27 |
2,060 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-12-2026, 02:50 PM)MonkMode Wrote: Jumping in front of a moving car is not protecting yourself.
it is something suicidal maniacs do.
They told Good to get out. The car was stopped. There was an officer at the door. Good initially went backward. The agent in front didn’t jump in front of the car. Good went from reverse to accelerating forward hitting the one agent.
27 |
2,060 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

01-12-2026, 03:01 PM
This post was last modified: 01-12-2026, 03:03 PM by WallFlowerActive. 
(01-12-2026, 02:34 PM)RazorV66 Wrote: [Video: https://youtu.be/7jzuyOZWe_0?si=7Csae9DaaU-aUogK]
?????
Added. That’s not being a legal observer. Or do I not understand the concept of observer?
5 |
435 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-12-2026, 02:52 PM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: They told Good to get out. The car was stopped. There was an officer at the door. Good initially went backward. The agent in front didn’t jump in front of the car. Good went from reverse to accelerating forward hitting the one agent.
Did you see his video? He was at the side when she started to back up, then he walked to the front. Did he think he could stop the vehicle with his hands?
3 |
1,107 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

01-12-2026, 03:04 PM
This post was last modified: 01-12-2026, 03:05 PM by KrustyKrab. 
(01-12-2026, 02:20 PM)chr0naut Wrote: I am not an attorney and I am not an American.
However, even US citizens know your legal system is corrupt. Your President accuses opponents of 'lawfare' and also seeks to prosecute those who have committed no crimes (such as the director of the Federal Reserve). US law is clearly not impartial and is obviously being corruptly manipulated.
In other countries, if you have killed someone, you have killed someone. Having done so in self defence does not absolve you of the killing.
I am fairly sure that almost every murderer in the US has argued self-defence and very many are released without conviction because of it.
In fact, someone with murderous intent and a bit of planning can stage things so it looks like they were just defending themselves. Like inviting their victim to their home, killing them, placing a gun in the hand of the corpse, and then saying it was a home invasion and they were just defending themselves.
For this reason alone, any killing must receive a sentence in a just system. It honours the sanctity of human life and also means that real murderers don't go free.
US law is more 'Cowboys and Indians', than it is the 10 Commandments - it is more usually motivated by revenge and competition, rather than justice for all.
ICE have also removed women, children and legal US citizens in error. People who have not committed crimes. And they have injured and killed citizens. They are a gang of thugs and hooligans with their faces covered and in body armour and have been attacking people that they do not have warrants to arrest.
We in America haven’t given up our right’s and freedom to protect ourselves, sorry about your bad luck.
Plain stupid to charge someone criminally for protecting themselves and others but that’s who your government is, they love defenseless citizens like you.
Make us a list of those citizens harmed or killed without due cause. I’ll wait…..
As far as trump accusing opponents of lawfare??? If you were paying attention you’d know that is 100% fact. They illegally spied on Trump and Senators among other “lawfare” gestures they’ve done, it’s been endless. He’s been the most persecuted president in my lifetime. Your TDS is so bad that you’re in denial and don’t want to see it. What a joke to come here claiming you’re an attorney when almost everything you say can be proven wrong. You gaslight and spew bs on every post you make. They would laugh you out of court with truth and facts so fast and tell you to take your bs elsewhere.
27 |
2,060 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

01-12-2026, 03:05 PM
This post was last modified: 01-12-2026, 03:11 PM by WallFlowerActive. 
(01-12-2026, 03:03 PM)MonkMode Wrote: Did you see his video? He was at the side when she started to back up, then he walked to the front. Did he think he could stop the vehicle with his hands?
Wrong. There was an agent at the door and one agent already in front.
Added. As in the car was an already surrounded by agents when Good was stopped and was being told to get out.
5 |
435 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-12-2026, 03:05 PM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Wrong. There was an agent at the door and one agent already in front.
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...3a23d.jpeg]
Added. As in the car was an already surrounded by agents when Good was stopped told to get out.
Did watch the clip in the OP? He filmed the agent saying get out of the car, from the other side, when she started to back up. He then moved in front of the car.
27 |
2,060 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-12-2026, 03:15 PM)MonkMode Wrote: Did watch the clip in the OP? He filmed the agent saying get out of the car, from the other side, when she started to back up. He then moved in front of the car.
While it was stopped.
How did the one agent get in front of the car while the other agent is literally at the door.
And has what to do with your first claim..
(01-12-2026, 03:03 PM)MonkMode Wrote: Did you see his video? He was at the side when she started to back up, then he walked to the front. Did he think he could stop the vehicle with his hands?
Wrong. There was an agent at the door and one agent already in front.
Added. As in the car was an already surrounded by agents when Good was stopped and was being told to get out.
27 |
2,060 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-12-2026, 03:15 PM)MonkMode Wrote: He filmed the agent saying get out of the car, from the other side, when she started to back up. He then moved in front of the car.
How does one at the hood of a car jump in front of its line of travel if the car is moving in reverse anyway?
31 |
751 |
| JOINED: |
Aug 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Tim Pool's view: The Minneapolis ICE Shooting Is Almost Impossible to Prosecute
https://www.bitchute.com/video/U1uDSjca8EY
45-48
2 |
787 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-10-2026, 12:56 AM)EXETER Wrote: Yes, it generally is. But it's generally not a capital offense unless it is premeditated.
I think it's far simpler than all of that. If she depressed the gas pedal while knowing someone, anyone, was in front of her vehicle, it is attempted murder and possible attempted premeditated murder. If she did not look first, it would be some form of manslaughter. Either way, shooting to stop the threat is self-defense.
The problem here is that people are looking at things through heavily biased eyes.
It may boil down to a frame-by-frame look at a video to see if the car moves, even an inch, before the first shot was fired, and if it did, any and all shots were justified to stop someone willing to kill a cop.
Personally, I think the blame falls on the politicians and their political propaganda, which is working people up into a frenzy. People who normally would never do something like that.
Or it's something in the water.
"Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."
- Benjamin Franklin -
|