DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Net Zero advocates propose ticks to induce red meat allergy as climate solution
#1
What is wrong with people these days, esp. the academics? And why the hell is  this coming from my home state of Michigan?
 
Quote:Net Zero advocates propose ticks to induce red meat allergy as climate solution sparking backlash

Two ethics professors at Western Michigan University’s Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Parker Crutchfield and Blake Hereth, have ignited outrage with a peer-reviewed paper proposing the deliberate promotion of ticks to trigger alpha-gal syndrome (AGS)—a red-meat allergy—to reduce meat consumption and combat climate change. Published in Bioethics, their “Beneficial Bloodsucking” argument frames AGS as a “moral bioenhancer,” asserting that inducing allergies to cattle, pigs and lambs could ethically “prioritize planetary health over personal choice.” The controversial stance has drawn sharp criticism, with opponents calling it a dangerous confluence of pseudo-science and ideological overreach.


https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-08-14-c...lergy.html

Isn't this considered biological warfare against the citizens of your own country, state, city, town, or neighborhood? Isn't this conspiratorial plans about a terrorist bio attack on the United States of America? This is a threat of terror to force people to stop consuming meat, and an actual act of terror if carried out. These are executable offenses they are suggesting, making such plans are high crimes.
#2
It’s gone from save the children to save the planet.
#3
This is both evil and insane.

Shocked2
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
#4
(08-14-2025, 11:47 AM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: This is both evil and insane.

Shocked2

I said something similar when I told my GF about this one and added I will never trust a scientist or academic type know-it-all ever again. They are all totally insane. This suggestion deserves a visit from the alphabet guys, all of them, then these criminal lunatics need to be Gitmoed immediately.

We need to write to Trump and I should find someone to write in my home state, someone I can trust, if there is such a politician.
#5
(08-14-2025, 11:34 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: It’s gone from save the children to save the planet.

I totally agree, except that I'd add that any intentional interference to the naturally evolving situation of the Earth's biosphere does nothing to save the planet's ecology.

If humans insist on trying to correct Mother Nature rather than adapt to changing conditions, we deserve extinction. We need to change, and not our diet. Our sky-high energy consumption and careless waste disposal is far more critical to the biosphere and ecology than what we eat for dinner and how it is produced. No one, esp. countries like China, will ever admit that.
#6
Can't eat red meat, can't eat blue meat, well what color meat can we eat at this point. 
California Issues Warning After Trapper Finds Pigs with “Slushie Blue” Colored Meat | MeatEater Conservation News


Also the meat looks more like it was dyed after the kill rather than beforehand, but what do I know. Does anyone that uses rat poison even know if it taints the meat blue?
#7
These are the end times when good is evil and evil is good. 

First, these are "ethics professors" publishing their ideas in a rag called "Bioethics" under the subject of medical ethics. Does anyone remember the Hippocratic oath? Oh, wait, I don't think any professor takes any kind of oath (except to Lucifer, maybe), and they probably don't consider Hippocrates ethical to begin with. 

This term they used in the article, "moral bioenhancer". It is as if a disease carried by a tick has some moral characteristics. I fail to see the morality of encouraging or enhancing a disabling disease with the intention of infecting an entire human population. This anti-morality is entirely Satanic, and these demon-possessed professors can't understand the cognitive dissonance.

The thing is, they have already proven on many occasions they believe that encouraging or enhancing a disabling disease with the intention of infecting the entire human population is moral, even necessary.
#8
This was something that was talked about at one of the recent WEF conferences. I wish I could find the video as I was just looking for it last week. Anyway, one of themembers there stated that they thought the idea of changing behaviors through allergies like the one spread by ticks was interesting and promising. This is also after a couple articles came out last week how this red meat allergy is surging this year. Imagine that.
#9
(08-14-2025, 11:29 AM)MichSwampbuck Wrote: What is wrong with people these days, esp. the academics? And why the hell is  this coming from my home state of Michigan?
 


https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-08-14-c...lergy.html

Isn't this considered biological warfare against the citizens of your own country, state, city, town, or neighborhood? Isn't this conspiratorial plans about a terrorist bio attack on the United States of America? This is a threat of terror to force people to stop consuming meat, and an actual act of terror if carried out. These are executable offenses they are suggesting, making such plans are high crimes.

They can have my red meat when they can tear it from my cold, dead, greasy hands.
-Plato
#10
(08-14-2025, 12:41 PM)Awhispersecho Wrote: This was something that was talked about at one of the recent WEF conferences. I wish I could find the video as I was just looking for it last week. Anyway, one of themembers there stated that they thought the idea of changing behaviors through allergies like the one spread by ticks was interesting and promising. This is also after a couple articles came out last week how this red meat allergy is surging this year. Imagine that.

I saw that as well. it was awhile ago. This has all the ear marks of Billy the Gates who is most intent on taking control of the food supply. Everything will be fake, fake meat, fake butter. He's been practicing in his hunting fields- Africa.


The university, like the others is dependent on the Gates Foundation, and Billy directs what research will be funded.
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/me...-practices

It gets worse if that's possible-

https://onpasture.com/2014/03/31/excre-m...ge-sludge/

I do not like this poo- poo meat.
I do not like it here or there.
I do not like it anywhere.

Try it- Try it.
You will see.
Poo Poo meat is here to stay.

I could not, would not eat that steak.
It is poo-poo meat, not real steak.

I do not trust Bill the Gates. 
I do not trust him here or there.
I do not trust him anywhere.

If not the poo poo meat
What about zee tasty bugs?
You can eat them here or there.
You can eat them everywhere.

You can eat poo poo meat.
You can eat zee tasty bugs.
I could not, would not eat them.
Not here, not there, not anywhere.