17 |
5,529 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-14-2025, 01:15 PM)PorkChop96 Wrote: Do you have evidence that shows he was abusing it?
You relating Musk taking ketamine to Biden doing coke is like saying giving someone a paper cut and hacking their arm off with a machete are the same thing.
I'll leave you to whatever delusions you want to have to keep yourself happy.
Wow. I can't keep up with your mental gymnastics.
Careful, or you'll do yourself a mischief?
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
13 |
1,039 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
08-14-2025, 01:28 PM
This post was last modified: 08-14-2025, 01:28 PM by PorkChop96. 
(08-14-2025, 01:25 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Wow. I can't keep up with your mental gymnastics.
Careful, or you'll do yourself a mischief?
Quote:Only if you are abusing it regularly which you apparently are not.
This was your response to me asking if I was given ketamine for a procedure, does that make me a drug head too. You are insinuating that Musk is/was abusing it.
How is asking for evidence to back up your claims that he was abusing it "mental gymnastics"?
17 |
5,529 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-14-2025, 01:28 PM)PorkChop96 Wrote:
This was your response to me asking if I was given ketamine for a procedure, does that make me a drug head too. You are insinuating that Musk is/was abusing it.
How is asking for evidence to back up your claims that he was abusing it "mental gymnastics"?
I have eyes, and quite apart from his own admission to being a regular user, I have enough life experience to know someone who's off their face when I see one.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
13 |
1,039 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(08-14-2025, 01:32 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: I have eyes, and quite apart from his own admission to being a regular user, I have enough life experience to know someone who's off their face when I see one.
Regular user and regular abuser are two different things, but whatever floats you goat
Let me get this straight, assuming is okay when you do it....gotcha
Carry on
62 |
2,166 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-14-2025, 12:26 PM)PorkChop96 Wrote: Just to clear this up, for the millionth time, Trump was made a felon for a misdemeanor.....nobody else in the history of NYC has been convicted of a felony for the same crime.
I see you skipped the actual facts I posted, instead of the ones you made up!?!?! So nobody else has been convicted for the same crime?
Quote:Nearly half of the people convicted of the same crimes as Donald Trump in New York state receive prison time, a new analysis finds.
Forty-two percent of people convicted of falsifying business records in New York in the last decade were sentenced to time in jail or prison, a new study from The New York Times found. In Manhattan specifically, that number is closer to one-third, the outlet’s analysis showed.
A Manhattan jury convicted Trump in May of 34 felony charges of falsifying business records in connection with a scheme to silence adult film star Stormy Daniels, whose story about having sex with Trump threatened to derail his 2016 presidential campaign.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
13 |
1,039 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(08-14-2025, 01:37 PM)Kurokage Wrote: I see you skipped the actual facts I posted, instead of the ones you made up!?!?! So nobody else has been convicted for the same crime?
I skipped over your "facts" because they are incorrect. Just as most things you believe form the media you choose to idolize.
Trump was charged with falsifying his business records, but he was not the one who did. All Trump did was make payments to someone, which in the context of what they were for, was not illegal.
Find someone else in the state of NY, or the whole country, that was convicted of something someone else did. Get a clue bud
17 |
5,529 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-14-2025, 01:35 PM)PorkChop96 Wrote: Regular user and regular abuser are two different things, but whatever floats you goat
Let me get this straight, assuming is okay when you do it....gotcha
Carry on
Well, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make a MAGA think...
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
62 |
2,166 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-14-2025, 01:40 PM)PorkChop96 Wrote: I skipped over your "facts" because they are incorrect. Just as most things you believe form the media you choose to idolize.
Trump was charged with falsifying his business records, but he was not the one who did. All Trump did was make payments to someone, which in the context of what they were for, was not illegal.
Find someone else in the state of NY, or the whole country, that was convicted of something someone else did. Get a clue bud
Wow, almost as wriggly as your hero Trump with your denial.
They were his records, for his businesses and it was Trump who Ok'ed payments to Daniels to keep her mouth shut.
Quote: A Manhattan jury convicted Trump in May of 34 felony charges of falsifying business records in connection with a scheme to silence adult film star Stormy Daniels, whose story about having sex with Trump threatened to derail his 2016 presidential campaign.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
17 |
5,529 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-14-2025, 01:41 PM)PorkChop96 Wrote: Fixed your remark 
Carry on
Errrrm.... I'll forego the obvious response because I don't want this site to descend into the shit show that ATS became before it's sad demise.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
13 |
1,039 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(08-14-2025, 01:45 PM)Kurokage Wrote: Wow, almost as wriggly as your hero Trump with your denial.
They were his records, for his businesses and it was Trump who Ok'ed payments to Daniels to keep her mouth shut.
Yes because nobody has accountants/lawyers anymore.....dunce
Michael Cohen was the one that the payments, and records, were made through. Are you really this dense? That's a rhetorical question btw
|