DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Our Binary Star
#11
(05-18-2025, 04:13 PM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: Found some information on Earth's peoiodic orbital changes.

https://science.nasa.gov/science-researc...s-climate/

And yes, I think Barnard's star is way too far away.

It would have to be a red or black dworf star to not be easily noticed.


Interesting.  Seems due to Jupiter and Saturn's gravitational pull?
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
#12
Some facts to fit Barnard's star to the Suns binary companion.

Rough calculations give it around 180 km/s average speed for stated 24000 year period applied to Barnard's star. It is measured at about 142 km/s but is moving away from the Sun at 110 km/s so it is not getting nearer. This rules it out for where the binary star would be in orbital travel.

Next candidate please.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
#13
Not impossible that our sun once had a companion, but it certainly doesn't today and definitely not Barnard's Star.

Harte
"A wise man will enjoy the goods of which there is a plentiful supply, and of intellectual rubbish he will find an abundant diet, in our own age as in every other.“   Bertrand Russell
#14
(05-18-2025, 06:00 PM)Harte Wrote: Not impossible that our sun once had a companion, but it certainly doesn't today and definitely not Barnard's Star.

Harte

Considering 85% of star systems are binary or trinary, the odds we are a singular system, is minimal. 

We also must consider the duality of our reality. A binary system would fill the voids.
#15
(05-18-2025, 03:11 PM)KKLoco Wrote: It's 25,920. 

Additionally, I do believe we are in a binary system. However, scientists have not identified our sister star. Do you know what it is?

It's the mighty 'brown dworf' Urectum! But astronomers hated that name, so they scribbled over it with a black felt-tip marker. Now, they secretly whisper about it to each other as Neu-Biro.

... Just so they wouldn't be embarrassed and keep explaining about all of that 'poo stuff' about our biology at all those intergalactic astronomy conventions.

It also means they don't have to mention those resident Anal-narkys, who went about pretending to be god-like but who froze to death when their dark 'brown' star (there's a scatological theme here) got too far away from Sol.

Lol
Support the Christchurch Call
#16
(05-18-2025, 06:17 PM)KKLoco Wrote: Considering 85% of star systems are binary or trinary, the odds we are a singular system, is minimal. 

We also must consider the duality of our reality. A binary system would fill the voids.

There is no reason ever discovered to think we are currently in a binary star system.
Like I said, it's possible that our sun once had a companion, but there's not one today.
If there was one, no way can it be Barnard's. It has the wrong trajectory through space to have come from nearby us. Simple as that.

Harte
"A wise man will enjoy the goods of which there is a plentiful supply, and of intellectual rubbish he will find an abundant diet, in our own age as in every other.“   Bertrand Russell