat voters mainly ignored or were in opposition
Since Trump and the Democrats abruptly switched positions
Their supporters have switched positions as well
57 |
626 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-08-2026, 11:29 AM)Kurokage Wrote: Maybe because Sleepy Joe didn't use it in his campaign where as Dozzy Don promised that he'd "release the Files" as a campaign promise. 
Also the Administration passed the Epstein Transparency Act...
Well, Captain blowhard did promise it but he either forgot or didnt know that Joe Bidens DOJ tried twice via his DOJ to get the files released in Federal Court. His [Bidens'] DOJ was denied twice. So take a look at what party both judges are affilated with?
Also the Administration passed the Epstein Transparency Act... [YOU ARE CORRECT SIR DING DING DING]
Yes, a campaign promise that he did promise but could not deliver unless someone supercedes the Courts decision. Congress did. If he released those files he would be in direct violaton of a federal court directive. Congress opened the door.
Stuff is on its way. HOWEVER, US DOJ can redate anything if its in the interest of the National Security of the United States. That sucks but thats the way it is. It applies to all including Trump, Bondi and all of them. I know as they dropped one on me decades ago. You violate, guys show up and take you away to a federal prison of their choice. No hearing, trial, nothing. You get out only when you die.
62 |
2,166 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-08-2026, 12:04 PM)Waterglass Wrote: Well, Captain blowhard did promise it but he either forgot or didnt know that Joe Bidens DOJ tried twice via his DOJ to get the files released in Federal Court. His [Bidens'] DOJ was denied twice. So take a look at what party both judges are affilated with?
Also the Administration passed the Epstein Transparency Act... [YOU ARE CORRECT SIR DING DING DING]
Yes, a campaign promise that he did promise but could not deliver unless someone supercedes the Courts decision. Congress did. If he released those files he would be in direct violaton of a federal court directive. Congress opened the door.
Stuff is on its way. HOWEVER, US DOJ can redate anything if its in the interest of the National Security of the United States. That sucks but thats the way it is. It applies to all including Trump, Bondi and all of them. I know as they dropped one on me decades ago. You violate, guys show up and take you away to a federal prison of their choice. No hearing, trial, nothing. You get out only when you die.
Got any evidence old Sleepy promised that?? And did he fire up his supporters and use it as a campaign promise to help with votes??
Yes I know I was correct, Trump promised to release all the files in 30 days AFTER saying they didn't exist and were all a hoax, know we find out there's now over 5 million files suddenly all falling out the wood work. Whilst the DOJ is saying please don't believe all the files if they mention Trump!!!
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
57 |
626 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-08-2026, 12:34 PM)Kurokage Wrote: Got any evidence old Sleepy promised that?? And did he fire up his supporters and use it as a campaign promise to help with votes??
Yes I know I was correct, Trump promised to release all the files in 30 days AFTER saying they didn't exist and were all a hoax, know we find out there's now over 5 million files suddenly all falling out the wood work. Whilst the DOJ is saying please don't believe all the files if they mention Trump!!!
"Maybe because Sleepy Joe didn't use it in his campaign where as Dozzy Don promised that he'd "release the Files" as a campaign promise. Thumbup"
Got any evidence of what? You wrote Sleepy Joe was Biden and now your implying Sleepy is Trump. I cant follow you. I explained in my other post about blowhard and that Bidens DOJ tried twice to release the files but was denied by the Federal Court. Trump said 30 days when its obvious that he could never do that. SO WHY DIDNT THE PRESS CALL HIM OUT BACK THEN?
Well, since I am not getting paid to be here Waterglass out.
8 |
278 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-08-2026, 11:38 AM)Maxmars Wrote: Just a note...
It occurs to me that ... out there in the 'real' world... no one mentions and draws any lines or observations about the "new cycle" which seems to "inform" us what to be obsessed about and when something else needs public attention.
I want to point out that almost every "news" production narrative (particularly political stories) is delivered as if by "Captain Hindsight."
At some point anyone can ask of almost every news story.... "Why didn't this get reported earlier?... since they seem to have "figured out" how to tell the news story in that manner..."
... I would suggest that it shows that the story details were "given to them" all at once... (you might then ask, "by who?"... and so on...)
Any appropriate response seems only to deflect.
Of course, when it comes to 'reporting' nowadays, it's all about what isn't 'reported'. It seems 'new info' are constantly 'released' with convenient timing.
The Epstein files looks to me as a "double-layer trap". It stands as the second layer, so that other stories seem to serve as a distraction from the files, when the files themselves are a distraction from something else.
My current opinion on this whole story is the Epstein actually killed himself, and someone removed the "1 minute" in order to trigger a meme among the conspiracy theorists. If that were to be the case, it worked well.
As far as the apple tree is concerned, there's probably not much difference between a worm and a human...
Et le ver en dit : - Il y a toujours un pépin dans la pomme...
|