New video shows officer's perspective in ICE shooting of Renee Good

[chr0naut]

TL;DR (Too Leftist; Didn't Read)

So it is interfering with law enforcement?

If you didn't read it, how do you even know if it has a bias?

TRuTH (Too Retarded unable Too Hard)

I am centrist and capitalist.

[putnam6]

This type shit will make it worse a lot worse

[RazorV66]

[Maxmars]

Hoping this will be received in the spirit intended...

Who you are,
how you self-identify ideologically, politically, or any other way,

how you asses others in those terms, etc.

Is obtusely off-topic.

Unless you want to go to the pit where that seems relevant for some reason.

We've seen the officer's perspective...

some judge it, others disagree with those judgements... and will now call each other names... <yawn>

Wow... stop the presses....

[UltraBudgie]

If you didn't read it, how do you even know if it has a bias?

Sigh, you "got me". I did read it. And it's a fine rant, as such things go. But in no way connected to the question I pondered, and wasn't addressing to anyone in particular. I was puzzled why you quoted it, in fact.

For context, here was my question that you quoted but were unclear on what your opinion was:

I'm not sure why following ICE around blowing whistles and honking horns is not considered interfering with law enforcement.

Try that with your local cops and see what happens, for example.

[Truthhurts]

How terrible do you have to be for even Joe Rogan to call you out.

[Truthhurts]

[Truthhurts]

[Truthhurts]

And now they are threatening American citizens.

[chr0naut]

Sigh, you "got me". I did read it. And it's a fine rant, as such things go. But in no way connected to the question I pondered, and wasn't addressing to anyone in particular. I was puzzled why you quoted it, in fact.

For context, here was my question that you quoted but were unclear on what your opinion was:

I bet they were all intending to interfere with strip searches, too, by wearing underwear. Every damn one of 'em!

You see, it is easy to make up some very silly reasons to vilify people and allege they have criminal intent.

Blowing whistles and honking car horns are what happens at political rallies and sporting events, too. I mean any and every noisy crowd could be considered as 'interfering with law enforcement', if you try hard enough.

This is why these things are considered as legitimate protest, and are not considered interfering with the law, because they don't, much, do they. I wonder why cars with sirens and lights aren't considered to be interfering with law enforcement, for exactly the same reason?

And, who were ICE actually arresting in this particular quiet neighbourhood outside of a school? Surely they would have sought to justify their presence there by identifying the specific criminals that they expected to catch in their 'sweep'?